Skip to main content

Ways to Improve Tactical S&OP

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implementing Integrated Business Planning

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

  • 2556 Accesses

Abstract

Tactical S&OP process can be visualized like in Fig. 3.18. In this big chapter, we bring to you a lot use cases which can help in your maturity assessment, design, and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The square root of MSE is an approximation for standard deviation. This is based on the assumption that forecast errors are normally distributed with the mean of zero. The probability determines the z value. For example, z takes on the value ~1.64 for 95% probability. Therefore, the 95% prediction interval would be calculated by multiplying 1.64 and √MSE (calculated using the test or holdout dataset).

  2. 2.

    The graph was created in Excel using a two-step process. Step 1: using functions RAND and NORM.INV to simulate forecast values for various random probabilities. Step 2: using PERCENTILE function, calculate the lower and upper range for a given prediction interval (say, range between 2.5th percentile and 97.5th percentile gives the lower and upper bounds for 95% prediction interval).

  3. 3.

    For the benefit of the heuristic method, and given that in-house production is the preferred sourcing option, quotas were maintained in master data in such a way that 100% was allocated to in-house production.

  4. 4.

    Please note that remaining steady does not mean low variability. It just means the behavior of these factors do not change significantly over time.

References

  • APICS – Module 2.G – Influencing and prioritizing demand (2015) APICS – module 2.G – Influencing and prioritizing demand. APICS.

    Google Scholar 

  • APICS – Module 3.D – Implementation of demand plans (2015) APICS – Module 3.D – Implementation of demand plans. APICS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, T. (2014). Manage uncertainty and product mix to improve demand management in life sciences. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S. (2002). Benchmarks for new product forecast errors. Innovation, (December), pp. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronow, S., & Jr, R. B. (2011, April). Understanding trade-offs: A practical supply chain cost-service analysis framework and maturity model. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkett, M. (2016). The hierarchy of new product introduction metrics: Grow with new products while managing complexity. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursa, K. L. (2014). Achieving demand planning excellence. European Business Review. http://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/achieving-demand-planning-excellence/?_sm_au_=irVrqWHpvD54L5PP.

  • Chase, C. W. (2009). Demand-driven forecasting: A structured approach to forecasting. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=iVIbAAAAQBAJ&pgis=1.

  • Crum, C., & Palmatier, G. E. (2003). Demand management best practices: Process, principles, and collaboration. Oliver Wight, APICS. http://books.google.at/books?id=6l3iWbGM-54C.

  • Davis, M. (2011). Customer value analytics for supply chain segmentation. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2012). Design the right form of supply chain segmentation for your business. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demand Classification. (2017). Frepple.com

  • Erhun, F., Gonçalves, P., & Hopman, J. (2007). The art of managing new product transitions. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48, 73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Superforecasting: The art and science of prediction. New York Times Bestseller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, K. B. (2014). Solving the problems of new product forecasting. Business Horizons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepczynski, R., Jandhyala, R., Sankaran, G., & Dimofte, A. (2018a). Integrated business planning – How to integrate planning processes, organizational structures & capabilities, and leverage SAP IBP technology. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis, S., & Hibon, M. (2000). The M3 competition: Results, conclusions, and implications. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(4), 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer Jr J. T., & Moon, M. A. (2004). Sales forecasting management. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M. A. (2013). Demand and supply integration: The key to world-class demand forecasting. FT Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=2M9njA9JcMgC&pgis=1.

  • Mulllick Satinder, K. (1971). Tecnique, How to choose the right forecasting. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, G. E., & Crum, C. (2003). Enterprise sales and operations planning: Synchronizing demand, supply and resources for peak performance. J Ross Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penafiel, W. (2016). How to design a demand planning process. MeetLogistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (n.d.). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinmuth, J. E. (1974). Forecasting the impact of a new product introduction. J.E. JAMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salley, A. (2013). Building demand management excellence at danone. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, J. (2013). Next-generation forecasting is closer than you might think. SupplyChainBrain, 17(5), 52. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=91637369&site=eds-live.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steutermann, S. (2010). Demand planning excellence. AMR Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steutermann, S. (2016b). Demand forecasting leads the list of challenges impacting customer service across industries. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steutermann, S., & Suleski, J. (2016). Take six actions to improve product life cycle management in consumer products. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steutermann, S., Salley, A., & Lord, P. (2012a). Demand management elevates value network performance. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steutermann, S., Scott, F., & Tohamy, N. (2012b). Building an effective demand-planning process. Gartner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, M. (2001). Participative sales and operations planning. MIOM, SM Thacker & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, R. (2014). Sales forecasting and demand management. Delos Partnership.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kepczynski, R., Ghita, A., Jandhyala, R., Sankaran, G., Boyle, A. (2019). Ways to Improve Tactical S&OP. In: Implementing Integrated Business Planning. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90095-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics