Shakespeare Sanitized for the Present: Political Myths in Recent Adaptations

  • Frank Widar Brevik
Part of the Reproducing Shakespeare book series (RESH)


This chapter analyzes recent Shakespeare film adaptations and stage performances from a presentist perspective, focusing on political myth production. It tackles the fruitful tensions that result from adapting the Shakespeare of the textual and theatrical past into contemporary films. It examines the politics of Michael Almereyda’s Hamlet (2000), Julie Taymor’s The Tempest (2010), and Michael Radford’s The Merchant of Venice (2004) as complicit in an effort to simplify and misrepresent a textual Shakespeare in favour of a depoliticized myth. In stark contrast, two chosen theatre productions, Alex Scherpf’s Hamlet (2003) and Jatinder Verma’s The Tempest (2008), support the thesis that the theatre re-fangs and re-complicates a Shakespeare who speaks meaningfully about current ideas concerning cultural conflicts and the nation-state.


  1. Adorno, Theodor, and Max Horkheimer. 1948. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum, 1993. 30 September 2014.
  2. Coursen, H.R. 1997. Teaching Shakespeare with Film and Television: A Guide. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  3. Evans, Katherine. 2008. Review of Shakespeare’s The Tempest (Directed by Jatinder Verma for Tara Arts) at the Arts Theatre, London. Shakespeare. Reinventing Digital Shakespeare 4 (3): 320–323.Google Scholar
  4. Friedmann, Micheal D. 2013. Where Was He Born? Speak! Tell Me!: Julie Taymor’s Tempest, Hawaiian Slavery, and the Birther Controversy. Shakespeare Bulletin 31 (3 Fall): 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Guneratne, Anthony R. 2008. Shakespeare, Film Studies, and the Visual Cultures of Modernity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hamlet. 2000. Dir. Michael Almereyda. Perf. Ethan Hawke, Kyle MacLachlan, Bill Murray, and Julia Stiles. Miramax Films.Google Scholar
  7. Hamlet I Is. (Hamlet in Ice). 2003. NRK2. Oslo, Norway.Google Scholar
  8. Hawkes, Terence. 2002a. Shakespeare in the Present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. ———. 2002b. There’s No Escaping the Warwickshire Lad. New Statesman, October 14, 2002. 30 2014.
  10. Macey, David. 2001. Dictionary of Critical Theory. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Manninen, Mari. 2003. Hamlet Steams in the Lappish Freezer: Shakespeare on the Rocks at the Jukkasjärvi Globe Theatre. Helsingin Sanomat International Edition, January 28, 2003. 30 September 2014.
  12. McDonald, Russ. 2001. The Bedford Companion to Shakespeare. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  13. Pittman, L. Monique. 2010. Authorizing Shakespeare on Film and Television: Gender, Class, and Ethnicity in Adaptation. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Prospero’s Books. 1990. Dir. Peter Greenaway. Perf. Sir John Gielgud and Jack Birkett.Google Scholar
  15. Sokol, B.J. 2003. A Brave New World of Knowledge: Shakespeare’s The Tempest and Early Modern Epistemology. London: Associated University Press.Google Scholar
  16. The Merchant of Venice. 2004, Dir. Michael Radford. Perf. Al Pacino. UK Film Council.Google Scholar
  17. The Tempest. 1979. Dir. Derek Jarman. Perf. Heathcote Williams and Jack Birkett. London Films.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2008. Dir. Jatinder Verma. Tara Arts Theatre. London.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2010. Dir. Julie Taymor. Perf. Helen Mirren, Tom Conti, and Djimon Hounsou. Miramax Films.Google Scholar
  20. Vaughan, Alden T., and Virginia Mason. 1991. Shakespeare’s Caliban: A Cultural History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Walsh, David. 2000. Youth’s Anguish. World Socialist Website.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Widar Brevik
    • 1
  1. 1.Savannah College of Art and DesignSavannahUSA

Personalised recommendations