Skip to main content

Forecasting Business Cycles in South Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Cycles in BRICS

Part of the book series: Societies and Political Orders in Transition ((SOCPOT))

Abstract

Characterising the SA business cycle, it is fair to conclude that it has been shaped by both discrete structural change (and exogenous shocks) and its inherent regularity (i.e. endogenous cyclical forces). Being a small and open economy, the SA business cycle is sensitive to global influences, via both the trade and financial channels. Often non-economic factors gave rise to the so-called ‘stop-go’ business cycles of the 1970s and 1980s (and first half of the 1990s). However, through all these tumultuous times a certain export and fixed investment-centred business cycle momentum persisted, exerting itself more fully during the 1990s in response to the political change and macro-economic policy improvements. Unfortunately, SA’s longest post-war business cycle expansion was aborted due to the impact of the Great Recession in 2009 and its aftermath. This latter-mentioned period of unconventional monetary policies in the major advanced economies has witnessed heightened financial volatility and poor domestic real economic growth around a 2% tempo (2012–2014). Suffice to note that the two post-apartheid recessions (1997–1999 and 2009) have been relatively mild affairs and the two expansion phases (1999–2007 and 2009–2013) exceptionally long in a historical context.

While the discrete structural changes and exogenous shocks render economic forecasting hazardous, this does not imply the endogenous regularity of the business cycle has been suspended. Economic forecasters have little option, but to continue applying their trade. Pondering the future of economic forecasting, econometric models provide the best long-run hope for successful forecasting; however, suitable methods need to be developed in order to improve models’ robustness to unanticipated structural breaks. The indicator approach to economic forecasting provides fertile ground in compensating for this weakness. While the economic forecaster needs to tread carefully beyond a forecast horizon of more than 1 year, sound interaction between science and evidence in the forecasting process, good judgement combined with sound econometric modelling, teamwork and the contemplation of alternative scenarios are all elements of value addition in economic forecasting. Provided these elements, the demand for economic forecasting services is likely to continue to grow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A third school can be identified, namely, the structuralist—or institutionalist—school, who believes business cycles are random events dictated by structural and institutional change (see Mohr 2015: 412).

  2. 2.

    This is mirrored in the fact that during 1993–1995 minerals contributed 17.5% of merchandise exports, increasing to 26.9% during 2011–2013 (McCarthy 2015: 9).

  3. 3.

    Since 1970, the South African Reserve Bank regularly determines the upper and lower turning points of the domestic business cycle using extensive statistical and econometric techniques (see Venter 2018).

  4. 4.

    This is the average duration of 14 post-WWII economic expansion phases up to the end of 1996, i.e. excluding the 1999–2007 and 2009 to date expansion phases.

  5. 5.

    In a US survey of forecasting methods applied by forecasters conducted in the early 1980s, the American Statistical Association (ASA), working in conjunction with the National Bureau for Economic Research (NBER), found that an informal GNP model served as the most popular technique (74% of the respondents using this method, with 56% rating it as the most useful); second in line was econometric models (53% and 13%, respectively); third was leading indicators (49% and 12%) and fourth, anticipation surveys (42% and 1%)—see Zarnowitz (1992: 402). This usage pattern may have changed as computing technology developed over the years. In a 1987 survey by the National Association of Business Economists (NABE), it was found that on average the contribution of econometric models to the forecasting outcome was 60%, judgement around 30% and time series methods, current data analysis and interaction with others around 15% (Zarnowitz 1992: 405).

  6. 6.

    Koopmans’ critique (1947) had its origins in the ideas of the celebrated philosopher, Sir Karl Popper, who published his The Logic of Scientific Discovery in 1934. He stated that science can only advance through apriori theories capable of being rejected through empirical testing. Whereas theories had to be falsifiable, Achuthan and Banerji point out that the Burns and Mitchell approach to understanding economic turning points relied on descriptive observations that were not ‘falsifiable’ like mathematical equations (2004: 25–26) and hence Koopmans’ and others’ (notably Paul Samuelson’s) critique of the ‘indicator approach’.

  7. 7.

    Achuthan and Banerji currently lead the Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) in the USA having continued the work of Geoffrey Moore, originally employed by the NBER, but leaving that institute when it became clear that it moved away from its dedicated business cycle research origins in the 1970s. Moore is well-known for the development of composite leading, coinciding and lagging business cycle indicators for the USA and many other countries. Even the American scientific community acknowledged his work during the 1970s (see Achuthan and Banerji 2004: 33).

  8. 8.

    For a comprehensive treatment of this topic, i.e. surveys on forecasting methods and accuracy in the 1970s and 1980s, see Zarnowitz (1992: 389–413). These findings tend to agree with the results of a global survey of model usage conducted recently by the Swedish National Institute of Economic Research (NIER) (Hjelm et al. 2015). Institutions adopt different models and methods depending on their respective needs, and it is difficult to conclude that one particular method/model is superior all the time.

  9. 9.

    The IMF is developing a global modelling structure, called the Flexible System of Global Models (FSGM). The model consists of three core modules, each containing 24 blocks for countries and regions. Household consumption and business fixed investment decisions are modelled from micro-economic foundations similar to that in DSGE modelling, but elements such as trade, labour supply and inflation have reduced form representations. The IMF describes each FSGM module as ‘an annual, multi-region, general equilibrium model of the global economy combining both micro-founded and reduced-form formulations of various economic sectors’ (Andrle et al. 2015: 5).

  10. 10.

    Prof CGW Schumann, who helped in establishing the BER, published a remarkable book in 1938 on business cycles in South Africa over the period 1806–1936, titled: Structural Changes and Business Cycles in South Africa, 1806–1936.

  11. 11.

    These developments occurred at a time when econometric modelling and a so-called scientific approach to economics came into vogue. For instance, at more or less the same time, Achuthan and Banerji describe in their book (2004: 32–34) how the US National Bureau for Economic Research (NBER) ‘veered off its sixty-year path of dedicated business cycle research’ labelled by some as ‘measurement without theory’ by shifting the institutes’ focus to a more ‘scientific’ approach. The roots of this shift lie further back (end of the WWII), with the attack by the mainstream economics community on dedicated business cycle research as being ‘unscientific’.

  12. 12.

    The application of cointegration techniques was initially done using a two-step Engle-Granger method, but later refined by Linette Ellis and Ben Smit (after the publication of the Bank of England’s Macro-econometric Model in 1999) using one-step, or so-called autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) cointegration techniques.

References

  • Achuthan L, Banerji A (2004) Beating the business cycle: how to predict and profit from turning points in the economy. Currency Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrle M, Blagrave P, Espaillat P, Honjo K, Hunt B, Kortelainen M, Lalonde R, Laxton D, Mavroeidi E, Muir D, Marsula S, Snudden S (2015) The flexible system of global models – FSGM. IMF working paper, WP/15/64, March 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Banbura M, Giannone D, Modugno M, Reichlin L (2013) Now-casting and the real-time data flow. ECB working paper series no. 1564

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr G, Kantor B (2002) The South African economy and its asset markets – an integrated approach. University of Cape Town, Rondebosch

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu S, Taylor AM (1999) Business cycles in international historical perspective. J Econ Perspect 13(2):45–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisseker C (2013) The fine art of forecasting. Financial Mail, 17 May

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau for Economic Research (BER) (2015a) Personal interview with Ben Smit (Director), 9 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Bureau for Economic Research (BER) (2015b) Personal interview with Christelle Grobler (Senior Economist), 18 June

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns AF, Mitchell WC (1946) Measuring business cycles. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvo G, Arias EF, Reinhart C, Talvi E (2001) The growth-interest-rate cycle in the United States and its consequences for emerging markets. In: Paper delivered at the annual meetings of the board of governors, Inter-American Development Bank and Inter-American Investment Corporation, Santiago de Chile, 18 Mar 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Mancini-Griffoli T, Sahay R (2014) Spillovers form United States monetary policy on emerging markets: different this time? IMF Working Paper, WP/14/240

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements MP, Hendry DF (2002) A companion to economic forecasting. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries AJM (1994) The South African economy, 1944–1994, Memorial volume of the bureau for economic research. US Printers, Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wet G, Dreyer J (1978) A quarterly econometric model of the South African economy (and a simulation exercise on the price effect of the 1975 devaluation). J Stud Econ Econ 2:19–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis S (2004) Reconsidering the business cycle and stabilization policies in South Africa. Stellenbosch economic working paper no 10, Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis SA (2006) Business cycles in emerging market economies: a new view of the stylised facts. Stellenbosch working papers 2/2006. Bureau for Economic Research and Department of Economics, University of Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis S, Smit BW (2002) Stretching the South-African business cycle. Paper delivered at the 7th annual conference on econometric modelling for Africa, Kruger National Park, July 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis S, Smit BW (2005) Economic growth in South Africa since 1994. Paper delivered at the conference, economic policy under democracy: a ten year review, Stellenbosch, 28–29 October

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukač M, Pagan A (2009) Structural macro-econometric modelling in a policy environment, Reserve Bank of New Zealand discussion paper DP2009/16

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobler C, Smit BW (2013a) The BER annual macro-econometric model of the South African economy. Bureau for Economic Research, unpublished paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobler C, Smit BW (2013b) The BER’s annual macroeconometric model: a non-technical description and a practical application illustrating the impact of a sudden halving of foreign capital flows. BER research note 13/No 1, University of Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjelm G, Bornevall H, Fromlet P, Nillson J, Stockhammer P, Wiberg M (2015) Appropriate macroeconomic model support for the Ministry of Finance and the National Institute of Economic Research: a pilot study. National Institute of Economic Research, Mar 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2002) Recessions and recoveries. Chapter 3 in World economic outlook April 2002, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2009) How linkages fuel the fire: the transmission of financial stress from advanced to emerging economies. Chapter 4 in world economic outlook April 2009, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1947) Measurement without theory. Rev Econ Stat 29(3):161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubscher, P (1992): The BER’s quarterly forecasts: an analysis of its accuracy, 1982–1991, Stud Econ Econ 16(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubscher, P (2004): The SA business cycle over the 1990s and current prospects. Stud Econ Econ 28(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubscher P (2014) A new recession-dating algorithm for South Africa. Stellenbosch economic working papers 06/14, June 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Laubscher P (2015) A brief history of the US interest rate cycle and international capital flows to SA: any guide to the short to medium-term future? BER research note 15/No 1, University of Stellenbosch, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Matheson T (2011) New indicators for tracking growth in real time. IMF working paper no. 11/43

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy CL (2015) South African trade policy: what can it achieve given supply-side stumbling blocks. Tralac, Stellenbosch

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr PJ (2015) Economics for South African students. Van Schaik Publishers, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr P, Rogers C (1994) Macro economics, 3rd edn. Lexicon Publishers, Isando

    Google Scholar 

  • Moolman E (2003) Predicting turning points in the South African economy. S Afr J Econ Manag Sci 6(2):289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer C (1999) Changes in business cycles: evidence and explanations. J Econ Perspect 13(2):23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SA Reserve Bank (2015) Quarterly bulletin. http://www.resbank.co.za, Mar 2015

  • Schumann CGW (1938) Structural changes and business cycles in South Africa, 1806–1936. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostak E (1978) The monetary block of the Standard Bank econometric model: an application of the portfolio approach to monetary analysis in South Africa. J Stud Econ Econ 4:20–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit BW (2006) The South African current account in the context of SA macro-economic policy challenges. Paper delivered at the SA Reserve Bank conference on macro-economic policy challenges for South Africa, Pretoria, 22–24 Oct

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit BW, Pellissier GM (1997) The BER annual econometric model of the South African economy: a cointegration approach. J Stud Econ Econ 21(1):1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Smit BW, Ellis LL, Laubscher P (2003) The macro-economic impact of HIV/Aids in South Africa. Stud Econ Econ 27(2):1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Strydom PDF (2017) Personal interview, 21 May

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Wath N (2013) Comparing the BER’s forecasts. Stellenbosch economic working papers, 23/13, Nov 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Walbeeck C, Sessions M (2007) A directional analysis of the Bureau for economic research’s quarterly forecasts. J Stud Econ Econ 31(3):119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Venter JC (2018) A brief history of business cycle measurement in South Africa. In: Smirnov S, Ozyildirim A, Picchetti P (eds) Business cycles in BRICS. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarnowitz V (1992) Business cycles: theory, history, indicators, and forecasting. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Laubscher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Laubscher, P. (2019). Forecasting Business Cycles in South Africa. In: Smirnov, S., Ozyildirim, A., Picchetti, P. (eds) Business Cycles in BRICS. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90017-9_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics