Abstract
Background: Positive, or healthy, personality development is a strong predictor of major lifelong adaptive processes and outcomes across different functioning domains. Consequently, the systematic promotion of healthy personality in children and adolescents via education contexts and practices is an imperative for contemporary societies. There is a growing consensus about the need for societies to shift from a paradigm of conventional schooling to person-centered schools. Structural features of person-centered schools include (a) a conception of individuals as whole persons, (b) an emphasis on subjective experience and on processes, (c) centrality of positive relationships, and (d) an emphasis on positive features of psychobiological functioning. This shift may be perceived as intangible, or as implying abrupt and disruptive changes. However, the promotion of healthy personality development in schools is not a question of all or nothing, but rather a continuum. Further, there are a substantial number of schools already promoting healthy or positive development, even if unintentionally or via means of processes and constructs more typical of school and educational traditions. Aims: We argue that student engagement with school is a paradigmatic example of a narrower expression of personality in the education and school context. We aim to describe how the promotion of healthy personality development is possible within the context of current educational practices, including school improvement efforts to reach educational excellence and equity. Conclusions: As an expression of personality, student engagement with school is a process that is malleable to intervention and particularly sensitive to interpersonal influences (including teacher-students relationships). Student engagement with school is, therefore, an example of how personality and educational constructs can be integrated into effective educational and school practices, including in school improvement and re-restructuring efforts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ainscow, M., Dyson, A., Goldrick, S., & West, M. (2013). Developing equitable education systems. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ainscow, M., & Sandill, A. (2010). Developing inclusive education systems: The role of organisational cultures and leadership. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(4), 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110802504903
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Archambault, I., Pagani, L. S., & Fitzpatrick, C. (2013). Transactional associations between classroom engagement and relations with teachers from first through fourth grade. Learning and Instruction, 23(23), 1–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.003
Baker, J. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher-child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44(3), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.02.002
Baker, J. A., Grant, S., & Morlock, L. (2008). The teacher-student relationship as a developmental context for children with internalizing or externalizing behavior problems. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(1), 3–15.
Becker, B. E., & Luthar, S. S. (2002). Social-emotional factors affecting achievement outcomes among disadvantaged students: Closing the achievement gap. Educational Psychologist, 37(4), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3704_1
Berry, B., & Eckert, J. (2012). Creating teacher incentives for school excellence and equity. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved [04/04/2019] from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/creating-teacher-incentives
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.001
Cavendish, W. (2013). Student perceptions of school efforts to facilitate student involvement, school commitment, self-determination, and high school graduation. Social Psychology of Education, 16(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-013-9212-z
Chen, X., Chang, L., Liu, H., & He, Y. (2008). Effects of the peer group on the development of social functioning and academic achievement: A longitudinal study in Chinese children. Child Development, 79(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01123.x
Cloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling good: The science of well-being. New York, NY: Oxford.
Cloninger, C. R. (2009). Evolution of human brain functions: The functional structure of human consciousness. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 43(11), 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.3109/00048670903270506
Cloninger, C. R. (2013). The importance of ternary awareness for overcoming the inadequacies of contemporary psychiatry. Revista de Psiquiatria Clínica, 40(3), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832013000300006
Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1993). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50(12), 975–990. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240059008
Dias, A., Oliveira, J., & Moreira, P. A. S. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the school improvement teacher survey. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 4(2), 163–184.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00725.x
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fullarton, S. (2002). Student engagement with school: Individual and school-level influences. SAY Research Reports. Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth Research Report, 27, 1–43.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
Garcia, D., Lundström, S., Brändström, S., Råstam, M., Cloninger, C. R., Kerekes, N., … Anckarsäter, H. (2013). Temperament and character in the Child and Adolescent Twin Study in Sweden (CATSS): Comparison to the general population, and genetic structure analysis. PLoS One, 8(8), e70475.
Gut, J., Reimann, G., & Grob, A. (2013). A contextualized view on long-term predictors of academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 436. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031503
Hofman, R. H., Dijkstra, N. J., & Hofman, W. H. A. (2009). School self-evaluation and student achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802664115
Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O.-M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.1
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
Law, P. C., Cuskelly, M., & Carroll, A. (2013). Young people’s perceptions of family, peer, and school connectedness and their impact on adjustment. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 23(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2012.19
Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040002353
Lee, V. E., Dedrick, R. F., & Smith, J. B. (1991). The effect of the social organization of schools on teachers’ efficacy and satisfaction. Sociology of Education, 64, 190–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112851
Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68(4), 241–270.
Lee, V. E. (2000). Using hierarchical linear modeling to study social contexts: The case of school effects. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3502_6
Liew, J., Chen, Q., & Hughes, J. N. (2010). Child effortful control, teacher–student relationships, and achievement in academically at-risk children: Additive and interactive effects. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.07.005
Moreira, P. A., Oliveira, J. T., Cloninger, K. M., Azevedo, C., Sousa, A., Castro, J., & Cloninger, C. R. (2012). The psychometrics and validity of the junior temperament and character inventory in Portuguese adolescents. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 53(8), 1227–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.04.014
Moreira, P. A. S., Cloninger, K., & Garcia, D. (2019). Person-centered schools. In D. Garcia, T. Archer & R.M. Kostrzewa (Eds.), Personality and Brain Disorders: Associations and Interventions. Springer.
Moreira, P. A. S., & Dias, M. A. (2018). Tests of factorial structure and measurement invariance for the Student Engagement Instrument: Evidence from middle and high school students. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2017.1414004
Moreira, P. A. S., Dias, A., Matias, C., Castro, J., Gaspar, T., & Oliveira, J. (2018). School effects on students’ engagement with school: Academic performance moderates the effect of school support for learning on students’ engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.07.007
Moreira, P. A. S., Dias, P., Vaz, F. M., & Vaz, J. M. (2013). Predictors of academic performance and school engagement: Integrating persistence, motivation and study skills perspectives using person-centered and variable-centered approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 24(2), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.016
Moreira, P. A. S., Dias, P. C., Vaz, F. M., Rocha, C., Monteiro, J., & Vaz, J. M. (2013). Escolas secundárias Portuguesas com melhores e piores resultados académicos: dimensões do aluno, da família e da escola [Portuguese secondary schools with best and worst academic performance indicators: Student, family and school dimensions]. Revista de Psicologia da Criança e do Adolescente/Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 3(1), 81–121.
Moreira, P. A. S., Oliveira, J. T., Dias, P., Vaz, F. M., & Torres-Oliveira, I. (2014). The students’ perceptions of school Success Promoting Strategies Inventory (SPSI): Development and validity evidence based studies. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E61. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.62
Moreira, P. A. S., Vaz, F., Dias, P., & Petracchi, P. (2009). Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the School Engagement Instrument. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 24(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573509346680
Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(3), 376–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608322940
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Makes Schools Successful? Resources, Policies and Practices (Volume IV). PISA, OECD Publishing.
Osher, D., Sprague, J., Weissberg, R. P., Axelrod, J., Keenan, S., Kendziora, K., & Zins, J. E. (2008). A comprehensive approach to promoting social, emotional, and academic growth in contemporary schools. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology V (Vol. 4, pp. 1263–1278). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Pereira, M., & Reis, H. (2012). Diferenças regionais no desempenho dos alunos portugueses: evidência do Programa PISA da OCDE. Boletim Económico–Inverno–Banco de Portugal, (2), 59–83.
Pereira, M. C., & Reis, H. (2014). Retenção escolar no ensino básico em Portugal: determinantes e impacto no desempenho dos estudantes. Boletim Económico–Inverno–Banco de Portugal, 63, 63–87.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on Students’ School engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
Rubie-Davies, C. M., Flint, A., & McDonald, L. G. (2012). Teacher beliefs, teacher characteristics, and school contextual factors: What are the relationships? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 270–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02025.x
Rudasill, K. M. (2011). Child temperament, teacher–child interactions, and teacher–child relationships: A longitudinal investigation from first to third grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.07.002
Rudasill, K. M., Reio, T. J., Stipanovic, N., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). A longitudinal study of student-teacher relationship quality, difficult temperament, and risky behavior from childhood to early adolescence. Journal of School Psychology, 48(5), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.05.001
Schargel, F., & Smink, J. (2004). Helping students graduate: A strategic approach to dropout prevention. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315854816
Sanson, A., Hemphill, S. A., & Smart, D. (2004). Connections between temperament and social development: A review. Social Development, 13, 142–170. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9507.2004.00261.x
Schildkamp, K., Visscher, A. J., & Luyten, H. (2009). The effects of the use of a school self-evaluation instrument. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802605506
Thoits, P. A. (2011). Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 52, 145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510395592
Tulving, E. (1987). Multiple memory systems and consciousness. Human Neurobiology, 6(2), 67–80.
Valiente, C., Lemery-Chalfant, K., Swanson, J., & Reiser, M. (2008). Prediction of Children’s academic competence from their effortful control, relationships, and classroom participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.67
Van Ryzin, M. J., Gravely, A. A., & Roseth, C. J. (2009). Autonomy, belongingness, and engagement in school as contributors to adolescent psychological well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(1), 1–12.
Van Maele, D., & Van Houtte, M. (2011). The quality of school life: Teacher-student trust relationships and the organizational school context. Social Indicators Research, 100(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9605-8
Virtaten, T., Moreira, P. A. S., Andersson, H., Ulvseth, H., Tetler, S., & Kuorelahti, M. (2017). Analyzing measurement invariance of the students’ engagement inventory brief version: The cases of Denmark, Finland and Portugal. Canadian Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573517699333
Wang, M.-T., Brinkworth, M. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). The moderation effect of teacherestudent relationship on the association between adolescents’ selfregulation ability, family conflict, and developmental problems. Developmental Psychology, 49, 690–705. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027916
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83(3), 877–895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x
Waters, S., Cross, D., & Shaw, T. (2010a). Does the nature of schools matter? An exploration of selected school ecology factors on adolescent perceptions of school connectedness. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 381–402. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X484479
Waters, S. K., Cross, D., & Shaw, T. (2010b). How important are school and interpersonal student characteristics in determining later adolescent school connectedness, by school sector? Australian Journal of Education, 54(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411005400207
Woolley, M. E., Kol, K. L., & Bowen, G. L. (2009). The social context of school success for latino middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431608324478
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Chipuer, H. M., Hanisch, M., Creed, P. A., & McGregor, L. (2006). Relationships at school and stage-environment fit as resources for adolescent engagement and achievement. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 911–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.008
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moreira, P.A.S., Cunha, D., Inman, R., Oliveira, J. (2019). Integrating Healthy Personality Development and Educational Practices: The Case of Student Engagement with School. In: Garcia, D., Archer, T., Kostrzewa, R.M. (eds) Personality and Brain Disorders. Contemporary Clinical Neuroscience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90065-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90065-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90064-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90065-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)