Skip to main content

Changing Perceptions of Archaeological Human Remains in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Archaeological Human Remains
  • 443 Accesses

Abstract

Until the end of the First World War, the investigation of archaeological human remains in Germany followed a typological concept that was dominated by attempts to categorize the morphological variability of human skeletons. Until the end of the Second World War, this approach grew more acute because of the pressure imposed by the National Socialists to conform with politically desired “human races.” After Germany’s division into the FRG and GDR, the scientific landscapes in the two parts of Germany again reflected the different political systems although physical anthropologists remained strongly connected with archaeological sciences in both polities. By the end of the twentieth century, new concepts and methods and explicitly contextual research on human remains slowly gained in importance what is reflected by, e.g., the growing relevance of biomolecular research after the German unification. As a result, however, traditional skeletal biology has turned into a small and endangered academic subject.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Interestingly, human cremations – today a rather neglected find category compared to uncremated archaeological skeletons – were recognized as empirical historical source even earlier by the British philosopher and poet Sir Thomas Browne (Browne 1658).

  2. 2.

    In Germany, Ernst Haeckel (1834–1919) was the most vehement and successful advocate of the inclusion of the genesis of mankind into the theory of evolution. Although his work was most influential on human phylogeny, his contribution to physical anthropology has only recently been emphasized by Hoßfeld (2016: 147 ff).

  3. 3.

    “Emperor-Wilhelm-Institute for Anthropology, Human Genetics and Eugenics” – the Kaiser-Wilhelm scientific society was the precursor of today’s Max-Planck Society.

  4. 4.

    Today, areas where former Jewish burial sites are assumed are sacrosanct in respect of building measures and archaeological/anthropological investigation.

References

  • Anthropologisches Forum. 2015. “Qua vadis Anthropologie? Leistungen und Perspektiven der deutschen Anthropologie in Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft”. Mitteilungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthropologie. Ethnologie und Urgeschichte 36: 149–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berwanger, K., B. Hoffmann, J. Stein, and N.P. Franz. 2012. Abschlussbericht des Projekts Kartierung der sog. Kleinen Fächer mit den Statements der Internationalen Tagung Kleine Fächer in Deutschland, Europa und in den USA vom 2. Dezember 2011. Potsdam: Universität Potsdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blänkle, P.H. 1984. Die Sprache der Toten. Was Skelettfunde verraten/Neue Methoden der Frühgeschichte. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10. August 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenbach, J.F. 1775. De generis humani varietate nativa. Dissertation Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, T. 1658. Hydriotaphia, Urn Burial, or, a Discourse of the Sepulchral Urns lately found in Norfolk. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 1992. European convention on the protection of the Archaeological Heritage. European Treaty Series 143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Museumsbund (DMB). 2013. Empfehlungen zum Umgang mit menschlichen Überresten in Museen und Sammlungen. Published online at www.museumsbund.de/de/publikationen/online_publikationen.

  • Ferembach, D., I. Schwidetzky, and M. Stloukal. 1979. Empfehlungen für die Alters- und Geschlechtsdiagnose am Skelett. Homo 30: 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, E. 1961. Die Rehobother Bastards und das Bastardisierungsproblem beim Menschen. Anthropologische und ethnographische Studien am Rehobother Bastardvolk in Deutsch-Südwest-Afrika. Graz: Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goschler, C. 2002. Rudolf Virchow. Mediziner – Anthropologe – Politiker. Köln: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greil, H., and G. Grupe. 2013. Geschichte der Gesellschaft für Anthropologie e.V. (GfA, gegründet am 12. September 1992). Documenta Archaeobiologiae 11: 25–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupe, G., J. Peters, E. Stephan, and J. Wahl. 2004. Curatorial responsibility for bioarchaeological collections. Documenta Archaeobiologiae 2: 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupe, G., M. Harbeck, and G.C. McGlynn 2015a. Prähistorische Anthropologie. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Grupe, M. Grünewald, M. Gschwind, S. Hölzl, B. Kocsis, P. Kröger, A. Lang, M. Mauder, C. Mayr, G.C. McGlynn, C. Metzner-Nebelsick, E. Ntoutsi, J. Peters, M. Renz, S. Reuß, W.W. Schmahl, F. Söllner, C.S. Sommer, B. Steidl, A Toncala., S Trixl, and D. Wycisk 2015b. Networking in bioarchaeology: The example of the DFG Research Group FOR 1670 “transalpine mobility and culture transfer”. Documenta Archaeobiologiae 12: 13–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagelberg, E., B. Sykes, and R. Hedges. 1989. Ancient bone DNA amplified. Nature 342: 485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heberer, G. 1943. Rassengeschichtliche Forschungen im indogermanischen Urheimatgebiet. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoßfeld, U. 2016. Geschichte der biologischen Anthropologie in Deutschland. Von den Anfängen bis in die Nachkriegszeit. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junius, H., and J. Wahl. 2014. Der “Planoccipitale Steilkopf” – ein forschungsgeschichtliches Rudiment im Rahmen des Glockenbecherphänomens. Fundberichte aus Baden-Württemberg 34: 529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lösch, N.C. 1997a. Rasse als Konstrukt. Leben und Werk Eugen Fischers. Frankfurt/Main: Ang.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997b. Die “Erbgesundheit” Heinrichs des Löwen. Braunschweiger Jahrbuch 78: 227–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. 1914. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in systematischer Darstellung. 1. Auflage. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., and K. Saller. 1957. Lehrbuch der Anthropologie in systematischer Darstellung mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der anthropologischen Methoden. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittelkow, J., and U. Hoßfeld. 2015. Auf zu neuen Ufern? Herbert Bach und die Verbindung von Anthropologie und Humangenetik in der DDR. Documenta Archaeobiologiae 12: 196–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuß, D. 2007. et in pulverem reverteris? Vom ethisch verantworteten Umgang mit menschlichen Überresten in Sammlungen sowie musealen und sakralen Räumen. Herbert Utz: München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranke, J. 1887. Der Mensch. Band 2. Die heutigen und vorgeschichtlichen Menschenrassen. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, T. 1974. Die Grablege Heinrichs des Löwen im Dom zu Braunschweig. Braunschweiger Jahrbuch 55: 9–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwidetzky, I. 1984. Data banks and multivariate statistics in physical anthropology. In Multivariate statistical methods in physical anthropology, ed. G.N. Van Vark and W.W. Howells, 283–288. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, C.S., and T. Weski. 2004. “Wow, he still has his teeth!” – Man in the archaeological sciences. Documenta Archaeobiologiae 2: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel-Rösing, I., and I. Schwidetzky. 1982. Maus und Schlange. Untersuchungen zur Lage der deutschen Anthropologie. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoecker, H., Schnalke, T. and Winkelmann, A. (eds). 2013. Sammeln, Erforschen, Zurückgeben? Menschliche Gebeine aus der Kolonialzeit in akademischen und musealen Sammlungen. Berlin: Christoph Links.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschler-Nicola, M., and G. Grupe. 2012. Paleopathology in Germanic countries. In The global history of paleopathology. Pioneers and prospects, ed. J.E. Buikstra and C.A. Roberts, 387–404. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, C. 1983. Biologische Perspektiven der Anthropologie: Gedanken zum sog. Theorie-Defizit der biologischen Anthropologie in Deutschland. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie 73: 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Baer, K.E., and R. Wagner. 1861. Bericht über die Zusammenkunft einiger Anthropologen im september 1861 in Göttingen zum Zwecke gemeinsamer Besprechungen. Leipzig: Voss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, J. 1999. Alfred Schliz, der Typologe. Zur Anthropologie um die Jahrhundertwende. In Schliz – ein Schliemann im Unterland? 100 Jahre Archäologie im Heilbronner Raum, ed. C. Jacob and H. Spatz, 78–97. Museo 14. Heilbronn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegelmayer, G. 2003. Ranke, Johannes. Neue Deutsche Biographie 21: 142–144.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are most indebted to the editors of this volume for the invitation to write this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gisela Grupe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grupe, G., Wahl, J. (2018). Changing Perceptions of Archaeological Human Remains in Germany. In: O'Donnabhain, B., Lozada, M. (eds) Archaeological Human Remains. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89984-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89984-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89983-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89984-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics