Skip to main content

Mobile Technologies in the Primary Mathematics Classroom: Engaging or Not?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Using Mobile Technologies in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education in the Digital Era ((MEDE,volume 12))

Abstract

Many schools invest in mobile technologies or actively promote their use through Bring Your Own Device (BYOD ) programs with the expectation that the use of such devices will improve student engagement and, as a result, improve student learning outcomes. However, there is little research to date that explores teacher and student perceptions of whether and how the use of mobile technologies within mathematics classrooms does indeed improve engagement with mathematics. This chapter draws on data from a small range of research projects investigating the use of mobile technologies and associated applications in the primary mathematics classroom. It uses a multidimensional view of engagement and the Framework for Engagement with Mathematics as a lens to re-analyse existing and new data. Issues relating to engagement and the use of mobile technologies will be explored within the context of classrooms where students and many of their teachers are now considered to be ‘digital natives’, and Information and Communication Technologies are an integral and ubiquitous part of their daily lives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Attard, C. (2013). Introducing iPads into primary mathematics pedagogies: An exploration of two teachers’ experiences. Paper Presented at the Mathematics Education: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow (Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia), Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attard, C. (2014). “I don’t like it, I don’t love it, but I do it and I don’t mind”: Introducing a framework for engagement with mathematics. Curriculum Perspectives, 34(3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attard, C. (2015). Introducing iPads into primary mathematics classrooms: Teachers’ experiences and pedagogies. In M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, K. Mavrou, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Integrating touch enabled and mobile devices into contemporary mathematics education (pp. 197–217). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attard, C. (2016). Research evaluation of matific mathematics learning resources: Project report. Penrith, NSW: Western Sydney University. https://doi.org/10.4225/35/57f2f391015a4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Attard, C., & Curry, C. (2012, July). Exploring the use of iPads to engage young students with mathematics. Paper presented at the Mathematics education: Expanding horizons, (Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavis, C., Muspratt, S., & Thompson, R. (2015). ‘Computer games can get your brain working’: Student experience and perceptions of digital games in the classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2015). Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on realistic mathematics education. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, T. J. (2015). An introduction to gamification: Adding game elements for engagement. Medical References Services Quarterly, 34(4), 471–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, N. S., & Campbell, A. (2016). Using mathematical apps with reluctant learners. In: Digital experiences in mathematics education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0011-y.

  • Chang, M., Evans, M. A., Kim, S., Norton, A., & Samur, Y. (2015). Differential effects of learning games on mathematics proficiency. Educational Media International, 52(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristol, D., & Gimbert, B. (2014). Academic achievement in BYOD classrooms. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 4(1), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair Go Team NSW Department of Education and Training. (2006). School is for me: Pathways to student engagement. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goehle, G., & Wagaman, J. (2016). The impact of gamification in web based homework. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 26(6), 557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handal, B., Campbell, C., Cavanagh, M., & Petocz, P. (2016). Characterising the perceived value of mathematics educational apps in preservice teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: A stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103(4), 401–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualising and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilton, A. (2016). Engaging primary school students in mathematics: Can iPads make a difference? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9771-5.

  • Hu, H., & Garimella, U. (2014). iPads for STEM teachers: A case study on perceived usefulness, perceived proficiency, intention to adopt, and integration in K-12 instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Change, 7(1), 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, N., Williamson-Leadley, S., & Pratt, K. (2016). Showing and telling: Using tablet technology to engage students in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 123–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, T. L., & Grabner-Hagen, M. M. (2015). Gamification: Questing to integrate content knowledge, literacy, and 21st-century learning. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 59(1), 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge?. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., Mavrou, K., & Paparistodemou, E. (2015). Preface Integrating touch-enabled and mobile devices into contemporary mathematics education (pp. xx–xxvii). IGI Global, Hershey, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muir, T., & Geiger, V. (2016). The affordances of using a flipped classroom approach in the teaching of mathematics: A case study of a grade 10 mathematics class. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munns, G., & Martin, A. J. (2005). It’s all about MeE: A motivation and engagement framework. Paper Presented at the Australian Association for Academic Research Focus Conference, Cairns. http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/mun05400.pdf.

  • OECD. (2015). Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. Paris: pISA < OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers’ intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N., Potter, J., & Cranmer, S. (2009). Primary pupils’ use of information and communication technologies at school and home. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 919–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Trussell, R., Gellegos, B., & Asam, R. (2015). Using math apps for improving student learning: An exploratory study in an inclusive fourth grade classroom. TechTrends, 59(2), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Attard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Attard, C. (2018). Mobile Technologies in the Primary Mathematics Classroom: Engaging or Not?. In: Calder, N., Larkin, K., Sinclair, N. (eds) Using Mobile Technologies in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90179-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90179-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90178-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90179-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics