Abstract
This work presents a summary of the results obtained during the activities developed within the GARTEUR AD/AG-52 group. GARTEUR stands for “Group for Aeronautical Research and Technology in Europe” and is a multinational organization that performs high quality, collaborative, precompetitive research in the field of aeronautics to improve technological competence of the European Aerospace Industry. The aim of the AG52 group was to make an evaluation and assessment of surrogate-based global optimization methods for aerodynamic shape design of aeronautical configurations. The structure of the paper is as follows: Sect. “Introduction” will introduce the state-of-the-art in surrogate-based optimization for aerodynamic design and Sect. “Definition of Common Test Cases and Methods” will detail the test cases selected in the AG52 group. Optimization results will be then showed in Sect. “Optimization Results”, and conclusions will be provided in the last section.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed M, Qin N (2010) Metamodels for aerothermodynamic design optimization. In: 48th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting. AIAA 2010-1318
AIAA 3rd drag prediction workshop. URL: http://aaac.larc.nasa.gov/tsab/cfdlarc/aiaa-dpw/Workshop3/workshop3.html, [Online]
Andres E, Monge F (INTA), Perez A, Salcedo S (UAH) (2011) Metamodel assisted aerodynamic design using evolutionary optimization. EUROGEN
Asouti VG, Giannakoglou KC (Technical University of Athens, Greece) (2009) A grid-27 asynchronous metamodel-assisted evolutionary algorithm for aerodynamic optimization. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
Bompard B, Peter J (ONERA, France), Desideri J (INRIA, France) (2010) Surrogate models based on function and derivative values for aerodynamic global optimization. ECOMAS CFD
Branke J, Schmidt C (2005) Faster convergence by means of fitness estimation. Soft Comput Fusion Found Methodologies Appl 9(1):13–20
Buche D, Schraudolph N, Koumoutsakos P (2005) Accelerating evolutionary algorithms with Gaussian process fitness function models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part C Appl Rev 35:183–194
Carrier G (2006) Single and multipoint aerodynamic optimizations of a supersonic transport aircraft wing using optimization strategies involving adjoint method and genetic algorithm. In: ERCOFTAC conference on optimization
Cheng CS, Chen PW, Huang KK (2011) Estimating the shift size in the process mean with support vector regression and neural networks. Expert Syst Appl 38:10624–10630
Clarke SM, Griebsch JH, Simpson TW (2005) Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. Trans ASME, J Mech Des 127(6):1077–1087
Cook P, Mcdoland M, Firmin M (1979) Aerofoil RAE 2822—pressure distributions, and boundary layer and wake measurements. AGARD Report 138
de Weerdt E, Chu QP, Mulder JA (Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands) (2005) Neural network aerodynamic model identification for aerospace reconfiguration. AIAA
Duvigneau R, Visonneau M (2004) (Ecole Centrale de Nantes, France), Hybrid genetic algorithms and artificial neural networks for complex design optimization in CFD, Int J Numer Methods Fluids 44
Epstein B, Jameson A, Peigin S, Roman D, Harrison N, Vassberg J (2008) Comparative study of 3D wing drag minimization by different optimization techniques. In: 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. AIAA paper 2, Reno, Nevada
Forrester A, Keane A (2009) Recent advances in surrogate-based optimization. Prog Aerosp Sci 45(1–3):50–79
Giannakoglou K (2002) Design of optimal aerodynamic shapes using stochastic optimization methods and computational intelligence. Prog Aerosp Sci 38(1):43–76
Iuliano E, Andrés E (2015) “Application of surrogate-based global optimization to aerodynamic design.” Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering. ISBN 978-3-319-21505-1
Iuliano E, Quagliarella D (2013) “Aerodynamic shape optimization via non-intrusive POD-based surrogate modelling.” In: IEEE congress on evolutionary computation. Cancún, México, June 20–23
Jiang H, He W (2012) Grey relational grade in local support vector regression for financial time series prediction. Expert Syst Appl 39:2256–2262
Jin Y (2005) A comprehensive survey of fitness approximation in evolutionary computation. Soft Comput J 9(1):3–12
Jin Y, Olhofer M, Sendhoff B (2002) A framework for evolutionary optimization with approximate fitness functions. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(5):481–494
Kampolis IC, Giannakoglou KC (2011) Synergetic use of different evaluation, parametrisation and search tools within a hierarchical optimization platform. Appl Soft Comput 11(1):645–651
Kapsoulis D, Tsiakas K, Asouti V, Giannakoglou K (2016) The use of Kernel PCA in evolutionary optimization for computationally demanding engineering applications. In: 2016 IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI). Athens, Greece, pp 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ssci.2016.7850203
Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE international conference on neural networks
Leifsson L, Koziel S, Tesfahunegn Y (2014) “Aerodynamic design optimization: physics-based surrogate approaches for airfoil and wing design”. AIAA SciTech. AIAA 2014-0572
Lim D, Jin Y, Ong YS, Sendho B (2010) Generalizing surrogate-assisted evolutionary computation. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 14(3):329–355
Marinus BG (Royal Military Academy/VKI for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium), Rogery M (Ecole Centrale de Lyon, France), Braembusschez R (VKI for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium) (2010) Aeroacoustic and aerodynamic optimization of aircraft propeller blades. AIAA
Muller SD, Marchetto J, Airaghi S, Koumoutsakos P (2002) Optimization based on bacterial chemotaxis. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(1):16–29
Peter J, Marcelet M (ONERA, France) (2007) Comparison of surrogate models for turbomachinery design. In: 7th wseas international conference on simulation, modelling and optimization
Peter J, Carrier G, Bailly D, Klotz P, Marcelet M, Renac F (March 2011) Local and Global Search Methods for Design in Aeronautics. ONERA J AerospaceLab 2
Praveen C, Duvigneau R (2007) Radial basis functions and kriging metamodels for aerodynamic optimization. INRIA Technical report
Salcedo-Sanz S, Ortiz-Garcia E, Perez-Bellido A, Portilla A (2011) Short term wind speed prediction based on evolutionary support vector regression algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 38:4052–4057
Storn R, Price K (1997) Differential evolution: a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Global Optim 11:341–359
Szollos A, Smid M, Hájek J (2009) Aerodynamic optimization via multi-objective micro-genetic algorithm with range adaptation: knowledge-based reinitialization, crowding and dominance. Adv Eng Software 40
Vankan J, Maas R (2010) Surrogate modeling for efficient design optimization of composite aircraft fuselage panels. In: 27th international congress of the aeronautical sciences, ICAS
Won KS, Ray T (2005) A Framework for Design Optimization using Surrogates. Eng Optim 37(7):685–703
Younis A, Jichao G, Zuomin D, Guangyao L (2008) Trends, features, and test of common and recently introduced global optimization methods. In: 2th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary & optimization conference. AIAA 2008-5853
Zhong-Hua H, Zimmermann R, Görtz S (DLR, Germany) (2010) A new cokriging method for variable-fidelity surrogate modeling of aerodynamic data. AIAA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andrés-Pérez, E. et al. (2019). Garteur AD/AG-52: Surrogate-Based Global Optimization Methods in Preliminary Aerodynamic Design. In: Andrés-Pérez, E., González, L., Periaux, J., Gauger, N., Quagliarella, D., Giannakoglou, K. (eds) Evolutionary and Deterministic Methods for Design Optimization and Control With Applications to Industrial and Societal Problems. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89890-2_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89889-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89890-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)