Skip to main content

Supporting Creative Teaching and Learning in the Classroom: Myths, Models, and Measures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity Under Duress in Education?

Part of the book series: Creativity Theory and Action in Education ((CTAE,volume 3))

Abstract

Creativity is enjoying a resurgence of interest in the education systems of many developed countries. The core of this is the recognition that creativity, in its broadest sense that encompasses divergent thinking, problem-solving, and related abilities is a core skill in the twenty-first century. While there is a great deal of rigorous, empirical research that underpins creative teaching and learning, there remains much rhetoric, myth, and misconception that militates against efforts to embed creativity in the modern classroom. In this chapter, we first explore some of the general beliefs that frequently interfere with efforts to broaden and systematise the understanding of creativity. We also examine specific evidence from teachers, suggesting that this practitioner cohort is favourably primed and disposed to teach both for and with creativity. In the literature of creative education, we identify and address a significant gap relating to developmental models of creativity. Finally, we discuss some of the nuances of creativity in school settings, offering specific advice for school teachers who are at the coal-face of creative education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acar, B. S. (1998). Releasing creativity in an interdisciplinary systems engineering course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(2), 133–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ACARA. (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority). (2010). The shape of the national curriculum. Sydney, Australia. Retrieved from http://docs.acara.edu.au/resources/Draft__Shape__AC_Geography21062010.pdf

  • Allsopp, D. H. (1997). Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 18(6), 367–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2003). The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60, 32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). Characteristics of improved formative assessment practice. Education Inquiry, 8(2), 104–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (2016). Creativity doesn’t develop in a vacuum. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi, H., Downing, J. M., Osborne, M. A., & Schneider, P. (2017). The future of skills: employment in 2030. London, UK: Pearson and NESTA Retrieved from https://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/the_future_of_skills_employment_in_2030_0.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbot, B., Lubart, T. I., & Besançon, M. (2016). “Peaks, slumps, and bumps”: Individual differences in the development of creativity in children and adolescents. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016(151), 33–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.). (2017). Nurturing creativity in the classroom (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, C. (2004). Professor John Eggleston memorial lecture 2004-creativity: Caught or taught? Journal of Design & Technology Education, 9(3), 138–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamires, M., & Peterson, A. (2014). Can creativity be assessed? Towards an evidence-informed framework for assessing and planning progress in creativity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camp, G. C. (1994). A longitudinal study of correlates of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. M. (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2000). Teaching creativity: Philosophy and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (1982). Kreativität: Entstehungsbedingungen und Einflußfaktoren [Creativity: Conditions of development and factors of influence]. In W. Wieczerkowski, & H. Z. Oeveste, (Eds.), Lehrbuch der Entwicklungspsychologie. Bd II [Handbook of development psychology]. (Vol. 2, pp. 259–274). Dusseldorf, Germany: Schwann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (1997). Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (Vol. 1, pp. 83–114). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (2001). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. London, UK: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (2016). The myths of heaven-sent creativity: Towards a perhaps less democratic but more down-to-earth understanding. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (2018). The creativity-facilitating teacher index: Early thinking, and some recent reflections. In K. Soh (Ed.), Creativity fostering teacher behavior: Measurement and research (pp. 1–15). Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J., & Field, T. W. (1968). Achievement in science and intellectual style. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53(2), 132–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (in press). Malevolent creativity: Past, present and future. In J. C. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A. E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. A. (1982). A model for teaching for creative development. Roeper Review, 5(2), 27–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, F. T. (1991). The creative engineer. In R. A. Smith (Ed.), Innovative teaching in engineering (pp. 497–502). London, UK: Ellis Horwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J. A., & Jackson, P. W. (1962). Creativity and intelligence: Explorations with gifted students. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Revisiting the “art bias” in lay conceptions of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruszka, A., & Tang, M. (2017). The 4P’s creativity model and its application in different fields. In M. Tang & C. H. Werner (Eds.), Handbook of the management of creativity and innovation: Theory and practice (pp. 51–71). Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • HKCDC, & HKEAA. (2007). Music curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). Retrieved from Hong Kong, HK: Hong Kong Government Education Bureau. Retrieved from http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/kla/arts-edu/pdp-nss-mus/Music%20CnA%20Guide_e_25-11-2015.pdf

  • Ihsen, S., & Brandt, D. (1998). Editorial: Creativity: How to educate and train innovative engineers. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, B., & Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity, distinctions and relationships. Journal of Educational Studies, 30(1), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). Development and application of steam teaching model based on the Rube Goldberg’s invention. In S. S. Yeo, Y. Pan, Y. S. Lee, & H. B. Chang (Eds.), Computer science and its applications (pp. 693–698). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G., Freilinger, J., Wilmes, L. (1988). Kreativitätstest für Vorschul-und Schulkinder (KVS): Testentwicklung, Handanweisung, Testheft [Creativity test for preschool and schoolchildren: Test development, instructions for administration, test booklet]. Trierer Psychologische Berichte, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landrum, T. J., & McDuffie, K. A. (2010). Learning styles in the age of differentiated instruction. Exceptionality, 18(1), 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likar, B., Cankar, F., & Zupan, B. (2015). Educational model for promoting creativity and innovation in primary schools. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32(2), 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y.-S. (2011). Fostering creativity through education – A conceptual framework of creative pedagogy. Creative Education, 2(3), 149–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longshaw, S. (2009). Creativity in science teaching. School Science Review, 90(332), 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MESC. (2011). Icelandic national curriculum. Reykjavik, Iceland: Ministry of Education, Science and Culture Retrieved from https://www.government.is/library/01-Ministries/Ministry-of-Education/Curriculum/adskr_grsk_ens_2012.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, R. M., & Feldman, N. O. (1979). Creativity as a predictor of teachers’ effectiveness. Psychological Reports, 45(3), 899–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Henriksen, D. (2013). A NEW approach to defining and measuring creativity: Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century. TechTrends, 57(5), 10–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, A. F. (1952). Wake up your mind: 101 ways to develop creativeness. New York, NY: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patston, T. P. (2017). Introducing creative education in a school. Retrieved from https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/articles/introducing-creative-education-in-a-school

  • Patston, T., Cropley, D. H., Marrone, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2018). Teacher implicit beliefs of creativity: Is there an arts Bias? Teaching and teacher education (Vol. 75, pp. 366–374).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A. (2017). Creativity – It’s not just for hippies anymore. In J. A. Plucker (Ed.), Creativity and innovation: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1–3). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renzulli, J. S. (2016). Developing creativity across all areas of the curriculum. In R. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 23–44). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblatt, E., & Winner, E. (1988). The art of children’s drawing. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 22(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, L., & Riordan, R. (2017). Changing the subject. In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 3–5). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (1992). Children’s divergent thinking and creative ideation. Developmental Review, 12(3), 233–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2007). A hierarchical framework for the study of creativity. New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2003). Emergence in creativity and development. In R. K. Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S. Moran, R. Sternberg, D. H. Feldman, M. Csikszentmihalyi, & J. Nakamura (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 12-60). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, R. (2010). Creativity and education. Creative Education, 1(3), 166–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. J., & Carlsson, I. M. (1990). The creative process: A functional model based on empirical studies from early childhood to middle age. Psychological Issues, 57, 1–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. C. (2000). Indexing creativity fostering teacher behavior: A preliminary validation study. Journal of Creative Behavior, 34(2), 118–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. C. (2015). Creativity fostering teacher behaviour around the world: Annotations of studies using the CFTIndex. Cogent Education, 2(1034494), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh, K. C. (Ed.). (2018). Creativity fostering teacher behavior: Measurement and research. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1993). Investing in creativity. Psychological Inquiry, 4(3), 229–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 325–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Teaching for creativity: The sounds of silence. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(2), 115–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symes, I. (2014). The flux report: Building a resilient workforce in the face of flux. Retrieved from https://www.rightmanagement.co.uk/wps/wcm/connect/right-uk-en/home/thoughtwire/categories/thought-leadership/The+Flux+Report+-+Building+a+resilient+workforce+in+the+face+of+flux

  • Taylor, I. A. (1975). An emerging view of creative actions. In I. A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 297–325). Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törnkvist, S. (1998). Creativity: Can it be taught? The case of engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1968). A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12(4), 195–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. C. (2015). A framework of creative education. Education, 21(1), 137–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, K. K. (1991). On the development of creativity in children. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 177–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, H. (2016). Value in mathematics learning. Melbourne, Australia: University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Cropley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cropley, D.H., Patston, T.J. (2019). Supporting Creative Teaching and Learning in the Classroom: Myths, Models, and Measures. In: Mullen, C.A. (eds) Creativity Under Duress in Education?. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90272-2_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90271-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90272-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics