Evolution of the Post-soviet Caspian Sea Legal Regime

Chapter

Abstract

Despite more than two decades since the collapse of the Soviet Union and several conventions and meetings, Caspian littoral countries have been unable to agree on the Sea’s legal regime. Geography, self-allocations of coastal regions, the race to develop massive oil and gas reserves, and the presence of trans-regional powers have all contributed to disparate views on possession and the determination of boundary lines. This chapter reviews successive agreements between Iran and both the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. This is then followed by a discussion of sundry reasons for the failure of littoral countries to reach a consensus on a new legal regime with a special focus given to political and economic competition between regional and trans-regional players.

Keywords

Caspian Sea Legal regime Legal status Caspian Sea littoral states Energy resources Caspian Sea cooperation organization 

References

  1. Aghai Diba. B. (2004). The legal regime of the Caspian Sea: Any changes in the position of Iran? Online at http://www.payvand.com/news/04/feb/1169.html. Accessed Nov 25, 2017.
  2. Ahmadian, Q., & Gholami, T. (2010). Asiya-ye Markazi va Qafghaz dar Arse-ye Taaroz-e Manafe-e Rusiye va Qarb (Central Asia and the caucasus as a conflict area of interests between Russia and the West). Motale’at-e Orasiya-ye Markazi (Central Eurasian Studies): Center of International Studies, Faculty of Law and Political Science, 2(4), 13.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmadi-Pour, Z. (2001). Jeopolotice Iran ba’d az Jange Sard (Iran’s geopolitics after the Cold War). Pajouheshhaye Joghrafiyai Journal, 39, 42.Google Scholar
  4. Asadi-kiya, B. (1995). A glance at the legal status of the Caspian Sea. Evening Daily, 16.Google Scholar
  5. Azhdari, B., & Qaeini, H. (2012). Naqsh-e Amrica va Rusiye dar Tain-e Rejim-e Hoquqiye Daryay-e Khazar (America and Russia’s role in determining the legal regime of the Caspian Sea). Domahnae-ye Tahavolate Iran va Orasiya (Journal of developments in Iran and Eurasia), 35, 28.Google Scholar
  6. Bahgat, G. (2005). Oil and terrorism: Central Asia and the Caucasus. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 30(3), 265–281.Google Scholar
  7. Bavand, D. H. (2008). Barresi-ye Rejim-e Hoquqi-ye Darya-ye Khazar Dar Mosahebe ba Doctor Hermidas Bavand (The legal regime of the Caspian Sea in an interview with Dr. Hermidas Bavand). Gozaresh, 17(192), 9–12.Google Scholar
  8. Bijani, M. (2003). Khazar va Manafe’-e Jomhouri-ye Islami-ye Iran (Caspian and Interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran). Tehran: Markaz-e Motale’at-e Sepah.Google Scholar
  9. Blank, S. (2011). Caspian basin: Frustration mounting, Moscow talks about militarizing. Eurasianets Weekly Digest. At: http://www.eurasianet.org/node/63470. Accessed on Dec 12, 2017.
  10. Damirchilu, M. (2007). Nagah-e Iran-i be Syr-e Tahavolat-e Rejim-e Hoquqi-ye Darya-ye Khazar (Iranian point of view on the evolution of the legal regime of the Caspian Sea). Faslname-ye Motale’at-e Asiya-ye Markazi va Qafqaz (The Journal of Caucasus and Central Asian Studies), 4(53), 159–186.Google Scholar
  11. Ebrahimi, S., & Mohammadi, M. (2011). Reqabat-e Rousi-ye va Amrica dar Qafqaz-e Markazi (1991–2010) (Russia-South America Rivalry in the Southern Caucasus). Motale’at-e Orasiya-ye Markazi (Central Eurasian Studies), 4(8), 6.Google Scholar
  12. Etaat, J., Nusrati, H. R., & Varzesh, I. (2012). Avamel-e Mo’aser dar Adam-e Ta’in-e Khotout-e Marzi-ye Daryai-ye Keshvarha-ye Saheli Darya-ye Khazar (Effective factors in the lack of determining the maritime borders of the Caspian Littoral Countries). Faslname-ye Rahbord (Journal of Rahbord), 20(61), 129.Google Scholar
  13. Fayazi, M. (2008). Reqabat Piramoun-e Enerji-ye Asiya-ye Markazi va Qafqaz (Competition on the energy of Central Asia and Caucasus). Faslname-ye Asiya-ye Markazi va Qafqaz (Journal of Central Asia and Caucasus), 60, 141–168.Google Scholar
  14. Ghafouri, M. (2008). The Caspian Sea: Rivalry and cooperation. Middle East Policy, 15(2), 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godzimirski, J. M. (2008). Putin and post-soviet identity: Building blocks and buzz words. Problems of Post-communism, 55(5), 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heidari-Manesh, A. H. (2009). Rejim-e Hoquqi-ye Darya-ye Khazar va Konvansion-e Hoquq-e Daryaha (The Caspian Sea legal regime and the convention on the law of the Sea). Majale-ye Oloum-e Siyasi (Political Science Magazine), 217, 71.Google Scholar
  17. Hersani, S. (2006). Charchoube Teorike Siyasate Amrica dar Hozeye Daryaye Khazar (Theoretical framework of America’s policy in the Caspian region). Khabargozariye Mehr (Mehr News Agency), 12, 41.Google Scholar
  18. Kamran, H., Nami, A. M. H., Ja’fari, F., & Mohammadpour, A. (2010). Regim-e Hoqouqi va Tahdid-e Hodoud-e Darya-ye Khazar (The legal regime and restriction of the Caspian Sea Ambit). Majale-ye Goqrafi (Geography Magazine), 7(20, 21), 25–46.Google Scholar
  19. Koulaei, E. (1997). Nirouhay-e Pasdar-e Solh-e Rousiye, Bimha va Omidha (Russian peacekeepers, fears, and hopes). Faslname-ye Motale’at-e Asiyay-e Markazi va Qafqaz (Caucasus and Central Asian Studies), 2(15), 215–228.Google Scholar
  20. Kumar, P. (2009). The unrealized dream of Caspian Oil. International Politics, 2(4), 13.Google Scholar
  21. Mamedov, R. (2001). International legal status of the Caspian Sea: Issues of theory and practice. Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 32, 217–259.Google Scholar
  22. Mehdiyoun, K. (2000). Ownership of oil and gas resources in the Caspian Sea. The American Journal of International Law, 94(1), 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mirfakhrai, S. (2005). Rejim-e Hoqouqi-ye Daryay-e Khazar az Vagarai ta Hamgarai (Caspian Sea legal regime, from divergence to convergence). Pajouhesh-e Hoqouq va Siyasat (Law and Politics Studies Studies), 10, 179–200.Google Scholar
  24. Mojtahed-Zadeh, P. (1999). Regime Hoqouqi-ye Daryay-e Khazar, Lozoum-e Tabyen-e Manafe-e Melli (The Caspian Sea’s legal regime, the necessity of defining national interests). Tehran: Moasese-ye Ettelaat.Google Scholar
  25. Mojtahed-Zadeh, P. (2009). Didgahha-ye Qeye Karshenasi va Chalesh-e Manafe-e Melli dar Daryay-e Khazar (Non-expert viewpoints on the challenges of national interests in the Caspian Sea). Bandar va Darya (The Harbour and the Sea), 15, 5–70.Google Scholar
  26. Navazani, B. (1991). Ahdname-ye Mavaddat-e Iran va Shoravi (The Soviet-Iran Friendship Treaty). Tehran: Nashre Hamrah.Google Scholar
  27. Ögütçü, M. (2003). Caspian energy and legal disputes: Prospects for settlement. Oil, Gas & Energy Law Journal (OGEL), 1(2). At: https://www.ogel.org/article.asp?key=100. Accessed on Dec 12, 2017.
  28. Omidi, A. (2006). Ijaad-e Mantaqe-ye Moshtarek, Raah-e Halli baray-e Boron Raft az Bonbast-e Rejim-e Hoqouqi-ye Daryay-e Khazar (Creating a communal region as a solution for excluding the deadlock of the Caspian Sea Legal Regime. Faslname-ye Motaleat-e Asiya-ye Markazi va Qafqaz (Caucasus and Central Studies Journal), IV (4), 177–194.Google Scholar
  29. Riyahi, M. A. (1990). Sefarat Nameha-ye Iran, Gozaresh-e Mosaferat va Mamouriyathay-e Safiran-e Osmani dar Iran (The Iranian Embassy, letters travel and mission reports of Ottoman Ambassador in Iran). Tehran: Tous Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Shariat Bagheri, M. J., & Jahani, F. (2001). Tahavolat-e Rejim-e Bahrebardariy az Manaf-e Moshtarek-e Naft va Gaz-e Darya-ye Mazandaran (Operational regime changes of communal oil and gas resources of the Caspian Sea). Faslname-ye Rahbord (Journal of Rahbord), 20(58), 147.Google Scholar
  31. Shouri, M. (2007). Naft-o Gaz-e Khazar; Taghabol-e Mnafe’ (Oil and gas of the Caspian Sea; The contrast of interests). In Asian Energy, 8. http://www.isrjournals.com/fa/special-articles/1083-special-article-farsi53.html. Accessed on Dec 12, 2017).
  32. Torabi, S. (2002). Moshabehatha va Moqayeratha dar Mavaze-e Keshvarhay-e Saheli-ye Khazar (Similarities and Discrepancies in the positions of the Caspian Littoral Countries). Faslname-ye Motale’at-e Asiya-ye Markazi va Qafqaz (Journal of Central Asia and the Caucasus Studies), 35, 97–110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law, Applied Art and Culture CenterScience—Education UniversityNowshahrIran
  2. 2.Department of Political Science, Faculty of Literature and HumanitiesUniversity of Guilan‎RashtIran

Personalised recommendations