Skip to main content

Generating Ethics and Social Justice in Applied Theatre Curricula

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Directions in Teaching Theatre Arts
  • 308 Accesses

Abstract

Ethics are a set of principles and guidelines to help individuals make choices in order to avoid doing harm while working with others. Most professions have developed codes of ethics for their practitioners to follow in relation to their clients; however, a code of ethics for applied theatre has not yet been agreed upon by the field at large. This chapter presents a potential code of ethics for applied theatre based on the following factors: Boundaries, Competence, Participants’ Rights, Research, and Justice and Advocacy.

Having a code of ethics is not enough, unless practitioners know how to use it. A strong understanding of ethical guidelines strengthens future practitioners’ abilities to reflect on their work, provides clear ground rules and boundaries to follow in complex and volatile situations, and brings a clear-eyed responsibility to practice. Students of applied theatre need to leave school as effective, skilled, ethical practitioners in order to grow the field responsibly. A designated course in applied theatre ethics is the only way to assure that ethics get covered in enough depth to be fully understood; a piecemeal, class-by-class approach will be incomplete. The second half of this chapter provides examples of how to teach ethical concepts through embodied exercises and how to practice dealing with ethical dilemmas through the models of applied theatre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For further information see Ackroyd 2000, 2007; Banks 2011; Bishop 2014; Bowles and Nadon 2013; Fisher 2006; Hamel 2013; Kerr 2009; Landy and Montgomery 2012; McCammons 2002; Prendergast and Saxton 2009; Shaughnessy 2005; Snyder-Young 2013; Taylor 2003.

  2. 2.

    Brandeis University, Brock University, Cal Poly Pomona, City University of New York, The New School for Liberal Arts/Eugene Lang College, Goldsmith’s University of London, Mount Gravatt/Griffith University, Lesley University, New York University, Royal Central School of Speech and Drama/University of London, University of New England, University of San Francisco, University of Texas at Austin, and University of Victoria. Websites were studied because they are the public platform used to attract students to theatre programs.

  3. 3.

    Circle Theatre, North American Drama Therapy Association, National Association of Social Work, American Counseling Association, American Psychological Association.

  4. 4.

    Ackroyd 2000; Fisher 2006; Hamel 2013; Kandil 2016; Kerr 2009; McCammons 2002; Prendergast and Saxton 2009; Shaughnessy 2005; Snyder-Young 2013; Taylor 2003; White 2006.

  5. 5.

    A Spectactor is an audience member in a Forum Theatre performance who joins in a scene onstage to demonstrate one possible way to re-enact a scene and improve the situation. A Teller is an audience member in a Playback Theatre performance who tells a story that the Playback actors will act out or “play back” for him/her.

  6. 6.

    An IRB, IEC, ERB, or REB is usually associated with an academic, government-funded, or private research institution. The researcher must fill out an application that outlines the purposes of the research, who the participants will be, what methods will be used, and what possible benefits or harms the participants might face from being in the study.

  7. 7.

    www.hhs.gov/ohrp/international/, 2017.

  8. 8.

    Ethical note for the instructor: Make sure that the person playing the Identified Therapy Spectactor has not previously had a dating violence trauma to avoid creating an actual ethical dilemma in your classroom.

  9. 9.

    When students become more practiced, they will be able to stop the scene when they see a red flag that could potentially lead to an ethical dilemma, rather than wait for the dilemma to happen.

References

  • Ackroyd, Judith. 2000. Applied Theatre: Problems and Possibilities. Applied Theatre Research 1. http://www.griffith.edu.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0004/81796/Ackroyd.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2017.

  • ———. 2007. Applied Theatre: An Exclusionary Discourse? Applied Theatre Research 8. http://griffith.edu.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0005/52889/01-ackroyd-final.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2017.

  • American Counseling Association. Ethics and Professional Standards. http://socialworkers.org/pubs/code/default.asp. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.

  • American Psychological Association. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.

  • Bailey, Sally, and Paige Dickinson. 2016. The Importance of Safely De-roling. Methods: A Journal of Acting Pedagogy (2): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, Daniel. 2011. The Question of Cultural Diplomacy: Acting Ethically. Theatre Topics 21 (2): 109–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Kathy. 2014. Six Perspectives in Search of an Ethical Solution: Utilising a Moral Imperative with a Multiple Ethics Paradigm to Guide Research-based Theatre/Applied Theatre. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 19 (2): 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blass, Thomas. 2004. The Man Who Shocked the World: The Life and Legacy of Stanley Milgram, Creator of the Obedience Experiments and the Father of Six Degrees. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, Augusto. 1979. The Theatre of the Oppressed. New York: Urizen Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. The Rainbow of Desire: The Boal Method of Theatre and Therapy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. Legislative Theatre. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Norma, and Daniel-Raymond Nadon. 2013. Staging Social Justice: Collaborating to Create Activist Theatre. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne Dieckman, Suzanne. 1991. A Crucible for Actors: Questions of Directorial Ethics. Theatre Topics 1 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne, Suzanne, Karen Poulin, and Ashley Rearden. 1999. The Impact of Acting on Student Actors: Boundary Blurring, Growth, and Emotional Distress. Theatre Topics 9 (2): 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattorini, Paolo M. 2014, Summer. Clinical Ethics as Applied Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetic Education 48 (2): 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/jae/2014.0010. Accessed 12 May 2014.

  • DoliĹ„ski, Dariusz, Tomasz Grzyb, MichaĹ‚ Folwarczny, Patrycja GrzybaĹ‚a, Karolina Krzyszycha, Karolina Martynowska, and Jakub Trojanowski. 2017. Would You Deliver an Electric Shock in 2015? Obedience in the Experimental Paradigm Developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 Years Following the Original Studies. Social Psychology and Personality Science, January 1. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550617693060. Accessed 16 Mar 2017.

  • Feldhendler, Daniel. 1994. Augusto Boal and Jacob L. Moreno: Theatre and Therapy. In Playing Boal: Theatre, Therapy, Activism, ed. Mady Schutzman and Jan Cohen-Cruz, 87–109. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, Amanda Stuart. 2006. Developing an Ethics of Practice in Applied Theatre: Badiou and Fidelity to the Truth of the Event. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 10 (2): 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569780500103992. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.

  • Hamel, Sonia. 2013. When Theatre of the Oppressed Becomes Theatre of the Oppressor. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance 18 (4): 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2013.836918. Accessed 27 Oct 2015.

  • Kandil, Yasmine. 2016. Personal Stories in Applied Theatre Contexts: Redefining the Blurred Lines. Research in Drama Education 21 (2): 201–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, David. 2009. Ethics of Applied Theatre. South African Theatre Journal 23: 177–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landy, Robert J., and David T. Montgomery. 2012. Theatre for Change: Education, Social Action and Therapy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCammons, Laura. 2002. Ethical Issues in Drama/Theatre Education Research and Practice. Applied Theatre Researcher 5. http://www.griffith.edu.au/centre/cpci/atr/journal/volume5_article6.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2008.

  • National Association of Social Workers. Code of Ethics. http://socialworkers.org/pubs/code/default.asp. Accessed 5 Apr 2017.

  • North American Drama Therapy Association. 2017. Code of Ethical Principles. http://www.nadta.org/assets/documents/2015code-of-ethics.pdf. Accessed 25 Mar 2017.

  • Prendergast, Monica, and Juliana Saxton, eds. 2009. Applied Theatre: International Case Studies and Challenges for Practice. Chicago: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rule, Janice. 1973. The Actor’s Identity Crises (Postanalytic Reflections of an Actress). International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy 2 (1): 51–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salas, Jo. 1993. Improvising Real Life: Personal Story in Playback Theatre. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaughnessy, Nicola. 2005. Truths and Lies: Exploring the Ethics of Performance Applications. Research in Drama Education 10 (2): 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder-Young, Dani. 2013. Theatre of Good Intentions: Challenges and Hopes for Theatre and Social Change. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Philip. 2003. Applied Theatre: Creating Transformative Encounters in the Community. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Human Research Protection. 2017. International. www.hhs.gov/ohrp/international/. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.

  • White, Gareth. 2006. Navigating the Ethics of Audience Participation. Applied Theatre Research 7. http://www.griffith.edu.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0004/52915/white.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally Bailey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: An Applied Theatre Code of Ethics

Appendix: An Applied Theatre Code of Ethics

  1. 1.

    The Principle of Boundaries – For the Applied Theatre Practitioner boundaries refers to staying true to the models of applied theatre while keeping the safety of participants in mind.

    1. a.

      Scope of Practice – An Applied Theatre Practitioner uses Applied Theatre for exploring social justice issues with a community of participants and does not engage in pure theatre entertainment, on one hand, or therapeutic intervention, on another.

    2. b.

      De-roling – An Applied Theatre Practitioner ensures the safety of community participants by providing a de-roling exercise when the participant finishes performing a role in a performance, training, or workshop.

  2. 2.

    Competence and Professional Development – Applied Theatre Practitioners facilitate exploration into social justice issues through the models in which they have been trained.

    1. a.

      Competence of Knowledge and Skills – The Applied Theatre Practitioner will have a base knowledge of applied theatre theories and models, directing, playwriting, and theatre pedagogy, and will be able to demonstrate skills in improvisation , directing, playwriting, teaching, and facilitation.

    2. b.

      Cultural Competence – Applied Theatre Practitioners understand the communities and systems from which their audiences derive; acknowledge, accept, and address privilege (to include white privilege, economic, ablest, etc.); and cultivate cultural humility.

    3. c.

      Professional Development – An Applied Theatre Practitioner engages in continued educational opportunities and seeks supervision to hone knowledge and skills.

  3. 3.

    Participants’ Rights – An Applied Theatre Practitioner protects and safeguards the dignity and rights of participants.

    1. a.

      Confidentiality – An Applied Theatre Practitioner makes clear the limits of confidentiality to participants of an applied theatre performance or workshop.

    2. b.

      Laws and Regulations – Applied Theatre Practitioners understand federal laws pertaining to confidentiality, such as FERPA and HIPPA, and facility specific regulations, such as in military installations or prisons.

    3. c.

      Informed Consent – An Applied Theatre Practitioner obtains informed consent from audience members. This needs to include the limits of confidentiality, what is going to happen and how it will be done, risks and benefits of participating, the possibility of experiencing emotion or catharsis while playing a role, and the right to say no to participating at any time.

  4. 4.

    Research – The Applied Theatre Practitioner who conducts research adheres to the laws and regulations governing the conduct of research, following all criteria and processes established by the Institutional Review Board of the organization or institution in which they conduct research. In the absence of an Institutional Review Board, an Applied Theatre Practitioner seeks the ethical advice of qualified professionals not directly involved in the investigation to determine the extent to which research participants may be compromised.

  5. 5.

    Justice and Advocacy – Applied Theatre Practitioner is dedicated to making Justice and Advocacy the focus of the Applied Theatre work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bailey, S., Dickinson, P. (2018). Generating Ethics and Social Justice in Applied Theatre Curricula. In: Fliotsos, A., Medford, G. (eds) New Directions in Teaching Theatre Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89767-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics