Advertisement

DIY Neighborhoods

  • Emily Talen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter traces the pros and cons of the self-determined, self-managed, DIY Neighborhood, a neighborhood where residents have an ability to define, control, and govern its affairs. Theoretically, the DIY neighborhood would seem to offer four advantages: efficiency, accountability, familiarity, and convenience. But while many believe as a matter of principle that neighborhoods should be empowered to control their own destinies, there are definitional, governance, and funding issues to deal with. It is also necessary to contend with the uncomfortable relationship between a neighborhood’s social homogeneity, its physical definition, and its ability to self-govern.

References

  1. A basic guide to ABCD community organizing-1.docx—A Basic guide to ABCD community organizing-1.pdf. http://www.abcdinstitute.org/docs/A%20Basic%20Guide%20to%20ABCD%20Community%20Organizing-1.pdf. Accessed 30 June 2014.
  2. Agnew, J. A. (1980). The danger of a neighborhood definition of community. Community Education Journal, 7(3), 30–31.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmed, K. G. (2012, March 1). Urban social sustainability: A study of the Emirati local communities in Al Ain. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 5(1), 41–66.Google Scholar
  4. Arnstein, S. R. (1969, July). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar
  5. Bailey, N., & Pill, M. (2011). The continuing popularity of the neighbourhood and neighbourhood governance in the transition from the ‘big state’ to the ‘big society’ paradigm. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(5), 927–942.  https://doi.org/10.1068/c1133r.
  6. Baker, B. (2014). With a little help from our friends: Creating community as we grow older (1st ed.). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism (G. Elliott, Trans.). London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Grasmick, H. G. (2002). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  9. Campleman, G. (1951, January). Some sociological aspects of mixed-class neighbourhood planning. Sociological Review (1908–1952), 43, 191–200.Google Scholar
  10. Ceraso, K. (1999, November/December). Seattle neighborhood planning: Citizen empowerment or collective daydreaming? Shelterforce, 108. www.nhi.org/online/issues/108/seattle.html. Accessed 3 December 2017.
  11. Checkoway, B. (1984, January 1). Two types of planning in neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 3(2), 102–109.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X8400300209.
  12. Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2004). HOPE VI relocation: Moving to new neighborhoods and building new ties. Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), 415–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowan, R. (2005). The dictionary of urbanism. Tisbury: Streetwise Press.Google Scholar
  14. Crenson, M. A. (1978, August). Social networks and political processes in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Political Science, 22(3), 578.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2110462.
  15. Davies, W. K. D., & Herbert, D. T. (1993). Communities within cities: An urban social geography. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  16. Durose, C., & Lowndes, V. (2010). Neighbourhood governance: Contested rationales within a multi-level setting: A study of Manchester. Local Government Studies, 36, 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fisher, R. (1984). Let the people decide: Neighborhood organizing in America (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Garrioch, D., & Peel, M. (2006, July 1). Introduction: The social history of urban neighborhoods. Journal of Urban History, 32(5): 663–676.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144206287093.
  19. Hagedorn, J. M. (1991). Gangs, neighborhoods, and public policy. Social Problems, 38, 529–542. Google Scholar
  20. Hillery, G. A. (1968). Communal organizations: A study of local societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hojnacki, W. P. (1979). What is a neighborhood? Social Policy, 10(2), 47–52.Google Scholar
  22. Hooker, G. E. (1917, May). City planning and political areas. National Municipal Review, VI, 341–342.Google Scholar
  23. Hunter, A. (1979, March 1). The urban neighborhood its analytical and social contexts. Urban Affairs Review, 14(3), 267–288. https://dx.doi//:10.1177/107808747901400301.
  24. Jezierski, L. (1990, December 1). Neighborhoods and public-private partnerships in Pittsburgh. Urban Affairs Review, 26(2), 217–249.  https://doi.org/10.1177/004208169002600205.
  25. Jun, K.-N., & Musso, J. A. (2007). Explaining minority representation in place-based associations: Los Angeles neighborhood councils in context. Journal of Civil Society, 3(1), 39–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17448680701390737.
  26. Kadushin, C., & Jones, D. J. (1992). Social networks and urban neighborhoods in New York City. City & Society, 6(1), 58–75.  https://doi.org/10.1525/city.1992.6.1.58.
  27. Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighborhood governance. Public Administration, 86, 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Madanipour, A. (2001, April 1). How relevant is ‘planning by neighbourhoods’ today? The Town Planning Review, 72(2), 171–191.  https://doi.org/10.2307/40112446.
  29. Martin, D. G. (2003, September). ‘Place-framing’ as place-making: Constituting a neighborhood for organizing and activism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93(3), 730–750.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.9303011.
  30. McCann, E. J. (2003, April). Framing space and time in the city: Urban policy and the politics of spatial and temporal scale. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 159–178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00004.
  31. McKenzie, R. D. (1922, May 1). The neighborhood: A study of local life in the city of Columbus, Ohio—Concluded. American Journal of Sociology, 27(6), 780–799.Google Scholar
  32. McKnight, J. (2013, September 1). Neighborhood necessities: Seven functions that only effectively organized neighborhoods can provide. National Civic Review, 102(3), 22–24.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.21134.
  33. Meegan, R., & Mitchell, A. (2001, November 1). ‘It’s not community round here, it’s neighbourhood’: Neighbourhood change and cohesion in urban regeneration policies. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2167–2194.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087117.
  34. Miller, Z. (1981). The role and concept of neighborhood in American cities. In R. Fisher & P. Romanofsky (Eds.), Community organization for urban social change: A historical perspective (pp. 3–32). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  35. Miller, S. R. (2012, February 29). Legal neighborhoods (SSRN Scholarly Paper). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2013565.
  36. Neighbourhoods and communities—Social geographies—The social inclusion of certain groups in communities. https://sites.google.com/site/socialgeography1/neighbourhoods-and-communities. Accessed 16 July 2013.
  37. Newman, O. (1972). Defensible space: Crime prevention through urban design. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. New York City: The 51st state. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_City:_the_51st_State.
  39. NUSA—Neighborhoods U.S.A. http://www.nusa.org. Accessed 14 March 2014.
  40. Providence Public Schools, RI, & Rhode Island Coll. (1970). Providence. Neighborhoods. Curriculum guide, Grades K-3. Providence social studies curriculum project. S.l.: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse. Cited in Bursik, R. J., Jr., & Grasmick, H. G. (2002). Neighborhoods and crime: The dimensions of effective community control. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  41. Reinhardt, K. (2014). Theaster Gates’s Dorchester projects in Chicago. Journal of Urban History.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0096144214563507.
  42. Rose, D. R. (2000). Social disorganization and parochial control: Religious institutions and their communities. Sociological Forum, 15, 339–358.Google Scholar
  43. Sampson, R. J. (2011). Great American City: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Scharlach, A. (2012). Creating aging-friendly communities in the United States. Ageing International, 37, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schwartz, E. A., & Institute for the Study of Civic Values. (1982). The neighborhood agenda. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Civic Values. Philadelphia’s Neighborhood Transformation Initiative can be found at http://www.phila.gov/ohcd/conplan31/strategy.pdf.
  46. Silva, J. (2013). Coming up short: Working-class adulthood in an age of uncertainty. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simkhovitch, M. K. (1926). The settlement primer, Boston. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015005273860.
  48. Simkhovitch, M. K. (c.1938). My story of Greenwich House (1st ed.). New York: W. W. Norton. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015027424558.
  49. Stanley Isaacs. (1945). President of the Board of Directors of United Neighborhood Houses, commenting on a MOMA exhibit on neighborhood planning. http://www.moma.org/pdfs/docs/press_archives/928/releases/MOMA_1944_0014_1944-03-28_44328-12.pdf. Accessed 25 February 2014.
  50. Steiner, J. F. (1930, June). Is the neighborhood a safe unit for community planning? Social Forces, 8(4), 492–493 (University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
  51. Svara, J. (2003). Two decades of continuity and change in American city councils. Washington, DC: National League of Cities. http://docplayer.net/145973-Two-decades-of-continuity-and-change-in-american-city-councils.html.
  52. Trager, J. (2004). The New York chronology: The ultimate compendium of events, people and anecdotes from the Dutch to the present. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  53. University of Washington, University Extension Division. (1912). The social and civic center. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/loc.ark:/13960/t23b6sb8v.
  54. Woods, W. K. (1988, September 1). Neighborhood innovations. National Civic Review, 77(5), 473–475.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100770511.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emily Talen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations