Abstract
This chapter examines earthquakes as a real-world, socioscientific issue to explore how schools, school curricula, school systems, and communities respond to the learning opportunities created by a natural disaster in the local or global community. We identified some of the issues that determine how different countries deal with earthquake preparation, response, and the factors that affect recovery. We then reviewed school-based, curriculum, and community responses to the Canterbury earthquakes in New Zealand as a case study. In the immediate aftermath, attention focused on the emotional support of students, teachers, and families, and efforts were made in combination with the community to return to normal schooling and curriculum stability in students’ lives. We suggest that recovery from such natural disasters must be both flexible and integrated across curriculum and the community, drawing widely on available resources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, D. (2012, August). A tale of three cities and three earthquake disasters. Tafter Journal, No. 50. Retrieved from http://www.tafterjournal.it/2012/08/01/ataleofthreecitiesandthreeearthquakedisasters/
Bateman, A., & Danby, S. (2013). Recovering from the earthquake. Disaster Prevention and Management, 22(5), 467–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-10-2013-0177.
Education Review Office. (2013). Stories of resilience and innovation in schools and early childhood services. Canterbury earthquakes: 2010–2012. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
Finnis, K., Standring, S., Johnston, D., & Ronan, K. (2004). Children’s understanding of natural hazards in Christchurch, New Zealand. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 19(2), 11–20.
Goldfinger, C., Ikeda, Y., Yeats, R. S., & Ren, J. (2013). Superquakes and supercycles. Seismological Research Letters, 84(1), 24–32.
Japan Meteorological Association (JMA). (2013, October). Lessons learned from the tsunami disaster caused by the 2011 great East Japan earthquake and improvements in JMA’s tsunami warning system. Retrieved from http://www.data.jma.go.jp/svd/eqev/data/en/tsunami/LessonsLearned_Improvements_brochure.pdf
Johnson, V. A., & Ronan, K. R. (2014). Classroom responses of New Zealand school teachers following the 2011 Christchurch earthquake. Natural Hazards, 72(2), 1075–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1053-3.
Johnston, A. (2012, October 22). L’Aquila quake: Italy scientists guilty of manslaughter. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-20025626
Johnston, D., Ronan, K., & Standring, S. (2014). Children’s understanding of natural hazards in Christchurch: Reflecting on a 2003 study. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 29(1), 66.
Ministry of Civil Defence & Emergency Management (MCDEM). (2012). Report of the 2012 “What’s the Plan Stan?” survey of New Zealand primary schools. Auckland, New Zealand: Author.
Murakami, S. (2014, March). How broadcasters used the Internet: Simulcasting at the time of the Great East Japan earthquake. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(3), 51–55.
Mutch, C. (2014). The role of schools in disaster preparedness, response and recovery: What can we learn from the literature? Pastoral Care in Education: An International Journal of Personal, Social and Emotional Development, 32(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2014.880123.
Mutch, C., & Marlowe, J. (2013). Lessons from disaster: the power and place of story. Disaster Prevention and Management, 22(5), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-10-2013-0172.
National Child Traumatic Stress Network (NCTSN). (n.d.). Teacher guidelines for helping students after an earthquake. Retrieved from http://www.nctsn.org/sites/default/files/assets/pdfs/Teachers_Talk_to_Students_about_Earthquake.pdf
Nielsen, J. A. (2013). Delusions about evidence: On why scientific evidence should not be the main concern in socioscientific decision making. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(4), 373–385.
NZ Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
NZ Ministry of Education. (2009). EOTC guidelines: Bringing the curriculum alive. Wellington, New Zealand: Author.
O’Connor, P. (2013). Pedagogy of love and care: Shaken schools respond. Disaster Prevention and Management, 22(5), 425–433.
Ormandy, S. (2014). Wellbeing and the curriculum: One school’s story post-earthquake. Teachers and Curriculum, 14, 3–11.
Poudel, K. (2014, January 14). Kathmandu Valley quake: Real risk. New Spotlight News Magazine, 7(14). Retrieved http://www.spotlightnepal.com/News/Article/KATHMANDU-VALLEY-QUAKE-Real-Risk
Poudel, K. (2015, May 21). Deadly Gorkha earth quake boon in disguise. New Spotlight News Magazine, 8(21). Retrieved http://www.spotlightnepal.com/News/Article/Earthquake-Nepal-Devastation-Keshab-Poudel
Rennie, L., Venville, G., & Wallace, J. (2012). Knowledge that counts in a global community: Exploring the contribution of integrated curriculum. London, UK: Routledge.
Rennie, L. J. (2011). Blurring the boundary between the classroom and the community: Challenges for teachers’ professional learning. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 13–29). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Schwarz, E., & Stolow, D. (2006). Twenty-first century learning in afterschool. New Directions for Youth Development, 2006(110), 81–99.
Simpson, P. (2014). Learning from the Christchurch earthquakes. Teacher support material for “Learning from the Christchurch Earthquakes”. Connected, Level 4. Retrieved from www.connected.tki.org.nz
Squires, N. (2014, November 10). Italian scientists cleared of failing to predict L’Aquila earthquake. Telegraph Media Group. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/11221825/Italian-scientists-cleared-of-failing-to-predict-LAquila-earthquake.html
Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46, 1–44.
Taylor, M., & Moeed, A. (2013a). The 2010 Canterbury earthquake: Curriculum shockwaves. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 22(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2012.759693.
Taylor, M., & Moeed, A. (2013b). Curriculum shockwaves? Geography, science, and the Canterbury earthquakes. Curriculum Matters, 9, 8–28.
Tylack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The grammar of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31(3), 453–480.
UN News Centre. (2015a, June 5). Nepal’s heritage sites on shaky ground after devastating quake. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=51065#.VXunlPnvPIU
UN News Centre. (2015b, June 9). Ban welcomes ‘milestone’ agreement on new Nepal constitution. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=51102#.VXumm_nvPIU
Vervaeck, A., & Daniell, J. (2011, April 22). 2 examples of how technology made the difference during the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami. Retrieved from http://earthquake-report.com/2011/04/22/2-examples-of-how-technology-made-the-difference-during-the-tohoku-earthquake-and-tsunami/
World Health Organization (WHO). (2015, May 13). Emergency preparedness pays off as Kathmandu hospitals respond to earthquakes. News release. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/nepal-second-quake/en/
Yamasaki, E. (2012). What we can learn from Japan’s earthquake early warning system. Momentum, 1(1), Article 2. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=momentum
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rennie, L., Wallace, J., Venville, G. (2018). Natural Disasters as Unique Socioscientific Events: Curricular Responses to the New Zealand Earthquakes. In: Corrigan, D., Buntting, C., Jones, A., Loughran, J. (eds) Navigating the Changing Landscape of Formal and Informal Science Learning Opportunities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89761-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89761-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89760-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89761-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)