Abstract
People raise pigs in concentrated-animals-feeding operations (CAFOs). On surface, people’s dominance appears to be absolute and complete. But the dominance comes at the cost of declines in people’s health and longevity and fertility. I show that there is justice coming out of CAFOs after all.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akhtar, Aysha. Animals and Public Health: Why Treating Animals Better Is Critical to Human Welfare. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Blackorby, Charles, and David Donaldson. “Pigs and Guinea Pigs: A Note on the Ethics of Animal Exploitation.” Economic Journal, November 1992, pp. 1345–1369.
Clarke, Matthew, and Yew-Kwang Ng. “Population Dynamics and Animal Welfare: Issues Raised by the Culling of Kangaroos in Puckapunyal.” Social Choice Welfare, 27, 2006, pp. 407–422.
Imhoff, Daniel, ed. CAFO: The Tragedy of Industrial Animal Factories. Foundation for Deep Ecology, Sausalito, CA, in collaboration with Earth Aware, San Rafael, CA, 2010.
Serpell, James. In the Company of Animals: A Study of Human–Animal Relationships, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
A Formal Model of the Community of Pigs and People
What will happen in this community of pigs and people over time? Will their populations grow steadily? Or will they become extinct? It is impossible to tell from Fig. 1. So let’s look at a special case instead. Let the letter Q stand for pigs, and the letter Y for people, and t for time:
- Q :
-
pigs
- Y :
-
people
- t :
-
time
The community of people and pigs is described by two equations of motion:
The a’s and the b’s correspond to the arrows in Fig. 1:
arrow 1 = a1 rate of natural growth of people
arrow 2 = a2 rate of death caused by diet with pork
arrow 3 = b1 rate of growth in demand for pork
arrow 4 = b2 rate of death of pigs due to pathogens
This community will become stable eventually, with populations equal to:
Note that the pig population always moves in lock steps with the people population whenever their environment is perturbed. Divide Q by Y and get:
This ratio—the number of pigs per person—measures the pork content of people’s diet. This ratio is the key to understanding pigs’ ability to revenge for the cruelty of CAFOs.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, L.W. (2018). Revenges of the CAFO Pigs. In: Behavioral Economics and Bioethics. Palgrave Advances in Behavioral Economics. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89779-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89779-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89778-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89779-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)