Abstract
The countries participating in a comparative survey are represented by their national research teams. The present chapter outlines the tasks and responsibilities of these teams. They are responsible for implementing the survey guidelines established by the central project coordinators. Their key tasks include the transfer of the questionnaire to the national level in such a way that it is not only understandable for the general population but also harmonizable for cross-national comparison.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beatty, P. C., & Willis, G. B. (2007). Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71(2), 287–311.
European Commission (2014). Mutual information system on social protection, MISSOC. MISSOC comparative tables database. http://www.missoc.org/INFORMATIONBASE/COMPARATIVETABLES/MISSOCDATABASE/comparativeTableSearch.jsp. Retrieved on January 26, 2018.
European Commission & Eurostat (2017a). EU Labour Force Survey. Database user guide. Version: September 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/1978984/6037342/EULFS-Database-UserGuide.pdf. Retrieved on January 26, 2018.
European Commission & Eurostat (2017b). European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC). Description of dataset. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/microdata/european-union-statistics-on-income-and-living-conditions. Retrieved on January 26, 2018.
European Commission & Eurostat (2017c). Household Budget Surveys (HBS). Description of the HBS scientific-use files. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/microdata/household-budget-survey. Retrieved on January 26, 2018.
European Social Survey. www.europeansocialsurvey.org. Retrieved on January 26, 2018.
Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. H. P., & Warner, U. (2009). Private household concepts and their operationalisation in cross-national social surveys. Metodološki zvezki, 6(1), 1–26.
Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. H. P., & Warner, U. (2015). Design and development of the income measures in the European Social Surveys. Metodološki zvezki, 12(2), 85–110.
Johnson T. P., & Braun, M. (2016). Challenges of comparative survey research. In: C. Wolf, D. Joye, T. W. Smith, & Y.-C. Fu (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of survey methodology (pp. 41–53). London: Sage.
Miller, K., & Willis, G. B. (2016). Cognitive models of answering processes. In C. Wolf, D. Joye, T. W. Smith, & Y.-C. Fu (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of survey methodology (pp. 210–217). London: Sage.
Presser, S., Couper, M. C., Lessler, J. T., Martin, E., Martin, J., Rothgeb, J. M., et al. (2004). Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 109–130.
Schnell, R. (2012). Survey-interviews. Methoden standardisierter Befragungen. Lehrbuch. Studienskripten zur Soziologie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Schuman, H. (1966). The random probe: A technique for evaluating the validity of closed questions. American Sociological Review, 31(2), 218–222.
Statistics Sweden (2004). Design your questions right. How to develop, test, evaluate and improve questionnaires. Research and Development. Statistics Sweden, Statistiska centralbyrån. http://www.scb.se/statistik/_publikationer/OV9999_2004A01_BR_X97OP0402.pdf. Retrieved on January 26, 2018.
UNESCO-UIS (2018). ISCED mappings. http://uis.unesco.org/en/isced-mappings. Retrieved on January 26, 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J.H.P., Warner, U. (2018). National Research Teams. In: Sociodemographic Questionnaire Modules for Comparative Social Surveys. SpringerBriefs in Population Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90209-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90209-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90208-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90209-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)