Advertisement

Blake’s ‘Auguries of Innocence’ as/in Radical Animal Politics, c.1800

  • Anne MilneEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature book series (PSAAL)

Abstract

In this chapter, Milne highlights Blake’s engagement with the animal welfare issues of his day by demonstrating how ‘Auguries of Innocence’ not only enacts an inclusive and anti-speciesist dynamic but encourages activism. Milne surveys critical responses that link Blake’s artistry to an anti-cruelty politics and reads ‘Auguries’ alongside animal representations by Anna Laetitia Barbauld, Sarah Trimmer, Helen Maria Williams, and John Thelwall. Milne also examines Blake’s poem through an animal studies theoretical lens showing that Blake goes beyond evoking the ‘sincere sympathy’ for animals so popular in his time. Rather, he promotes the reanimation of the world, activates a sensual recalibration, and achieves what Broglio and Nash call ‘difference without assimiliation’.

References

  1. Amyot, Thomas (ed.). 1812. Speeches in Parliament of the Right Honourable William Windham, to Which Is Prefixed, Some Account of His Life, vol. III. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  2. Baine, Rodney M., and Mary R. Baine. 1986. The Scattered Portions: William Blake’s Biological Symbolism. Athens, GA: Distributed by the Author.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, Karen. 1998. Getting Real: Technoscientific Practices and the Materialization of Reality. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 10 (2): 87–128.Google Scholar
  4. Barbauld, Anna Letitia. 1773. The Mouse’s Petition, Found in the Trap Where He Had Been Confined All Night by Dr. Priestly, for the Sake of Making Experiments with Different Kinds of Air. In Poems, 37–40. London: Joseph Johnson.Google Scholar
  5. Blake, William. 1988. The Complete Poetry and Prose of William Blake, rev. ed., ed. David V. Erdman. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  6. Broglio, Ron, and Richard Nash. 2006. Introduction. Configurations 14 (1–2): 1–7.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, Jacques. [1997] 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am, trans. David Wills. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Erskine, Lord. 1809. The Speech of Lord Erskine, in the House of Peers, on the Second Reading of the Bill for Preventing Malicious and Wanton Cruelty to Animals. Monthly Magazine; or, British Register 27 (6): 556–565.Google Scholar
  10. Fairer, David. 2003. “A Little Sparring about Poetry”: Coleridge and Thelwall, 1796–8. New Series, The Coleridge Bulletin 21 (Spring): 20–33.Google Scholar
  11. Fosso, Kurt. 2014. “Feet of Beasts”: Tracking the Animal in Blake. European Romantic Review 24 (2): 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hogarth, William. [1751] 1973. Four Stages of Cruelty. In Engravings by Hogarth: 101 Prints, ed. Sean Shesgreen. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchings, Kevin. 2002. Imagining Nature: Blake’s Environmental Poetics. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kalof, Linda, and Amy Fitzgerald (eds.). 2007. The Animals Reader: The Essential Classic and Contemporary Writings. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
  15. Langford, Paul. 2000. Englishness Identified: Manners and Characters 1650–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lussier, Mark S. 1996. Blake’s Deep Ecology. Studies in Romanticism 35 (3): 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCalman, Iain. 1991. Introduction. In The Horrors of Slavery and Other Writings by Robert Wedderburn, ed. Iain McCalman, 1–40. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  18. McCarthy, William. 2008. Anna Laetitia Barbauld: Voice of the Enlightenment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Milne, Anne. 2016. The Pollen of Metaphor: Box, Cage, and Trap as Containment in the Eighteenth Century. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 57: 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Paine, Thomas. [1791] 2011. Rights of Man, ed. Claire Grogan. Peterborough: Broadview.Google Scholar
  21. Perkins, David. 2003. Romanticism and Animal Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Punter, David. 1997. Blake: His Shadowy Animals. Studies in Romanticism 36 (2): 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ritvo, Harriet. 1987. The Animal Estate: The English and Other Creatures in the Victorian Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Seuss, Dr. 1954. Horton Hears a Who! New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Shesgreen, Sean (ed.). 1973. Engravings by Hogarth: 101 Prints. Mineola, NY: Dover.Google Scholar
  26. Taylor, Thomas. [1792] 1966. A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes. Gainesville, FL: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints.Google Scholar
  27. Thelwall, John. [1795–1796] 1995. On the Moral and Political Influence of the Prospective Principle of Virtue. In The Politics of English Jacobinism: Writings of John Thelwall, ed. Gregory Claeys, 88–101. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Thelwall, John. [1793] 2001. The Peripatetic, ed. Judith Thompson. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Thomas, Keith. 1983. Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England, 1500–1800. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  30. Thompson, Judith. 2001. Introduction. In The Peripatetic, ed. Judith Thompson, 11–50. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Thompson, Judith. 2012. John Thelwall in the Wordsworth Circle: The Silenced Partner. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trimmer, Sarah. 1781. An Easy Introduction to the Knowledge of Nature, and Reading the Holy Scriptures. Adapted to the Capacities of Children, 2nd ed. London: J. Dodsley, T. Longman, G. Robinson, and J. Johnson.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, Helen Maria. 1823. Poems on Various Subjects: With Introductory Remarks on the Present State of Science and Literature in France. London: G. & W. B. Whittaker.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Toronto ScarboroughTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations