Abstract
Cryptocurrencies have recently gained a lot of interest from investors, central banks and governments worldwide. The lack of any form of political regulation and their market far from being “efficient”, require new forms of regulation in the near future. From an econometric viewpoint, the process underlying the evolution of the cryptocurrencies’ volatility has been found to exhibit at the same time differences and similarities with other financial time-series, e.g. foreign exchanges returns. This short note focuses on predicting the conditional volatility of the four most traded cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and Ripple. We investigate the effect of accounting for long memory in the volatility process as well as its asymmetric reaction to past values of the series to predict: 1 day, 1 and 2 weeks volatility levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Note that the cryptocurrency market trades 24 h a day, all days. Here with closing value we mean the price at (UTC) midnight.
- 2.
All series are available from https://coinmarketcap.com.
References
Andersen, T.G., Bollerslev, T.: Answering the skeptics: yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. Int. Econ. Rev. 39(4), 885–905 (1998)
Bernardi, M., Catania, L.: The model confidence set package for R. Int. J. Comput. Econ. Econ. 8(2), 144–158 (2018)
Bollerslev, T.: Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J. Econ. 31, 307–327 (1986)
Catania, L., Grassi, S.: Modelling crypto-currencies financial time-series. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3028486 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3028486 (16 Aug 2017)
Creal, D., Koopman, S.J., Lucas, A.: Generalized autoregressive score models with applications. J. Appl. Econ. 28, 777–795 (2013)
Hansen, P.R., Lunde, A., Nason, J.M.: The model confidence set. Econometrica 79(2), 453–497 (2011)
Harvey, A.C.: Dynamic Models for Volatility and Heavy Tails: With Applications to Financial and Economic Time Series, vol. 52. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)
Patton, A.J.: Volatility forecast comparison using imperfect volatility proxies. J. Econ. 160(1), 246 – 256 (2011), Realized Volatility
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Catania, L., Grassi, S., Ravazzolo, F. (2018). Predicting the Volatility of Cryptocurrency Time-Series. In: Corazza, M., Durbán, M., Grané, A., Perna, C., Sibillo, M. (eds) Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Actuarial Sciences and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89824-7_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89824-7_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89823-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89824-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)