Skip to main content

Investigating the Different Roles of the Factors Affecting Ethically Questionable Consumer Behaviour

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Civil Society: The Engine for Economic and Social Well-Being (GSMAC 2017)

Abstract

Based on an empirical study in the context of Romania, this paper examines the different levels of importance regarding the determinants within the ethically questionable consumer behaviour. The quantitative study is based on the model of the theory of planned behaviour incorporating the factor of perceived unfairness. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess measurement structures and the proposed model was estimated using structural equation modelling. Significantly, perceived behavioural control is shown to have an obvious positive impact on the intention to behave unethically in terms of digital piracy context, but this is not significant in case of shoplifting. Instead, the influence of the perceived unfairness is shown to be considerable when it comes to the consumer action of stealing goods from a shop. As such, the influencing factors of ethically questionable behaviour change their importance depending on the type of the behaviour. In other words, companies need to understand the consumer perceptions toward the difficulty of engaging in ethically questionable behaviour and to consider their responsibilities in relation to their consumers. Limitations of the study and future directions for research are considered as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aleassa, H., Pearson, J. M., & McClurg, S. (2011). Investigating software piracy in Jordan: An extension of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 663–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechwati, N. N., Sisodia, R. S., & Sheth, J. N. (2009). Developing a model of antecedents to consumers’ perceptions and evaluations of price unfairness. Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 761–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BSA The Software Alliance—Seizing Opportunity Through License Compliance (2016). http://globalstudy.bsa.org/2016/downloads/studies/BSA_GSS_US.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2017.

  • Cherrier, H., & Murray, J. B. (2007). Reflexive dispossession and the self: constructing a processual theory of identity. Consumption Markets & Culture, 10(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockrill, A., & Goode, M. M. (2012). DVD pirating intentions: Angels, devils, chancers and receivers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronan, T. P., & Al-Rafee, S. (2008). Factors that influence the intention to pirate software and media. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(4), 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabija, D. C., Postelnicu, C., & Pop, N. Al. (2016). Ethics of the garment retail within the context of globalization and sustainable development. Industria Textila, 67(4), 270–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, V., & Taylor, D. (2010). Shoplifting, unethical consumer behaviour, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 878–883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K. (2002). Developing a framework for ethically questionable behavior in consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(1), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K., & Ennew, C. (2010). What we believe is not always what we do: An empirical investigation into ethically questionable behavior in consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukukawa, K., Ennew, C., & Diacon, S. (2007). An eye for an eye: Investigating the impact of consumer perception of corporate unfairness on aberrant consumer behavior. In Insurance ethics for a more ethical world (pp. 187–221). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Retail Theft Barometer (2014–2015). http://www.globalretailtheftbarometer.com/. Accessed 24 Mar 2017.

  • Hassan, L., Shaw, D., Shiu, E., Walsh, G., & Parry, S. (2013). Uncertainty in ethical consumer choice: A conceptual model. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(3), 182–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. E., Wolfe, S. E., & Marcum, C. D. (2008). Music piracy and neutralization: A preliminary trajectory analysis from short-term longitudinal data. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2(2), 324–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S. (2007). Neutralization theory and online software piracy: An empirical analysis. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(3), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazaki, A. D. (2009). Perceived ethicality of insurance claim fraud: do higher deductibles lead to lower ethical standards? Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 589–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: An investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24(4), 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phau, I., & Ng, J. (2010). Predictors of usage intentions of pirated software. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, K., McNeill, L., Green, J., & Roberts, C. (2012). Illegal downloading, ethical concern, and illegal behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. T., & Clarke, R. V. (2015). Shoplifting of everyday products that serve illicit drug uses. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52(2), 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudbury-Riley, L., & Kohlbacher, F. (2016). Ethically minded consumer behavior: Scale review, development, and validation. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 2697–2710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonglet, M. (2001). Consumer misbehaviour: An exploratory study of shoplifting. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 1(4), 336–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, L. M., & Kuo, C. L. (2014). Customers’ attitudes toward insurance frauds: An application of Adams’ equity theory. International Journal of Social Economics, 41(11), 1038–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2003). Consumer ethics research: Review, synthesis and suggestions for the future. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(1–2), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J. (2015). A case for consumer social responsibility (CnSR): Including a selected review of consumer ethics/social responsibility research. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(4), 767–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitell, S. J., Muncy, J. (2005). The Muncy–Vitell consumer ethics scale: A modification and application. Journal of Business Ethics, 62(3), 267–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, C. (2011). Theory of planned behavior and ethics theory in digital piracy: An integrated model. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciprian-Marcel Pop .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pop, CM., Romonţi-Maniu, AI., Zaharie, MM. (2019). Investigating the Different Roles of the Factors Affecting Ethically Questionable Consumer Behaviour. In: Văduva, S., Wilt, R., Fotea, I., Văduva, L. (eds) Civil Society: The Engine for Economic and Social Well-Being. GSMAC 2017. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89872-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics