Skip to main content

Applying Behavior Change Theory to Predict Travel Behavior of University Commuters

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Practice of Spatial Analysis

Abstract

Selecting the right alternatives to an existing travel mode for commuting to a major trip generator at the center of a metropolitan area is often a complex project. In this chapter, the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece is the major trip generator in a study that compares the predictions of two approaches, both of which use discrete choice modeling, regarding the number of commuters who are willing to change travel mode if the right alterative is offered to them. The first is the conventional approach that, using travel cost and travel time as the main travel mode choice determinants, is applied to a selected (aggregate) sample of the commuter population. The second approach uses the same determinants but stratifies the sample into four strata according to the behavioral change stage to which the commuters belong. The model results indicate that the predicted travel mode choice behavior differs significantly among the persons in the sample depending on which behavioral change stage they are in. This study suggests that transport policy makers might better devise targeted interventions to maximize the positive socioeconomic and environmental impacts of travel mode alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R., Krohn, M., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevish, M. (1989). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, A., & Giurco, D. (2011). Campus sustainability: Climate change, transport and paper reduction. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(3), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attard M., Bajada T., & Gauci P. (2014) Green Transport Plan for the Msida Campus-University of Malta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baboulet, O., & Lenzen, M. (2010). Evaluating the environmental performance of a university. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1134–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2007). Cognitive dissonance and the perception of natural environments. Psychological Science, 18(10), 917–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsas, C. J. (2003). Sustainable transportation planning on college campuses. Transport Policy, 10(1), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, Α. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Akiva, M. E., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: Theory and application to travel demand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, J., Mason, C., & Stanley, K. (1999). Travel Demand Management: Policy context and an application by the University of New South Wales (UNSW) as a Large Trip Generator. Transport Engineering in Australia, 5(2), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black D., Sloan-Rossiter S., Ng A.,Guidoboni E., & Cranshaw W. (2011, December). Campus Transportation Plan, University of Massachusetts Lowell. Prepared by Vanase Hangen Brustlin Inc for the University of Massachusetts Lowell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, H., & Seydel, E. R. (1996). Protection motivation theory. In M. Connor & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behavior. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, A., & Steiner, R. (2006). Sustainable campus transportation through transit partnership and transportation demand management: A case study from the University of Florida. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19(1), 125–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., Hess, D. B., & Shoup, D. (2003). Fare-free public transit at universities an evaluation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(1), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., & Land, K. C. (1986). Testing the Health Belief Model: LISREL analysis of alternative models of causal relationships between health beliefs and preventive dental behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 49(1), 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K., & Wyse, D. (2010). A guide to teaching practice. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, R., & Collins, S. (2015). Reflections on winning the smarter travel campus of the year award. In: Proceedings of the ITRN2015, 27-28th August 2015, NUI Galway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, T. M., Dalton, C., Loo, J., & Benakoun, L. (2008). Developing ecological footprint scenarios on university campuses: A case study of the University of Toronto at Mississauga. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daggett, J., & Gutkowski, R. (2003). University transportation survey: Transportation in university communities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1835(1), 42–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, R., & Mulley, C. (2013). The paradox of public transport peak spreading: Universities and travel demand management. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(2), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, L. (2003). Dissemination of innovations in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 199–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, J., & Massey, J. (2012). Eco-campus: Applying the ecocity model to develop green university and college campuses. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(2), 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R., & Garling, T. (2007). Cognitive maps and urban travel. Retrieved January 21, 2014, from U.C. Transportation Center: http://www.uctc.net/papers/601.pdf

  • HDR Engineering. (2012, July). Campus Mobility Plan-final report. Retrieved December 2, 2015, from http://www2.acs.ncsu.edu/trans/about/documents/mobility-plan2012.pdf

  • Hess, S., Bierlaire, M., & Polak, J. (2004). Estimation of value-of-time using Mixed Logit models (No. TRANSP-OR-REPORT-2004-006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klockner, C. A., & Matthies, E. (2004). How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 319–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longo, G., Medeossi, G., & Padoano, E. (2015). Multi-criteria analysis to support mobility management at a University Campus. Transportation Research Procedia, 5, 175–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. (2000). Stated choice methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R. A., & MacDonald, R. A. (2001). Sustainable transportation and land use planning at Simon Fraser University: A case study of the Burnaby Mountain Campus (No. MQ-51404 UMI). Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (2007). The Oxford handbook of criminology (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAX. (2007a). Successful travel awareness campaigns and mobility management strategies. Comprehensive State of the Art Report, Annex B1.1, Behaviour Change Models, European Commission, 6th Framework Programme, Integrated Transport Project 518368, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAX. (2007b). Successful travel awareness campaigns and mobility management strategies. Comprehensive State of the Art Report, Annex B1.2, Assessment Tools, European Commission, 6th Framework Programme, Integrated Transport Project 518368, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAX. (2009). MaxSem: Max Self Regulation Model: Applying theory to the design and evaluation of Mobility Management Projects. European Union: Max Partners.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, M., Hall, R., Schreffler, E., Gilliard, E., Sammer, G., Roider, O., & Klementschit, R. (2010, January). Cluster Report 5: Mobility Management, Deliverable D2.2, Civitas-Guard Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson/Nygaard Consulting. (2012, January). Campus Transportation Demand Management Plan.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIH. (2003). NIH Guide. Maintenance of long term behavioral change. Retrieved January 21, 2015, from http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OB-03-003.html

  • Nutbeam, D. (2000). Health literacy as a public health goal: A challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 15(3), 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitsiava-Latinopoulou, M., Basbas, S., & Gavanas, N. (2013). Implementation of alterative transport networks in university campuses: The case of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. International Journal in Higher Education, 14(3), 310–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Politis, I., Papaioannou, P., & Basbas, S. (2012). Integrated choice and latent variable models for evaluating flexible transport mode choice. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 3, 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 390–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prochaska, J. O., & Norcross, J. C. (2001). Stages of change. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 38(4), 443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PTA - Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority, Socioeconomic evaluation of the metro extention to the city of Kalamaria, Final Report, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (2008). Encouraging sustainable campus travel: Self-reported impacts of a university TravelSmart initiative. Journal of Public Transportation, 11(1), 85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, Ι., Strecher, V., & Becker, M. (1994). The Health Belief Model and HIV risk behaviour change. In R. J. DiClemente & J. L. Peterson (Eds.), Preventing AIDS: Theories and methods of behavioral interventions (pp. 5–24). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schlag, B., & Schade, J. (2010). Traffic and transportation psychology. In K. Button & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Transport dictionary. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaheen, S., Rodier, C. J., & Finson, R. S. (2003). University of California, Davis Long-Range Development Plan: A Davis Smart Mobility Model. California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, T., Giles-Corti, B., Pikora, T., Bulsara, M., Shilton, T., & Bull, F. (2006). Active commuting in a university setting: Assessing commuting habits and potential for modal change. Transport Policy, 13(3), 240–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiftan, Y. (2008). The use of activity-based modeling to analyze the effect of land-use policies on travel behavior. Annals of Regional Science, 42, 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, P., & Ferreira, D. (2008, September). European best practice on sustainable mobility in university campus, T.a.T –Students Today, Citizens Tomorrow Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAPESTRY. (2007). TAPESTRY - travel awareness, publicity and education supporting a sustainable transport strategy in Europe. European Commission, 5th Framework Programme, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toor, W., & Havlick, S. (2004). Transportation and sustainable campus communities: Issues, examples, solutions. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Train, K. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • University of Essex. (2015). Travel Plan-Estate Management Section. Retrieved December 2, 2015, from http://www.essex.ac.uk/transport/documents/transport_sustainability.pdf

  • University of Liverpool John Moores. (2014, August). Green Travel Plans. Retrieved December 2, 2014, from http://www.ljmu.ac.uk/Sustainability/Sustainability_docs/LJMU_Green_Travel_Plan_August_2014.pdf

  • University of Warwick. (2007, June). Main Campus Master Plan, Travel Plan and Car Management Strategy. Retrieved December 2, 2015, from http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/about/campusdevelopment/application/6_uow_travel_plan_complete_document.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Panagiotis Papaioannou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Papaioannou, P., Politis, I. (2019). Applying Behavior Change Theory to Predict Travel Behavior of University Commuters. In: Briassoulis, H., Kavroudakis, D., Soulakellis, N. (eds) The Practice of Spatial Analysis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89806-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics