Skip to main content

Complexity Theory as a New Lens in IR: System and Change

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017 (ICCLS 2017)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Discussions over shifting from linearity to nonlinearity in natural sciences have led to unexpected reflections in social sciences. Nonlinear theories have gained a new momentum in our understanding of complex and complicated social events. Similarly, the changing patterns of international relations (IR) encourage us to reconsider the dimensions of international systems and discuss the concept of change and order. This paper seeks to explain the contribution of complexity theory to the understanding of the international system and its change. Firstly, it justifies the need for a new approach in IR theorization in the light of the limits of conventional IR theories as well as of the changing patterns from linearity to nonlinearity. Then, it demonstrates the usefulness of complexity theory’s core assumptions to define the international system, the idea of change and the agent-structure debate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Bölücek, C. A. (2014). Understanding of Arab spring with chaos theory-uprising or revolution. In S. Banerjee, Ş. Ş. Erçetin, & A. Tekin (Eds.), Chaos theory in politics (pp. 29–48). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bosquet, A., & Curtis, S. (2011). Beyond models and metaphors: Complexity theory, systems thinking and international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 24(01), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossomaier, T. R. J., & Green, D. G. (2000). Introduction. In T. R. J. Bossomaier & D. G. Green (Eds.), Complex Systems (p. 413). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., Jones, C., & Little, R. (1993). The logic of anarchy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cindea, I. (2006). Complex systems-new conceptual tools for international relations. Perspectives, 14(1), 46–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, E., & Hobden, S. (2013). Of parts and wholes: International relations beyond the human. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 430–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. New York: A&C Black.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, T. R. (2004). Understanding public policy. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., Potas, N., Kısa, N., & Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2012). To be on the edge of chaos with organizational intelligence and health. In S. Banerjee (Ed.), Chaos and complexity theory for management: Nonlinear dynamics (pp. 182–201). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş, Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Bülbül, M. Ş. (2013). Chap. 5: A multi-dimensional approach to leadership in chaotic environments. In S. Banerjee (Ed.), Chaos and complexity theory for management: nonlinear dynamics (pp. 89–104). Pennsylvania: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkoçak, E., & Açıkalın, Ş. N. (2015). Complexity theory in public administration and metagovernance. In Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2013 (pp. 73–84). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R. (2003). Beyond the third way: The science of complexity and the politics of choice. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 5, 237–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guastello, S. (2002). Managing emergent phenomena. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunitsky, S. (2013). Complexity and theories of change in international politics. International Theory, 5, 35–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, U. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R., & Nye, J. (1989). Power and interdependence (2nd ed.). Glenville: Scott Foresman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E.-H. (2008). Complexity theory and public administration: What’s new? Public Management Review, 10(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802002675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Ten principles of complexity and enabling infrastructures. In E. Mitleton-Kelly (Ed.), Complex systems and evolutionary perspectives on organisations: The application of complexity theory to organisations. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1989). Exploring complexity: An introduction. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, H. L. (2013). Dynamics among Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prigogine, I. (1996). The End of Certainty. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, C. A. (2007). Public policy: Preferences and outcomes. New York: Pearson/Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1994). America's mission: The United States and the worldwide struggle for democracy in the twentieth century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomé, L. (2010). Security and security complex: operational concepts. Janus.net, e-journal of international relations, 1(1.) (Autumn). http://observare.ual.pt/janus.net/en_vol1_n1_art3.

  • Tomé, L. (Ed.). (2015). “Islamic state” – The new global jihadist phenomenon. Porto: Formal Press/Media XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomé, L. (2016). Complex systems theories and eclectic approach in analysing and theorising the contemporary international security complex. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin & H. Bagci (Eds.), Handbook of research on chaos and complexity theory in the social sciences (pp. 19–32). Hershey: IGI Global/Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valle, V. (2000). Chaos, complexity and deterrence: A term project for the National Academy of War. Retrieved from http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ndu/valle.pdf. p. 4.

  • Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tomé, L., Açıkalın, Ş.N. (2019). Complexity Theory as a New Lens in IR: System and Change. In: Erçetin, Ş., Potas, N. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017. ICCLS 2017. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89875-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89875-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89874-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89875-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics