Skip to main content

The Adoption of RES Methodology in Strategic Environmental Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ecosystem Services for Spatial Planning

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 584 Accesses

Abstract

The RES implementation in the Planning process is associated with the Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) providing valid support for the definition of the planning strategies across the entire process, especially for the evaluation of alternative scenarios. The last chapter outlines how SEA should incorporate and guarantee ES assessment adopting RES methodology for the definition of sustainable solutions that avoid impacts on ES provision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Categories 1 and 2 of the Qualitative standard analysis were not considered because are referred to the location and typology of the AT in the current situation.

References

  • Baker J, Sheate WR, Phillips P, Eales R (2013) Ecosystem services in environmental assessment—elp or hindrance? Environ Impact Assess Rev 40:3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2012.11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duinker PN, Greig LA (2007) Scenario analysis in environmental impact assessment: improving explorations of the future. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2006.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti D (2011) Reasons and options for integrating ecosystem services in strategic environmental assessment of spatial planning. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 7:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2011.617711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti D (2016) Handbook on biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment. Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Geneletti D, Bagli S, Napolitano P, Pistocchi A (2007) Spatial decision support for strategic environmental assessment of land use plans. A case study in southern Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev 27:408–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parliament European (2001) Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001, on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. Off J Eur Communities 197:30–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2005) A Practical guide to the strategic environmental assessment directive. London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Ronchi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ronchi, S. (2018). The Adoption of RES Methodology in Strategic Environmental Assessment. In: Ecosystem Services for Spatial Planning. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90185-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90185-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90184-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90185-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics