Advertisement

Privilege and Participation: On the Democratic Implications and Social Contradictions of Bottom-Up Urbanisms

  • Gordon C. C. DouglasEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter complicates some common assumptions about the social value of bottom-up urbanism, arguing that, in practice, it is not always the democratizing force it is often heralded to be in progressive planning circles. The phenomenon ultimately embodies many of the contradictions of the neoliberal city. Drawing from a database of recent cases from across the United States, the author examines both wholly unauthorized or illegal interventions and those that are formally sanctioned but are nonetheless informal and participatory in implementation. The realities of who can and does take part in both types of streetscape intervention, and the types of spaces that typically result, reveal persistent social inequalities in urban space and participatory citizenship.

Keywords

Creative placemaking DIY urbanism Tactical urbanism Guerrilla urbanism Generous urbanism Latino urbanism Ethnic urbanism Public space Vigilante Neoliberalism Creative class Gentrification Speed bumps Bike lanes Inequality Privilege Participation Democracy 

References

  1. Alkon, A. H., & McCullen, C. G. (2011). Whiteness and farmers markets: Performances, perpetuations… contestations? Antipode, 43(4), 937–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (1990). Streetwise: Race, class, and change in an urban community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the streets. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  4. Baum, J. (2016, August 7). New Lincoln Avenue parklet sparks complaints, confusion. Mercury News. www.mercurynews.com/2016/08/02/san-jose-new-lincoln-avenue-parklet-sparks-complaints-confusion/. Accessed February 13, 2017.
  5. Brunson, R. K. (2007). ‘Police don’t like Black people’: African-American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6, 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catungal, J. P., Leslie, D., & Hii, Y. (2009). Geographies of displacement in the creative city: The case of liberty village, Toronto. Urban Studies, 46(5&6), 1095–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CBS4 Denver. (2011, September 28). Slow down! Homeowners cited for making own speedbumps. CBS4 Denver. http://denver.cbslocal.com/2011/09/28/slow-down-homeowners-cited-for-making-own-speed-bumps/. Accessed February 16, 2017.
  8. Cho, C. (2013). Parklet boosts local business sales. KOMU 8 News website, 3 October. http://www.komu.com/news/parklet-boosts-local-business-sales/. Accessed March 27, 2014.
  9. Coreil-Allen, G. (2010). The typology of new public sites: A field guide to invisible public space. Baltimore: Self-Published.Google Scholar
  10. Correia, M. (2010). Determinants of attitudes toward police of Latino immigrants and non-immigrants. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(1), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dottolo, A. L., & Stewart, A. J. (2008). ‘Don’t ever forget now, you’re a Black man in America’: Intersections of race, class and gender in encounters with the police. Sex Roles, 59, 350–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Douglas, G. C. C. (2014). Do-it-yourself urban design: The social practice of informal ‘improvement’ through unauthorized alteration. City & Community, 13(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Douglas, G. C. C. (2016). The formalities of informal improvement: Technical and scholarly knowledge at work in do-it-yourself urban design. City & Community, 9(2), 117–134.Google Scholar
  14. Douglas, G. C. C. (2018). The help-yourself city: Legitimacy and inequality in DIY urbanism. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feagin, J., & Sikes, M. (1994). Living with racism: The black middle class experience. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  16. Finn, D. (2014). DIY urbanism: Opportunities and challenges for planners. The Journal of Urbanism, 7(4), 381–398.Google Scholar
  17. Franklin, A., Boyd-Franklin, N., & Kelly, S. (2006). Racism and invisibility: Race-related stress, emotional abuse, and psychological trauma for people of color. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 6, 9–30.Google Scholar
  18. Guiney, A., & Crain, B. (Eds.). (2011). By the city/for the city: An atlas of possibility for the future of New York. New York: The Institute for Urban Design/Multi-Story Books.Google Scholar
  19. Hajnal, Z., & Trounstine, J. (2014). Identifying and understanding perceived inequities in local politics. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 56–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho, C. L. (Commissioner). (2012, August–November). Spontaneous interventions: Design actions for the common good exhibition. United States Pavilion, 13th Venice International Biennale of Architecture, Venice.Google Scholar
  21. Ho, C. L., & Douglas, G. (Eds.). (2012). Spontaneous interventions: Design actions for the common good. Catalogue for the exhibition of the same name. Washington, DC: Architect/Hanley Wood.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffmann, M. L. (2016). Bike lanes are white lanes: Bicycle advocacy and urban planning. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hoffmann, M. L., & Lugo, A. (2014). Who is ‘world class’? Transportation justice and bicycle policy. Urbanites, 4(1), 45–61.Google Scholar
  24. Idov, M. (2010, April 11). Clash of the bearded ones: Hipsters, Hasids, and the Williamsburg street. New York Magazine. http://nymag.com/realestate/neighborhoods/2010/65356/. Accessed February 14, 2017.
  25. Iveson, K. (2013). Cities within the city: Do-it-yourself urbanism and the right to the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 941–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lydon, M., & Garcia, A. (2015). Tactical urbanism: Short-term action for long-term change. Washington, D.C.: Island.Google Scholar
  27. MacGregor, H. (2014, February 12). My neighborhood parking wars: Midnight vigilantes and Phantom Valets battle over the curbs of one LA street. Zocalo Public Square. http://www.zocalopublicsquare.org/2014/02/12/my-neighborhood-parking-wars/ideas/nexus/. Accessed February 16, 2017.
  28. Markusen, A., & Gadwa, A. (2010). Creative placemaking. White paper for the Mayors’ Institute on City Design. Washington, DC: The National Endowment for the Arts.Google Scholar
  29. Menjivar, C., & Bejarano, C. (2004). Latino immigrants’ perceptions of crime and police authorities in the United States: A case study from the Phoenix metropolitan area. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 120–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Merker, B. (2010). Taking place: Rebar’s Absurd Tactics in generous urbanism. In J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Michelson, M. R. (2003). The corrosive effect of acculturation: How Mexican Americans lose political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 918–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pilaar, D. (2015, February 27). Mapping all 51 awesome San Francisco Parklets. Curbed San Francisco. http://sf.curbed.com/maps/mapping-all-51-awesome-san-francisco-public-parklets. Accessed April 8, 2016.
  33. Pool, B., & Chong, J.-R. (2005, April 26). Contrarians at the gates go to some heights to make a point. Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/2005/apr/26/local/me-guerrilla26. Accessed February 16, 2017.
  34. Project for Public Spaces. (2015, June 13). Creative communities and arts-based placemaking. Project for Public Spaces. https://www.pps.org/reference/creative-communities-and-arts-based-placemaking/. Accessed February 28, 2017.
  35. Rebar Group. (2012). About Park(ing) Day. Park(ing)Day.org. http://parkingday.org/about-parking-day/. Accessed February 27, 2017.
  36. Rios, M. (2010). Claiming Latino space: Cultural insurgency in the public realm. In J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Rojas, J. (2010). Latino urbanism in Los Angeles: A model for urban improvisation and reinvention. In J. Hou (Ed.), Insurgent public space: Guerrilla urbanism and the remaking of contemporary cities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Roth, M. (2010, November 2). From Park(ing) Day to permit: San Francisco’s Parklets redefine public space. Streetsblog SF. http://sf.streetsblog.org/2010/11/02/from-parking-day-to-permit-san-franciscos-parklets-redefine-public-space/. Accessed February 27, 2017.
  39. Schumaker, Paul, D., & Getter, R. W. (1977). Responsiveness bias in 51 American communities. American Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 247–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sharp, J., Pollock, V., & Paddison, R. (2005). Just art for a just city: Public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5–6), 1001–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Visconti, L. M., Sherry, J. F., Jr., Borghini, S., & Anderson, L. (2010). Street art, sweet art? Reclaiming the ‘public’ in public space. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Walker, A. (2014). Why people keep trying to erase the Hollywood Sign from Google Maps. Gizmodo, 21 November 2014. http://gizmodo.com/why-people-keep-trying-to-erase-the-hollywood-sign-from-1658084644. Accessed November 22, 2014.
  43. Weitzer, R., & Tuch, S. A. (2002). Perceptions of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology, 40(2), 435–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.San José State UniversitySan JoséUSA

Personalised recommendations