Skip to main content

Introduction: The Russian Heartland Versus the British World Island

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 203 Accesses

Abstract

The themes discussed hold meaningful connections between geography, state power (economic, military and political) and political decision-making in the scramble between Russia and Britain to control and delineate Persian territory. The objective of our introduction is to examine political geography within the context of nineteenth-century colonial contests for power, influence, territory and resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Persia ’ is the previous name of Iran , which Reza Shah (Reza Khan , Riz̤ā Shāh) changed to ‘Iran ’ in 1935. In this study, ‘Iran ’ or ‘Iranian Government’ refers to all periods of time excepting certain treaties or specific phrases and quotation.

  2. 2.

    Mackinder was associated with the founding of the Geographical Association in 1893, with the objective of familiarizing ‘Britain ’s young with distant colonial prospects.’

  3. 3.

    Mackinder ’s Heartland Theory, as propounded in the twentieth century, predicted the waning of Britain as the world island sea power unless Britain checked the rising power of the Russia . It should be noted that by the late nineteenth century, with Germany ’s desire to create a super naval power, Britain shifted its focus to Germany , which was perceived as an unnecessary luxury; therefore, it was not surprising that naval power proved a battleground for supremacy among European powers during WWI .

  4. 4.

    In the legendary dialogue between Athens and Melos in 430 BC, the former declared that the latter’s purported ‘neutrality’ during a conflict between Athens and Sparta was tantamount to supporting Sparta and said that Melos would therefore be conquered by Athens. Melians were given the choice of abandoning their allegiance to Sparta and paying tribute to Athens, or facing the consequences if they failed to comply. Thucydides described this dialogue in his timeless masterpiece, The History of Peloponnesian War. Considered the epitome of realist thought, it demonstrates that states engage in politics for the sole objective of self-aggrandisement and power over others. The Athenians made what they considered to be a generous offer to the Melians but threatened to use raw power against them if it wasn’t accepted: ‘the standard of justice depends on the equality of power to compel … in fact, the strong do what they have the power to do and the weak accept what they have to accept.’ The Melians rejected the Athenian position and appealed to their sense of justice, expecting the rule of law would allow the exercise of mercy on a weak state: ‘[Athenians] should not destroy a principle that is to the general good of all men, namely, that in the case of all who fall into danger there should be such a thing as fair play and just dealing…’ (Unoki 2016: 10). The Melians argued that by believing in what they thought was right, God would save them, to which Athens retorted: ‘It is a general and necessary law of nature to rule wherever one can … and we know that you or anybody else with the same power as ours would be acting in precisely the same way’ (Unoki 2016: 9). The refusal of the Melians to denounce utopian idealism and accept Athenian realism caused the latter to condemn the Melian position as a ‘lack of common sense’ and a ‘false sense of honour’. The aftermath was the siege of Melos by Athens, mass slaughter of their men and enslavement of their women in a cold-blooded manner. Thucydides observed that powerful states like Athens compel weaker states to follow their perspectives and dictates or face the consequences of not doing so.

  5. 5.

    The Caspian Sea was designated a ‘Sea’ by the 1982 UN Convention on Laws of the Seas and meets the requirements of a ‘Closed Sea ’ under International Law.

  6. 6.

    Early records showing the inscription of Assyrian King Adadnerrari III date to the eighth and ninth centuries BCE. They read: ‘The Great Sea of Sunrise’ (or The Great Eastern Sea). See (Zonn et al. 2010: 198).

  7. 7.

    It was reported that a British secret intelligence officer, Captain Arthur Connolly, who was beheaded in 1846 in Bukhara alongside his compatriot, Captain Charles Stoddart, introduced the term, ‘Great Game’. Before his execution he indicated that the Great Game was conducted in Asian territories between Britain and Russia . This scenario was often referred to as ‘Great Game I’. It was also used to describe the struggle between both European colonial powers over oil and gas resources in the Caspian Sea (Zonn et al. 2010: 198).

  8. 8.

    Encyclopedia Britannica. Crimean War: Eurasian History (18531856). Online at https://global.britannica.com/event/Crimean-War (accessed 1 May 2017).

  9. 9.

    In fact, after World War II, the British and Americans used their influence to control most of the political movements of nationalisation as well as efforts in democracy in the Middle Eastern countries by any means. The British plot and American operation to remove Iran ’s democratically elected Prime Minister from power in 1953 is one of the obvious instances which prove the leverage of both powers in Iran (Ebrahimi and Yusoff 2015).

References

  • Agoston, G., & Masters, B. (2009). Encyclopaedia of the Ottoman Empire. New York: Facts On File, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashtiyani, A. I. (2005). Tarikh-e Iran az Sadr-e Islam ta Enqeraz-e Qajariyye (Iran’s history from early Islam to the collapse of the Qajar Dynasty). Tehran: Samt Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahgat, G. (2005). Oil and terrorism: Central Asia and the Caucasus. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 30(3), 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroujerdi, A., Ansari-Zadeh, S., & Karami, M. (2011). Zheoeconomy-e Darya-ye Khazar va Ta’sir-e an bar Amniat-e Enerzhi-ye Etehadiye-ye Ouropa (The geoeconomy of the caspian sea and its impact on the energy security of the European Union). Faslname-ye Rahbord (Journal of Rahbord), 20(60), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K. R., Low, M., & Robinson, J. (2008). Introduction: Political geography: Traditions and turns. In: K. R. Cox, M. Low, & J. Robinson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of political geography. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi, M. (2016). The British role in Iranian domestic politics (1951–1953). Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi, M., & Yusoff, K. (2015). The British plot to remove Iran’s democratically elected Prime Minister from power. Acta Histriae, 23(4), 735–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopedia Britannica. Crimean War: Eurasian History (1853–1856). At: https://global.britannica.com/event/Crimean-War (May 1, 2017).

  • Kearns, G. (1993). Fin de siècle geopolitics: Mackinder, hobson and theories of global closure. In P. J. Taylor (Ed.), Political geography of the twentieth century. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, G. (2009). Geopolitics and empire: The legacy of Halford Mackinder. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. (1994). Diplomacy. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laruelle, M., & Peyrouse, S. (2009). The militarization of the Caspian Sea: ‘Great Games’ and ‘Small Games’ Over the Caspian Fleets. China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, 7(2), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, S. (2002). British foreign policy 1874–1914: The role of India. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGowan, P. J., Cornelissen, S., & Nel, P. (Eds.). (1999). Power, wealth and global equity: An international relations textbook for Africa. Lansdowne: University of Capetown Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slowe, P. M. (1990). Geography and political power: The geography of nations and states. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terterov, M., Pool, J. V., & Nagornyy, S. (2010). Russian geopolitical power in the Black and Caspian Seas region: Implications for Turkey and the World. Insight Turkey, 12(3), 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (Ed.). (1993). Political geography of the twentieth century. London: Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unoki, K. (2016). International Relations and the origins of the pacific war. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Valdani, A. J. (1998). Barresi-ye Ahdname-ye 1975, Iran va Iraq (Review of 1975 Iran-Iraq Treaty). Mahnameh Itila‘at-e Siyasi Ightisadi (Monthly Politics-Economy Information), 247–248, 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. (1977). The English amongst the Persians: Imperial lives in nineteenth-century Iran. London: IB Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonn, I. S., Kosarev, A. N., Glantz, M. H., & Kostianoy, A. G. (2010). The Caspian Sea encyclopedia. Heidelberg-Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mansoureh Ebrahimi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ebrahimi, M., Gassama, S.K., Yusoff, K. (2019). Introduction: The Russian Heartland Versus the British World Island. In: Ebrahimi, M., Rad Goudarzi, M., Yusoff, K. (eds) The Dynamics of Iranian Borders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89836-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics