Skip to main content

The Myth of Shakespearean Authenticity: Neoliberalism and Humanistic Shakespeare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Local and Global Myths in Shakespearean Performance

Part of the book series: Reproducing Shakespeare ((RESH))

Abstract

The chapter explores the ways in which nominally subversive performances of Shakespeare negotiate the complex terrain of twenty-first-century North-American culture, frequently subverting its core messages. As a case study, Kostihova analyzes the ways in which the second season of Canadian TV series Slings and Arrows (2003–06) ostensibly resists neoliberal market consumerism, only to come to undermine its own message through an inexorable endorsement of social neoconservatism, thus nullifying its nominal commitment to using Shakespeare as a restorer of humanist critical thinking and individualism.

This work is an extension of two combined presentations. The work on Macbeth in its early stages was presented as a contribution to the “Staging Shakespeare Myths” seminar at the Shakespeare and Myth conference organized by the European Shakespeare Research Association (ESRA) in June 2013. The section on Romeo and Juliet was first presented at an annual meeting of the Popular Culture Association in 2012. Many thanks to colleagues, both at these meetings and at my home institution (Hamline University), who asked incisive questions and provided the necessary feedback that helped to move the project toward its current iteration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The length limitations for this chapter necessitate that I gloss over this potentially contentious issue. Please see the References section, particularly, works by Naomi Klein (2007) and David Harvey (2005), as an excellent foray into the conversation about the theoretical framework and practiced structures of both neoliberalism and neoconservatism.

  2. 2.

    Here, I will refer an interested reader primarily to Lisa Duggan’s work (2003).

  3. 3.

    Here, I will gesture toward the numerous works by cultural materialists—particularly the work of Jonathan Dollimore and Alan Sinfield (1985), Jean Howard and Marion F. O’Connor (1987), and Terrence Hawkes (2002)—as a departure point for considering the political implications of the insistence on transcendental qualities of Shakespeare’s work and cultural capital.

  4. 4.

    For an inspired and detailed analysis of camerawork and editorial crosscutting that privileges Tennant’s Shakespeare over that of his (male) director rivals, please see L. Monique Pittman’s Authorizing Shakespeare on Film and Television (2011), particularly Chap. 6.

  5. 5.

    This moment has been captured, albeit in questionable quality, on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHLLqhxSWYY (November 27, 2017).

References

  • Dollimore, Jonathan, and Alan Sinfield, eds. 1985. Political Shakespeare: Essays in Cultural Materialism. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, Lisa. 2003. The Twilight of Equality?: Neoliberalism, Cultural Politics, and the Attack on Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, Terrence. 2002. Shakespeare in The Present. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holderness, Graham, ed. 1988. The Shakespeare Myth. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, ed. 2001. Visual Shakespeare: Essays in Film and Television. Hatfiled: University of Hertfordshire Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Jean E., and Marion F. O’Connor. 1987. Introduction. In Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology, ed. Jean E. Howard and Marion F. O’Connor. New York/London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Naomi. 2007. The Shock Doctrine. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, Monique L. 2011. Authorizing Shakespeare on Film and Television: Gender, Class, and Ethnicity in Adaptation. New York: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slings and Arrows Sweeps Gemini Awards. November 6, 2006. Vancouver Sun at Canada.com . Accessed 14 Aug 2014.

  • Wellington, Peter, dir. 2003–06. Slings and Arrows, seasons 1–3. Acorn Media.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kostihova, M. (2018). The Myth of Shakespearean Authenticity: Neoliberalism and Humanistic Shakespeare. In: Mancewicz, A., Joubin, A. (eds) Local and Global Myths in Shakespearean Performance. Reproducing Shakespeare. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89851-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics