Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Investigation of Organizational Intelligence Level of Schools According to Teachers’ Opinion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017 (ICCLS 2017)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this study, the organizational intelligence perception of teachers that work in public schools of Altındağ district in Ankara province is investigated. Besides, it is examined that the organizational intelligence perception of teachers may create a significant difference according to various demographic variables. The study is carried out with the participation of 226 teachers in the 2016–2017 academic year. “Multidimensional organizational intelligence scale” has been used as a tool to gather data. Data has been analyzed with descriptive statistics, t-test for independent groups, and one-way analysis of variance. Data analysis has been carried out with SPSS 22.0 and LISREL 8.8 softwares. According to study findings, it is found out that teachers perceived their schools’ organizational intelligence in a high level. Additionally, it is understood that whereas teachers’ perception of organizational intelligence differs significantly according to teachers’ sex and the schools’ socioeconomic condition, it does not differ significantly according to variables like teachers’ year of service and level of education and the school’s number of students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbari, N. (2016). Analyzing the relationship between organizational intelligence and organizational learning among school principals of Pakdasht County. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 8(2S), 651–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akgün, A. E., Lynn, G. S., & Byrne, J. C. (2003). Organizational learning: A socio-cognitive framework. Human Relations, 56, 839–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, K. (2002). Seven traits of the intelligent organization. https://www.karlalbrecht.com/books/chapters/MAW03.pdf. E.T.:02.12.2017.

  • Allensworth, E., Ponisciak, S., & Mazzeo, C. (2009). The schools teachers leave teacher mobility in chicago public schools. Consortium on Chicago school research at the Unıversity of Chicago Urban Education Institute, Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press Announcement Agency. (2017). 130 bin misafirimiz var. http://www.bik.gov.tr/130-bin-misafirimiz-var/. E.T.: 01.12.2017.

  • Borman, G. D., & Dowling, N. M. (2006). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 28, 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çakır, R. (2008). Örgütselzekânıngeliştirilmesineilişkinyapılanbirçalıştayınörgütselzekâdüzeyiningeliştirilmesineetkisi. YayımlanmamışDoktoraTezi. Atatürk Üniversitesi, SosyalBilimlerEnstitüsü, Erzurum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., Vigdor, J. L., & Diaz, R. A. (2004). Do school accountability systems make it more difficult for low performing schools to attract and retain high-quality teachers? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(2), 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courbon, J., & Trahand, J. (1993). Organizational intelligence and enabling Technologies.Proceedings of IEEE Systems Man and Cybernetics Conference, 1, 678–681. 17–20 Oct 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). SosyalBilimlerİçinÇokDeğişkenliİstatistik SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara: PegemAkademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, C. T. (2013). A knowledge management and organizational intelligence model for public administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(11), 807–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directorate General of Migration Management. (2016). 2016 Türkiye göç raporu. http://www.goc.gov.tr/files/files/2016_goc_raporu_.pdf. E.T: 20.11.2017.

  • Domagalski, T. A. (1999). Emotion in organizations: Main currents. Human Relations, 52(6), 833–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekici, Ö. (2007). Resmiveözelilköğretimokullarındaörgütselzekâdüzeylerineilişkinyöneticiveöğretmengörüşleri (Sakaryailiörneği).YayımlanmamışYüksekLisansTezi. SakaryaÜniversitesi, SosyalBilimlerEnstitüsü, Sakarya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekici, Ö. O., & Titrek, O. (2011). İlköğretimokullarındaörgütselzekâdüzeylerineilişkinyöneticiveöğretmengörüşleri. HacettepeÜniversitesiEğitimFakültesiDergisi, 40, 152–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2001). ÖrgütselZekâ. Ankara: Nobel YayınDağıtım.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2004a). Okullardaörgütselzekânıneylemselboyutları. TürkEğitimBilimleriDergisi, 2 (1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2004b). ÖrgütselZekâveÖrgütselAptallık. Ankara: AsilYayınDağıtım.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Çetin, B., & vePotas, N. (2007). Multi-Dimensional organizational intelligence scale (Muldimorins). World Applied Sciences Journal, 2(3), 151–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (Ed.). (2009). Organizational intelligence in question. Booksurge, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, M. A. (1996). Innovative genius: A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1081–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, A. H., Malhotra, A., & Segars, A. H. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E., & Rivkin, S. (2007). Pay, working conditions, and teacher quality. Future of Children, 17, 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karasar, N. (2000). Bilimselaraştırmayöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel YayınDağıtım.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefter, V., Prejmerean, M., & Vasilache, S. (2008). The dimensions of organizational intelligence-a human capital perspective. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 10(527), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leidner, D. E., Carlsson, C., Elam, J., & Corrales, M. (1999). Mexican and Swedish managers’ perceptions of the impact of EIS on organizational intelligence, decision making, and structure. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 633–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, D., & Matheson, J. (1999). Akıllıörgüt. (Çev.,MeralTüzel). İstanbul: Boyner Holding Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S., Hanushek, E., & Kain, J. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (2003). A cybernetic model to enhance organizational intelligence. Systems Analysis Modelling Simulation, 43(1), 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simic, I. (2005). Organizational learning as a component of organizational intelligence. Information and Marketing Aspects of the Economically Development of the Balkan Countries. ISBN 954–90277–8-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stonehouse, G. H., & Pemberton, J. D. (1999). Learning and knowledge management in the intelligent organisation. Participation and Empowerment: An International Journal, 7(5), 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanrıkulu, F. Z. (2014). Ortaöğretimokullarındayöneticiveöğretmenlerinörgütselzekâyailişkinalgıdüzeyleri (Çanakkaleiliörneği).YayımlanmamışYüksekLisansTezi. ÇanakkaleOnsekiz Mart Üniversitesi, EğitimBilimleriEnstitüsü, Çanakkale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thannhuber, M. J., Bruntsch, A., & Tseng, M. M. (2017). Knowledge management: Managing organizational intelligence and knowledge in autopoietic process management systems- ten years into industrial application. Procedia CIRP, 63, 384–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vince, R. (2001). Power and emotion in organizational learning. Human Relations, 54, 1325–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., & Mossholder, K. W. (2004). Decoupling task and relationship conflict: The role of intragroup emotional processing. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım, E. (2010). Örgütsel öğrenmenin öncülü olarak örgütsel zekâ: teori ve bir uygulama. Sosyal Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 20, 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolles, M. (2005). Organisational intelligence. Journal of Workplace Learning, 17(1/2), 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yörük, S. (2006). İlköğretimokullarınınörgütselzekâdüzeyleriniyansıtmadüzeyleri (Elazığiliörneği).YayımlanmamışDoktoraTezi. FıratÜniversitesi, SosyalBilimlerEnstitüsü, Elazığ.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ministry of National Education, Ankara, Turkey

    Gülşah İmamoğlu Akman & Yener Akman

Authors
  1. Gülşah İmamoğlu Akman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yener Akman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. International Science Association, Ankara, Turkey

    Şefika Şule Erçetin

  2. International Science Association, Ankara, Turkey

    Nihan Potas

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Akman, G.İ., Akman, Y. (2019). Investigation of Organizational Intelligence Level of Schools According to Teachers’ Opinion. In: Erçetin, Ş., Potas, N. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017. ICCLS 2017. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89875-9_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89875-9_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89874-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89875-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation