Abstract
Available composite cyclical indicators for Russia are surveyed, and their components are enumerated and analyzed. The aims, guiding concepts, and approaches of the newly established Russian Economic Cycle Dating Committee are also described. All the currently available monthly composite leading indices (CLIs) are tested against the most recent cyclical turning points for their capacity to provide a timely alarm signal, especially about an impending recession. It is shown that experts’ informal judgments about Russia’s future economic trajectory remain more informative than findings derived from formal empirical rules. This suggests that there is some room for improvement of the Russian CLIs, and additional efforts should be made to construct better cyclical indicators for Russia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
Several indicators based exclusively on surveys of enterprises (e.g., Purchasing Managers’ Indices by IHS Markit) as well as some “exotic” cyclical Russian indices are not considered here; see Smirnov (2014) for a survey of these. Russian cyclical indices calculated by Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI) were omitted from this analysis as no public information on their methodology and components is available. Confidence indicators based on the HSE-Rosstat BTS are described in Lipkind et al. (2018) and the composite index of Regional Economic Activity (REA) in Smirnov and Kondrashov (2018).
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
It was not always the case. In the end of the 1980s to the beginning of the 1990s, many criticized the NBER’s choices. For examples, see McNees (1987); Diebold and Rudebusch (1992); Boldin (1994); Romer (1994). Later, the number of skeptics became less but not equal to zero (see Berge and Jordà 2011; Stock and Watson 2014).
- 8.
Official press release of the RDC is not published yet.
- 9.
As time series by Frenkel et al. (2012) are never published, there is no corresponding chart.
- 10.
See Smirnov (2011) for a survey of such decision rules and their properties. It might appear from the results below that the “five-sixths” rule is too rigid. We tested several other decision rules, and the results were generally the same (they are available upon request).
- 11.
To take into account the specifics of the EEC’s index, we considered zero change as growth. For all other indices, this does not matter. We also considered (1 – CLI) instead of CLI for the CMASF index: for better comparisons with other indices, we converted their estimate of probability of recession into probability of expansion. Values of Frenkel’s index are not published, and so no decision rule can be applied to them.
References
Berge TJ, Jordà Ò (2011) Evaluating the classification of economic activity into recessions and expansions. Am Econ J Macroecon 3(2):246–277
Boldin MD (1994) Dating turning points in the business cycle. J Bus 67(1):97–131
CMASF – Center for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-Term Forecasting (2013) A system of composite leading indicators for system financial and macroeconomic risks: sources and data descriptions (ЦМАКП – Центр макроэкономического анализа и краткосрочного прогнозирования (2013) Источники и описание данных системы сводных опережающих индикаторов системных финансовых и макроэкономических рисков). http://www.forecast.ru/SOI/Metodologja/SOI_Sources.pdf
Davydov A, Popov V, Frenkel A (1993) An index of economic activity: construction and results. World Econ Intl Rel 12:29–41 (Давыдов А, Попов В, Френкель А (1993) Индекс хозяйственной конъюнктуры в России: построение и результаты. Мировая экономика и международные отношения 12:29–41)
Diebold FX, Rudebusch GD (1992) Have postwar economic fluctuations been stabilized? Am Econ Rev 82(4):993–1005
EEC – Eurasian Economic Commission (2014) Methodological approaches to construction of leading economic indicators for state-members of the Customs Union and Single Economic Space (ЕЭК –Евразийская экономическая комиссия (2014) Методологические подходы к построению опережающих индикаторов социально-экономического развития государств – членов ТС и ЕЭП). http://www.eurasiancommission.org/ru/act/integr_i_makroec/dep_makroec_pol/investigations/Documents/LEI_meths.pdf
Frenkel A, Raiskaya N, Matveeva O, Sergienko Ya (2012) Indicator of the economy. Econ Strateg 9:2–9 (Матвеева О, Райская Н, Сергиенко Я, Френкель А (2012) Индикатор экономики. Экономические стратегии 9:2–9)
Lipkind T, Kitrar L, Ostapkovich G (2018) Russian BTSs by HSE and Rosstat. In: Business cycles in BRICS. Springer, Cham
McNees SK (1987) Forecasting cyclical turning points: the record in the past three recessions. N Engl Econ Rev 2:31–40
OECD (2006) Composite leading indicators for major OECD non-member countries: Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Russian Federation, South Africa and recently new OECD member countries: Korea, New Zealand, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovak Republic. OECD, Statistics Directorate, Short-term Economic Statistics Division. March 2006 http://www.oecd.org/std/leading-indicators/36414874.pdf
OECD (2010) OECD composite indicators – 5 February 2010. http://www.oecd.org/fr/std/indicateurs-avances/44556466.pdf
Pestova A (2013) Predicting turning points of the business cycle: do financial sector variables help?. Voprosy Ekonomiki 7:63–81 (Пестова А (2013) Предсказание поворотных точек бизнес-цикла: помогают ли переменные финансового сектора?. Вопросы экономики 7:63–81)
Picchetti P (2018) Brazilian business cycles as characterized by CODACE. In: Business cycles in BRICS. Springer, Cham
Popov V, Frenkel A (1996) An index of business activity for the russian economy. EKO 10:76–89 (Попов В, Френкель А (1996) Индекс деловой активности для российской экономики. ЭКО 10:76–89)
Romer CD (1994) Remeasuring business cycles. J Econ Hist 54(3):573–609
Smirnov SV (2001) A system of leading indicators for Russia. Voprosy Ekonomiki 3:23–42 (Смирнов СВ (2001) Система опережающих индикаторов для России. Вопросы экономики 3:23–42)
Smirnov SV (2006) A new system of cyclical indicators for Russia. In: 28th CIRET Conference, Rome, September 2006
Smirnov SV (2011) Discerning ‘turning points’ with cyclical indicators: a few lessons from ‘real time’ monitoring the 2008–2009 recession. NRU Higher School of Economics. Working paper WP2/2011/03
Smirnov SV (2014) Russian cyclical indicators and their usefulness in real time: an experience of the 2008–09 recession. J Bus Cycle Meas Anal 1:103–128
Smirnov SV, Kondrashov NV (2018) Indices of regional economic activity for Russia. In: Business cycles in BRICS. Springer, Cham
Smirnov SV, Kondrashov NV, Petronevich AV (2017) Dating cyclical turning points for Russia: formal methods and informal choices. J Bus Cycle Res 13(1):53–73
Stock JH, Watson MW (2014) Estimating turning points using large data sets. J Econ 178(Part 2):368–381
Venter JC (2018) The SARB’s composite business cycle indicators. In: Business cycles in BRICS. Springer, Cham
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1: Memorandum of the Russian Economic Cycle Dating Committee
1.1 Russian Economic Cycle Dating Committee (Russian Dating Committee, RDC) Under the Association of Russian Economic Think Tanks (ARETT): Key Concepts and Approaches
-
1.
The Russian Economic Cycle Dating Committee (Russian Dating Committee, RDC) under the Association of Russian Economic Think Tanks (ARETT) uses the following concepts in its work:
-
Cycle of economic activity (business cycle): Fluctuations in Russian economic activity that continue through several quarters for 10–12 years or more. A full cycle in this sense comprises two phases: growth and contraction (recession), which do not adhere to strict pattern of periodicity.
-
Phases of growth and contraction (recession): Alternating periods of overall increase and decrease in economic activity. During the growth phase, production and sales volumes of goods and services in the entire economy, and in most sectors, grow; in the contraction (recession) phase, they fall.
-
Turning point: A moment in time immediately preceding the transition of the economy from one phase to the other.
-
Peak: A moment when economic activity is at its maximum, followed by the economy’s transition from a growth phase to recession.
-
Trough (or bottom): A moment when economic activity is at its minimum, followed by the economy’s transition from recession to growth.
-
-
2.
The RDC’s goal is to date turning points in Russian cycles of economic activity (business cycles) to appropriate months.
-
3.
The RDC does not see it as its goal to date turning points of growth cycles (deviations from the long-term trend) or growth rate cycles, nor does the RDC develop or test theories that seek to explain the existence of economic cycles or identify drivers of any particular cycle or cyclical phase. Any member of the RDC may, as an individual, study these issues, but their opinion on such matters should be considered as their own personal view.
-
4.
When offering real-time comments on the state of the Russian economy, members of the RDC may define the Russian economy as reaching or not reaching a recent turning point (peak or trough). The RDC will formulate a consolidated position of its members over time, taking as much time as is needed to conclusively analyze the situation.
-
5.
Every RDC member uses those indicators and methods in their analysis that they feel are most useful. RDC members form a consolidated position through open and grounded discussion of the results put forward, taking into account not only the results of statistical tests but also members’ qualitative analyses.
-
6.
Although the RDC’s decisions always relate to the past, rather than the current state of the economy, it would be erroneous to assume that they are “delayed.” The RDC seeks to date turning points as soon as it becomes clear that the coming change in economic activity will not be a continuation of the preceding phase but will constitute a new phase of the cycle; besides, statistical data that appears should enable these turning points to be discerned with reasonable accuracy. As a rule, this takes 9–18 months, from the month of the turning point.
-
7.
If the subsequent revision of Rosstat data radically changes the perception of the course of the Russian economic cycle, then the RDC may update the turning point dating.
-
8.
If there are two or more months that offer almost similar grounds to be considered turning points, the RDC prefers to choose the later one.
-
9.
Results of and grounds for dating are published by the RDC in dedicated press releases on the RDC website.
-
10.
Dating of cyclical turning points established by the RDC can be used for further analysis of historical economic dynamics in Russia, and to predict future dynamics, in particular in developing and calibrating systems of leading, coincident, and lagging indicators.
Appendix 2: Short glossary for the OECD’s news releases
Standard “diagnoses” by the OECD | Short notation |
---|---|
Growth below trend Weak growth momentum Growth losing momentum | < |
Tentative signs of easing growth Growth tentatively losing momentum Signs of easing growth Signs of slowing growth momentum | ≤ |
Stable growth momentum Growth around trend | = |
Tentative signs of positive change in growth momentum Signs of positive change in growth momentum Stabilization of growth momentum | ≥ |
Growth gaining momentum Growth picking up Stable growth momentum | > |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smirnov, S.V. (2019). A Survey of Composite Leading Indices for Russia. In: Smirnov, S., Ozyildirim, A., Picchetti, P. (eds) Business Cycles in BRICS. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90017-9_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90017-9_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90016-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90017-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)