Abstract
This essay makes the case for the value of the idea of the aristocratic as a term for contemporary criticism, focusing on the distinctions between aristocracy and democracy drawn by Alexis de Tocqueville. The key consequence for intellectual life in the shift from aristocratic to democratic society, in Tocqueville’s view, is the loss of the capacity of one individual to influence another. While democracy improves the material conditions of life and reduces suffering and poverty, the idea of equality nevertheless endangers the highest capacities of human beings. It is aristocracy, not democracy, that exalts the intellect and encourages freedom of thought, which democratic society tends to subordinate to the psychic well-being of the majority. The inequality of aristocratic society gives rise to the expectation that those who are intellectually superior should influence others, even if the former were not born into the ruling caste. The fact that superiority, and not equality, is the defining value means that people are more easily able to accept the insights of others, because they are not preoccupied by the mental labor of defending challenges to their self-esteem. The essay takes up the question of what an aristocratic approach to criticism would look like, and how it might provide a way out of the impasses into which the discipline of literary studies has fallen.
The art of being a slave is to rule one’s master.
Diogenes
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (NRF-2010-361-A00018).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsWorks Cited
Arendt, Hannah. Between Past and Future. New York: Penguin, 1996.
Felski, Rita. Uses of Literature. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008.
———. The Limits of Critique. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
Gardner, Stephen L. “Democracy’s Debt: Capitalism and Cultural Revolution.” In Debt: Ethics, the Environment, and the Economy. Eds. Peter Y. Paik and Merry Wiesner-Hanks. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.
Goux, Jean-Joseph. Oedipus, Philosopher. Trans. Catherine Porter. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1993.
Lefort, Claude. Writing: The Political Test. Trans. David Ames Curtis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.
Manent, Pierre. Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy. Trans. John Waggoner. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.
———. “Tocqueville, Political Philosopher.” In The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville. Ed. Cheryl B. Welch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Daybreak. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
———. Untimely Meditations. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
North, Joseph. Literary Criticism: A Concise Political History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
Ortega y Gasset, José. The Revolt of the Masses. New York: W. W. Norton, 1993.
Pascal, Blaise. Pensées. Trans. W. F. Trotter. New York: E. P. Dutton, 1958.
Rieff, Philip. My Life Among the Deathworks: Illustrations of the Aesthetics of Authority. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, 2006.
Santayana, George. Soliloquies in England and Later Soliloquies. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1922.
Scheler, Max. Ressentiment. Trans. William W. Holdheim. New York: Schocken, 1972.
Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America and Two Essays on America. Trans. Gerald E. Bevan. New York: Penguin, 2003.
———. De la démocratie en Amérique, Volumes 3/4. 21 November 2009. www.gutenberg.org/files/30515/30515-h/30515-h.htm.
Wolin, Sheldon. Tocqueville Between Two Worlds: The Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paik, P.Y. (2018). Reading Aristocratically. In: Pireddu, N. (eds) Reframing Critical, Literary, and Cultural Theories. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89990-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89990-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89989-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89990-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)