Skip to main content

Contributory Factors Leading Behavioral Health Disability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Behavioral Health Disability Management
  • 408 Accesses

Abstract

There several ways that iatrogenic BH disability can occur through actions of (1) the individual, (2) TPs, (3) employers, (4) attorneys, and (5) insurers. The contributions and nuances of each and how these multiple factors can lead to iatrogenic BH disability will be examined further.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM). (2008). Occupational medicine practice guidelines: Evaluation and management of common health problems and functional recovery in workers (3rd ed.). Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Health Information Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s Stay-at-Work and Return-to-Work Process Improvement Committee, Christian, J., Martin, D., Brown, D., Colledge, A., Gean, C., et al. (2006). Introduction to ACOEM’s new work disability prevention guideline: “Preventing needless work disability by helping people stay employed”. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 48(9), 972–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Medical Association (AMA). (2008). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (6th ed.). Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (ApA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Foundation’s Partnership for Workplace Mental Health. (2005). Assessing and treating psychiatric occupational disability, executive report. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronoff, G. M., Mandel, S., Genovese, E., et al. (2007). Evaluating malingering in contested injury or illness. Pain Practice, 7(2), 178–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, L. M., & Rohling, M. L. (1996). Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the effects of financial incentives on recovery after closed head injury. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, C. M. (1996). Psychiatric aspects of fitness for duty. Occupational Medicine, 11(4), 719–726. 443.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Disability Management Employer Coalition (DMEC). (2009). Tools of the trade: A compilation of programs and processes for the absence, disability, health and productivity professional. San Diego, CA: Disability Management Employer Coalition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disability Management Employer Coalition (DMEC). (2016). DMEC 2016 employer behavioral risk survey. San Diego, CA: Disability Management Employer Coalition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, L. H., Anfang, S. A., Drukteinis, A. M., et al. (2008). AAPL practice guideline for the forensic evaluation of psychiatric disability. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36(Suppl. 4), S3–S50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, L. H., & Davidson, J. E. (2007). Do you understand your risk? Liability and third-party evaluations in civil litigation. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35, 200–210. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1mlf3vT

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, L. H., & Shuman, D. W. (2009). Employment evaluations and the law. In Evaluating mental health disability in the workplace (pp. 25–42). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. M. (Ed.). (2003a). Forensic psychology: Vol. 11 of handbook of psychology. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. M. (2003b). Overview of forensic psychology. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Vol. 11 of handbook of psychology (pp. 3–20). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. A., & Shuman, D. W. (1997). Irreconcilable conflict between therapeutic and forensic roles. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 28, 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, R. L. (2007). Forensic applications of the Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory-2. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles (pp. 73–96). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjistavropoulos, T., & Bieling, P. (2001). File review consultation in the adjudication of mental health and chronic pain disability claims. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 53(1), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamm, R. M., Reiss, D. M., Paul, R. K., & Bursztajn, H. J. (2007). Knocking at the wrong door: Insured workers’ inadequate psychiatric care and workers’ compensation claims. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 416–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, T. P. (2004). Psychiatric disability and clinical decision making: The impact of judgment error and bias. Clinical Psychology Review, 24, 707–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilburn, K. (2001). Principles of forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilburn, K., Grisso, T., & Goldstein, A. M. (2009). Foundations of forensic mental health assessment. New York: Oxford University Press. 180pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilburn, K., Marczyk, G., & DeMatteo, D. (2002). Forensic mental health assessment: A casebook. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilburn, K., Marczyk, G., DeMatteo, D., & Mack-Allen, J. (2007). A principles-based approach to forensic mental health assessment: Utility and update. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles (pp. 45–72). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilburn, K., Marczyk, G., DeMatteo, D., Zillmer, E., Harris, J., & Jennings, T. (2003). Principles of forensic mental health assessment: Implications for neuropsychological assessment in forensic contexts. Assessment, 10, 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilburn, K., Warren, J., & Picarello, K. (2003). Third party information in forensic assessment. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Vol. 11 of handbook of psychology (pp. 69–86). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, J. P., & Langlieb, A. M. (Eds.). (2005). Mental health and productivity in the workplace: A handbook for organizations and clinicians. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kane, A. W. (2008). Forensic psychology, psychological injuries, and the law. Psychological Injury and Law, 1(1), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-007-9000-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper, P., Tu, H. T., Reschovsky, J. D., & Schaefer, E. (2002). Insurance product design and its effects: Trade-offs along the managed care continuum. Inquiry, 39(2), 101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melhorn, J. M., & Ackerman, W. E. (Eds.). (2008). Guides to the evaluation of disease and injury causation. Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, G., Petrila, J., Poythress, N., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittenberg, W., Patton, C., Canyock, E. M., & Condit, D. C. (2002). Base rates of malingering and symptom exaggeration. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(8), 1094–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Business Group on Health (NBGH). (2007). An employer’s guide to behavioral health services. Washington, DC: National Business Group on Health. 100pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norquist, G. S., & Regier, D. A. (1996). The epidemiology of psychiatric disorders and the de facto mental health care system. Annual Review of Medicine, 47, 473–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K., Slobogin, C., & Greenberg, S. A. (2007). Legal and ethical issues in accessing and utilizing third-party information. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles (pp. 190–208). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pransky, G. S., Shaw, W. S., Franche, R. L., & Clarke, A. (2004). Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers: Current models and opportunities for improvement. Disability & Rehabilitation, 26(11), 625–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. C., Gatchel, R. J., & Whitfill, T. (2005). Tailoring psychosocial treatment for patients with occupational disability. In I. Z. Schultz & R. J. Gatchel (Eds.), Handbook of complex occupational disability claims: Early risk identification, intervention, and prevention. New York: Springer Science + Business Media. 566pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (Ed.). (1988). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R. (Ed.). (1997). Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., & Bender, S. D. (2003). Evaluation of malingering and deception. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Vol. 11 of handbook of psychology (pp. 109–132). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohling, M. L., Binder, L. M., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (1995). Money matters: A meta-analytic review of the association between financial compensation and the experience and treatment of chronic pain. Health Psychology, 14, 537–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, I. Z., & Gatchel, R. J. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of complex occupational disability claims. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R., & Gold, L. (2004). Psychiatric diagnosis in litigation. In R. Simon & L. Gold (Eds.), Textbook of forensic psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmage, J. B. (2007). Failure to communicate: How terminology and forms confuse the work ability/disability evaluation process. Journal of Insurance Medicine, 39, 192–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talmage, J. B., & Melhorn, J. M. (Eds.). (2005). A physician’s guide to return to work. Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J., LeBourgeois, H., & Black, R. (2004). Malingering. In R. Simon & L. Gold (Eds.), Textbook of forensic psychiatry (pp. 427–448). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gorp, W. (2007). Neuropsychology for the forensic psychologist. In A. M. Goldstein (Ed.), Forensic psychology: Emerging topics and expanding roles (pp. 154–170). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. S., Demler, O., & Kessler, R. C. (2002). Adequacy of treatment for serious mental illness in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 92(1), 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P. A. (2003). The evaluation of stress concerns in the workplace. Duke University Return to Work Newsletter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P. A. (2009). Behavioral health as a causation issue in workers’ compensation and disability claims. IAIABC Journal, 46(2), 17–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P. A. (2013a). Those who hesitate are lost: The case for setting behavioral health treatment and disability standards, part I. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(3), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P. A. (2013b). Those who hesitate are lost: The case for setting behavioral health treatment and disability standards, part I. Psychological Injury and Law, 6(3), 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P. A., & Hubbard, J. D. (2006). The disability claims process and determining mental health diagnoses versus workplace dissatisfaction. American Academy of Disability Evaluating Physicians, 5(2), 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, P. A., & Hubbard, J. D. (2008). Psychosocial issues related to behavioral health disability claims. Fort Dearborn National Insurance Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. C. (2008). AAPL guideline for forensic evaluation of psychiatric disabilities: A disability law perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 36(4), 558–562.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, I., & Hess, A. (Eds.). (2005). The handbook of forensic psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, S. D. (1998). Deception and detection in psychiatric diagnosis. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 21(4), 869–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., Kane, A. W., & Nicholson, K. (2007). Causality of psychological injury: Presenting evidence in court. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Warren, P.A. (2018). Contributory Factors Leading Behavioral Health Disability. In: Warren, P. (eds) Handbook of Behavioral Health Disability Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89860-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics