Advertisement

Informal Urbanism and the American City

  • Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris
  • Vinit Mukhija
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter argues that informal or unregulated activities are pervasive and spread across different social groups, diverse urban settings, and geographic regions of the Global North. While formal and informal activities may at times conflict with each other, urban designers need to question the conventional duality of informal and formal urbanism and conceive of them as linked, overlapping, and often mutually sustaining. This attitude or approach can open up avenues and opportunities for urban designers to respond to urban informality. The authors suggest that casting a spatial lens on informality can offer a guiding framework covering four distinct areas of urban design: scope, context, process, and practice.

References

  1. Banham, R., Barker, P., Hall, P., & Price, C. (1969). Non-plan: An experiment in freedom. New Society, 13(338), 435–443.Google Scholar
  2. Beneria, L., & Feldman, S. (Eds.). (1992). Unequal burden: Economic crises, persistent poverty, and women’s work. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bernhardt, A., Boushey, H., Dresser, L., & Tilly, C. (2008). The gloves-off economy: Workplace standards at the bottom of America’s labor market. Champaign, IL: Labor and Employment Relations Association.Google Scholar
  4. Bromley, R. (1978). Introduction—The urban informal sector: Why is it worth discussing? World Development, 2(9/10), 1034–1035.Google Scholar
  5. Browne, G., Dominie, W., & Mayerson, K. (2014). “Keep your wheels on”: Mediating informality in the food cart industry. In V. Mukhija & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), The informal American city: Beyond taco trucks and day labor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Campo, D. (2002). Brooklyn’s vernacular waterfront. Journal of Urban Design, 7(2), 171–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Campo, D. (2013). The accidental playground: Brooklyn waterfront narratives of the undesigned and unplanned. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castells, M., & Portes, A. (1989). World underneath: The origins, dynamics, and effects of the informal economy. In A. Portes, M. Castells, & L. A. Benton (Eds.), The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries (pp. 11–37). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar
  9. Chase, J., Crawford, M., & Kaliski, J. (Eds.). (2008). Everyday urbanism. New York: Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
  10. Crawford, M. (1995). Contesting the public realm: Struggles over public space in Los Angeles. Journal of Architectural Education, 49(1), 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, M. (2008). Blurring the boundaries: Public space and private life. In J. Chase, M. Crawford, & J. Kaliski (Eds.), Everyday urbanism (pp. 22–35). New York: Monacelli Press.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, G. (2013). Do-it-yourself urban design: The social practice of informal ‘improvement’ through unauthorized alteration. City and Community, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12029.
  13. Ferman, P., & Ferman, L. A. (1973). The structural underpinnings of the irregular economy. Poverty and Human Resources Abstracts, 8(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
  14. Franck, K. A., & Stevens, Q. (Eds.). (2007). Loose space: Possibility and diversity in urban life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Gowan, T. (2009). New hobos or neoromantic fantasy? Urban ethnography beyond the neoliberal disconnect. Qualitative Sociology, 32(3), 231–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hart, K. (1973). Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 11(1), 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. (2001). Domestica: Immigrant workers cleaning and caring in the shadow of affluence. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hopper, K. (2003). Reckoning with homelessness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hou, J. (Ed.). (2010). Insurgent public space: Guerilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hou, J. (2011). Citizen design: Participation and beyond. In T. Banerjee & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), Companion to urban design (pp. 329–340). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hou, J., & Kinoshita, I. (2007). Bridging community differences through informal processes: Reexamining participatory practices in Seattle and Matsudo. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(3), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ILO. (1972). Employment, income and inequality: A strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  23. Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  24. Kamel, N. (2014). Learning from the margin: Placemaking tactics. In V. Mukhija & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), The informal American city: Beyond taco trucks and day labor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kinder, K. (2016). DIY detroit: Making do in a city without services. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lerner, J. (2014). Urban acupuncture. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Linovski, O., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2013). Evolution of urban design plans in U.S. and Canada: What do the plans tell us about urban design practice? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 33(1), 66–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2012). Addressing the challenges of urban landscapes: Normative goals for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(4), 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Ehrenfeucht, R. (2009). Sidewalks: Conflict and negotiation over public space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Mukhija, V. (2016). Responding to informality through urban design studio pedeagogy. Journal of Urban Design, 21(5), 577–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morales, A. (2010). Planning and the self-organization of marketplaces. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 30(2), 182–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moser, C. (1978). Informal sector or petty commodity production: Dualism or dependence in urban development? World Development, 6(9/10), 1041–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mukhija, V., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (Eds.). (2014). The informal American city: Beyond taco trucks and day labor. Cambridge, MA and London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mukhija, V., & Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2015). Reading the informal city: Why and how to deepen planers’ understanding of informality. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 35(4), 444–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mukhija, V., & Mason, D. (2015). Resident-owned, informal mobile home communities in rural California: Lessons from Rancho Don Antonio, Coachella Valley. Housing Policy Debate, 25(1), 179–194.Google Scholar
  36. Ogbu, L. (2012). Reframing practice: Identifying a framework for social impact design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(4), 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peattie, L. (1987). An idea in good currency and how it grew: The informal sector. World Development, 15(7), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Portes, A., & Sassen-Koob, S. (1987). Making it underground: Comparative material on the informal sector in Western market economies. The American Journal of Sociology, 93(1), 30–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Portes, A., Castells, M., & Benton, L. (Eds.). (1989). The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rakowski, C. (1994). Convergence and divergence in the informal sector debate: A focus on Latin America, 1984–92. World Development, 22(4), 501–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rios, M. (2014). Learning from informal practices: Implications for urban design. In V. Mukhija & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Eds.), The informal American city: Beyond taco trucks and day labor. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  42. Robeyns, I. (2006). The capability approach in practice. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(3), 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Roy, A. (2005). Urban informality: Toward an epistemology of planning. Journal of American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sadler, S. (1998). The situationist city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sanyal, B. (1988). The urban informal sector revisited: Some notes on the relevance of the concept in the 1980s. Third World Planning Review, 10(1), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, Tokyo, London. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Sassen-Koob, S. (1989). New York city’s informal economy. In A. Portes, M. Castells, & L. A. Benton (Eds.), The informal economy: Studies in advanced and less developed countries (pp. 60–77). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Sen, A. (1985). Commodities and capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  49. Sennett, R. (2008). The uses of disorder: Personal identity and city life. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Stevens, Q. (2007). The ludic city: Exploring the potential of public space. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Valenzuela, A. (2003). Day labor work. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valenzuela, A., Theodore, N., Melendez, E., & Gonzalez, A. L. (2006). On the corner: Day labor in the United States. Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Urban Poverty.Google Scholar
  53. Venkatesh, S. A. (2009). Off the books: The underground economy of the urban poor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Venturi, R., Brown, D. S., & Izenour, S. (1972). Learning from Las Vegas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ward, P. M. (1999). Colonias and public policy in Texas and Mexico: Urbanization by stealth. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wilson, E. (1991). The Sphinx in the city: Urban life, the control of disorder, and women. London: Virago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris
    • 1
  • Vinit Mukhija
    • 1
  1. 1.UCLA Luskin School of Public AffairsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations