Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter further highlights several clinical and practical areas of physical health, discussed in previous chapters, affecting adults with intellectual disability, along with the associated health disparities. Adults with intellectual disability can be defined as a ‘medically underserved population’ especially those transitioning from childhood to adult services. Research, health promotion and wellness, development of national service frameworks remain areas of future advancement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Aging friendly communities’ initiatives are when communities recognize that they are composed of a significant number of older citizens, and consequently develop and carry out plans to make their physical and social amenities and other aspects completely accessible and available to their older citizens. This may involve physical barrier removal in public and private facilities, transportation resources, and streets and sidewalks; social resource investment to develop and maintain programs and facilities for the well elderly; and provide more control in the hands of its older citizens over the physical and social fabric of their community.

References

  1. Bakken TL, Martinsen H. Adults with intellectual disabilities and mental illness in psychiatric inpatient units: empirical studies of patient characteristics and psychiatric diagnoses from 1996 to 2011. Int J Dev Disabil. 2013;59:179–90. https://doi.org/10.1179/2047387712Y.0000000006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson P, Prasher VP, Janicki M. Mental health, intellectual disabilities, and the aging process. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Gomez A, Ismet K. Psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disabilities: A preliminary study of prevalence and associated factors. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;41(Suppl):S158–9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kyrkou M. Health issues and quality of life in women with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2005;49:770–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh P, Heller T. Women’s health and intellectual disabilities. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Wisdom JP, McGee MG, Horner-Johnson W, Michael YL, Adams E, Berlin M. Health disparities between women with and without disabilities: A review of the research. Soc Work Public Health. 2010;25:368–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Edgerton R. Quality of life issues: Some people know how to be old. In: Seltzer MM, Krauss MW, Janicki MP, editors. Life Course Perspectives on Adulthood and Old Age. Washington, D.C.: American Association on Mental Retardation; 1994. p. 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Public Law 101-336. 108th Congress, 2nd session July 26, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olmstead Rights. The Olmstead supreme court decision in a nutshell. Accessed from: https://www.olmsteadrights.org/about-olmstead/.

  10. Felce D. Community living for adults with intellectual disabilities: Unravelling the cost effectiveness discourse. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2017;14:187–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/jppi.12180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Health Resources Services Administration (HRSA). (2016). Medically underserved areas and populations (MUA/Ps). Accessed from: https://bhw.hrsa.gov/shortage-designation/muap.

  12. US Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Closing the gap: A national blue-print for improving the health of individuals with mental retardation. Report of the Surgeon General’s Conference on Health Disparities and Mental Retardation. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  13. US Department of Health and Human Services. The Surgeon General’s call to action to improve the health and wellness of persons with disabilities. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Council on Disability. The current state of health care for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Council on Disability; 2009. Accessed from https://www.ncd.gov/rawmedia_repository/0d7c848f_3d97_43b3_bea5_36e1d97f973d.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  15. Slashcheva L, Rader R, Sulkes SB. Would people with intellectual disabilities benefit for being designated “underserved”? AMA J Ethics. 2016;18:422–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHHD). Loan repayment program. Accessed from: https://www.nimhd.nih.gov/programs/extramural/loan-repayment.html.

  17. Susan G. Komen for the Cure. (2018). Research and community health grants. Accessed from: https://ww5.komen.org/ResearchGrants/ResearchandGrants.html.

  18. Ackerman BM. People with intellectual disabilities must be designated a medical underserved population. Spec Care Dentist. 2013;33:207–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. American Medical Association. (2010). Designation of the intellectually disabled as a medically underserved population (resolution 805-I-10). Accessed from https://www.ama-assn.org/sites/default/files/media-browser/public/about-ama/councils/Council%20Reports/council-on-medical-service/i11-cms-value-based-decision-making.pdf.

  20. American Dental Association. (2004). State and community models for improving access to dental care for the underserved—a white paper. Accessed from: http://www.ada.org/~/media/ADA/Advocacy/Files/topics_access_whitepaper.ashx.

  21. Kornblau BL. The case for designating people with intellectual and developmental disabilities as a medically underserved population. In:Autistic Self Advocacy Network Policy Brief, April 2014. Florida: A&M University; 2014. p. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ally S, Boyd K, Abells D, Amaria K, Hamdani Y, Loh A, Niel U, Sacks S, Shea S, Sullivan WF, Hennen B. Improving transition to adulthood for adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Can Fam Physician. 2018;64(Suppl 2):S37–43.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. National Alliance to Advance Adolescent Health. (2018). Got transition. Accessed from: http://www.gottransition.org/.

  24. Child Neurology Foundation. (2018). Transition of care. Accessed from: http://www.childneurologyfoundation.org/transitions/.

  25. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. (2017). Transitioning to adult care: supporting youth with special healthcare needs. Accessed from: https://policylab.chop.edu/evidence-action-brief/transitioning-adult-care-supporting-youth-special-health-care-needs.

  26. Betz CL, Nehring WM. Transition needs of parents of adolescents and emerging adults with special health care needs and disabilities. J Fam Nurs. 2015;21:362–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oswald DP, Gilles DL, Cannady MS, Wenzel DB, Willis JH, Bodurtha JN. Youth with special health care needs: Transition to adult health care services. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17:1744–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Carfi A, Berbabei R, Onesimo R, Zampino G, Onder G. Managing the care of adults with Down’s syndrome. BMJ. 2014;349:g5596. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g5596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ervin, D., Hahn, J. & Asato, M. Transitioning to adult neurologic care: Where do we go from here? Exceptional Parent, 2017;47(8):38–9.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Smith GF, Berg JM. Down’s anomaly. In: Smith GF, Berg JM, editors. Dermatoglyphs. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1976. p. 76–99.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rafii MS, Wishnek H, Brewer JB, Donohue MC, Ness S, Mobley WC, Aisen PS, Rissman RA. The Down syndrome biomarker initiative (DSBI) pilot: proof of concept for deep phenotyping of Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in down syndrome. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9:239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00239. Epub 2015 Sep 14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Evenhuis, H., & Nagtzaam, L.M.D. (1998). IASSID International Consensus Statement: Early identification of hearing and visual impairment in children and adults with an intellectual disability. IASSID Special Interest Research Group on Health Issues. Accessed from: https://www.iassidd.org/uploads/legacy/pdf/consensir.alg.doc.

  33. Janicki MP, Heller T, Seltzer G, Hogg J. Practice guidelines for the clinical assessment and care management of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias among adults with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1996;40:374–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jokinen J, Janicki MP, Keller SM, McCallion P, Force LT, the National Task Group on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia Practices. Guidelines for structuring community care and supports for people with intellectual disabilities affected by dementia. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2013;10(1):1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 5th ed. Washington D.C.: Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Moran JA, Rafii MS, Keller SM, Singh BK, Janicki MP. The National Task Group on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia Practices consensus recommendations for the evaluation and management of dementia in adults with intellectual disabilities. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:831–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Evenhuis H, Henderson CM, Beange H, Lennox N, Chicoine B. Healthy ageing – adults with intellectual disabilities: physical health issues. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2001;14:175–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hogg J, Lucchino R, Wang KY, Janicki M. Healthy ageing - adults with intellectual disabilities: ageing and social policy. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2001;14:229–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Thorpe L, Davidson P, Janicki MP. Healthy Ageing - adults with intellectual disabilities: behavioural issues. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2001;14:218–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Walsh PN, Heller T, Schupf N, van Schronjenstein Lantman-de Valk H. Healthy ageing – Adults with intellectual disabilities: women’s health and related issues. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2001;14:195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. World Health Organization. Healthy ageing – adults with intellectual disabilities: summative report. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2001;14:256–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Heller T, Janicki MP, Gill C, Factor A. Health disparities and a paradigm for health promotion: Report of the invitational symposium on health, aging, and developmental disabilities. Chicago: University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Human Development and Disability; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Janicki MP, Henderson CM, Rubin L. Neurodevelopmental conditions and aging: Report on the Atlanta Study Group Charrette on Neurodevelopmental Conditions and Aging. Disabil Health J. 2008;1:116–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Watchman, K., & Janicki, M.P., and the members of the International Summit of Intellectual Disability and Dementia. The intersection of intellectual disability and Dementia: Report of the International Summit on Intellectual Disability and Dementia. Gerontologist. 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx160.

  45. Lee N-C, Chien Y-H, Hwu W-L. A review of biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease in Down syndrome. Neurol Ther. 2017;6(Suppl 1):69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Manti S, Cutrupi MC, Cuppari C, Ferro E, Dipasquale V, Di Rosa G, Chimenz R, La Rosa M, Valenti A, Salpietro V. Inflammatory biomarkers and intellectual disability in patients with Down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62:382–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Special Olympics Oregon. (2018). Welcome to Oregon team wellness. Accessed from: http://www.soor.org/Sub-Page.aspx?Name=History&PID=28.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Prasher, V.P., Janicki, M.P., Keller, S.M. (2019). Future Prospects: A Challenge to Promote Wellness. In: Prasher, V., Janicki, M. (eds) Physical Health of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90083-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90083-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90082-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90083-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics