Advertisement

Vipassana Meditation as an Introspective Theatre: CAT by Ansuman Biswas

  • Silvia BattistaEmail author
Chapter
  • 152 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter looks at the work CAT staged by Ansuman Biswas at the South London Gallery in 1998. The piece consisted of a performance/experiment/demonstration of the famous quantum physics image/paradox of Schrödinger’s cat employing, as a means of investigation, the 2500-year-old Indian technology of Vipassana meditation. The performance space consisted of a soundproof black box placed in the middle of the gallery space where Biswas lived for ten days and nights engaging in Vipassana meditation. The multiple spatial potentialities of this restricted place are interrogated in this chapter by looking at the following cultural references: the spatial and symbolic locations of the hermit and the anchorite; the Schrödinger’s cat thought experiment; and the theatrical space. Eventually, the analysis of Vipassana meditation as performance action, enquires into its modalities of operation in respect to spirituality, performativity, spectatorship and embodiment. The hypothesis proposed is that of an introspective theatre informed by the condition of spectatorship that Vipassana generates.

References

  1. Allain, Paul, and Jen Harvie. 2009. The Routledge Companion to Theatre and Performance. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2008a. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” In Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman, 801–832. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2008b. “Living in a Posthumanist Material World, Lessons from Schrödinger’s Cat.” In Bits of Life: Feminism at the Intersections of Media, Bioscience and Technology, edited by Annette Smellick and Nina Lykke, 165–176. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bhabha, Homi. 1996. “Aura and Agora: On Negotiating Rapture and Speaking Between.” In Negotiating Rapture, The Power of Art to Transform Lives, edited by Richard Francis, 8–17. Chicago: Museum of Contemporary Art.Google Scholar
  6. Biswas, Ansuman. 1998. CAT. London: South London Gallery.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2010. “Interviewed by Silvia Battista.”Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2013. “Interviewed by Silvia Battista.”Google Scholar
  9. Carvalho, António. 2010. “Self, Performativity and Vipassana Meditation: Some Theoretical Considerations.” e-cadernos CES 8: 7–32.Google Scholar
  10. Chamberlain, Franc. 2009. “Playing with Post-secular Performance: Julia Lee Barclay, Ansuman Biswas, Traci Kelly, and Kira O’Reilly in Conversation with Franc Chamberlain.” Journal of Performance and Art 91: 54–67.Google Scholar
  11. Coelsch-Foisner, Sabine. 2002. Revolution in Poetic Consciousness: An Existentialist Reading of Mid-Twentieth-Century British Women’s Poetry, vol. 2. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Crohn Schmitt, Natalie. 1990. Actors and Onlookers: Theatre and Twentieth-Century Scientific Views of Nature. Evaston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dalton, Drew M. 2009. Longing for the Other: Levinas and Metaphysical Desire. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, Carmel Bendon. 2008. Mysticism & Space: Space and Spatiality in the Works of Richard Rolle. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2008. The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Fleischman, Forrest. 1999. Karma and Chaos: New and Collected Essays on Vipassana Meditation. Seattle: Vipassana Research Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Flood, Gavin. 2004. The Ascetic Self: Subjectivity, Memory and Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Furse, Anna. 2011. “Being Touched.” In A Life of Ethics and Performance, edited by Matthews John and David Torevell. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Gamwell, Lynn. 2004. Exploring the Invisible: Art, Science and the Spiritual. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. George, David E. R. 1989a. “On Ambiguity: Toward a Post-modern Performance Theory.” Theatre Research International 14, No. 1: 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 1989b. “Quantum Theatre—Potential Theatre: A New Paradigm?” New Theatre Quartely 5, No. 18: 171–179.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1999. Buddhism as/in Performance: Analysis of Meditation and Theatrical Practice. New Delhi: D.K. Printworld.Google Scholar
  23. Hart, William. 1987. The Art of Living: Vipassana Meditation as Taught by S.N. Goenka. New York: HarperCollins. Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledge: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 4, No. 3: 575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Irigaray, Luce. 2002. Between East and West: From Singularity to Community. Chichester: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jasper, David. 2004. The Sacred Desert: Religion, Literature, Art, and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johncock, Will. 2011. “The Experimental Flesh: Incarnation in Terms of Quantum Measurement and Phenomenological Perception.” Phenomenology & Practice 5, No. 1: 140–154.Google Scholar
  28. Klemm, David. 2004. “Foreword.” In The Sacred Desert: Religion, Literature, Art, and Culture, edited by David Jasper, xi–xv. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Krauss, Rosalind. 1979. “Sculpture in the Expanded Field.” October 8: 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McAvoy, Liz Herbert. 2008. Rhetoric of the Anchorhold: Space, Place and Body within the Discourses of Enclosure. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  31. ———. 2011. Medieval Anchoritisms: Gender, Space and the Solitary Life. Woodbridge: Boydell & Brewer.Google Scholar
  32. McEvoy, J. P., and Oscar Zarate. 2007. Introducing Quantum Theory. Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  33. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1997. The Visible and the Invisible. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Otto, Rudolf. 1958. The Idea of the Holy: An Inquiry into the Non-rational Factor in the Idea of the Divine and its Relation to the Rational. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Ouzman, Sven. 2011. “Seeing Is Deceiving: Rock Art and the Non-visual.” World Archeology 33, No. 2 (October): 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Oztürk, Maya Nanitchkova. 2010. “An Uncanny Site/Side: On Exposure, Dark Space, and Structures of Fear in the Context of Performance.” Contemporary Theatre Review 20, No. 3: 296–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pagis, Michal. 2009. “Embodied Self-reflectivity.” Social Psychology Quarterly 72, No. 3: 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Savage, Anne. 2008. “From Anchorhold to Cell of Self-Knowledge: Points Along a History of the Human Body.” In Rhetoric of the Anchorhold: Space, Place and Body within the Discourses of Enclosure, edited by Liz Herbert McAvoy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
  39. Schmidt, Lawrence K. 2006. Understanding Hermeneutics. Stocksfield: Acuman Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Schrödinger, Erwin. 1983. “The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrödinger’s ‘Cat Paradox’ Paper.” In Quantum Theories and Measurement, edited by John Archibald Wheeler and Wojciech Hubert Zurek. Translated by John D. Trimmer. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Schwarte, Ludger. 2007. “Intuition and Imagination: How to See Something that Is Not There.” In Dynamics and Performativity of Imagination: The Image between the Visible and the Invisible, edited by Huppauf Bernd and Christoph Wulf, 65–79. Albington: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Smart, Ninian. 1971. The Religious Experience of Mankind. New York: The Fontana Library Theology and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  43. ———. 1993. The World’s Religion: Old Traditions and Modern Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Soma, Thera, trans. 1999. “Satipatthana Sutta: The Discourse on the Arousing of Mindfulness.” http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/mn/mn.010.soma.html.
  45. The Arts Catalyst. 1998. Press Release: Parallel Universe. London: South London Gallery.Google Scholar
  46. Turner, Victor. 1967. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Turner, Victor, and Edward M. Bruner. 1986. The Anthropology of Experience. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  48. Van Gorkom, Nina. 2008. The Buddhist Teaching on Physical Phenomena. London: Zolag.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2011. Introduction to Abhidamma. San Francisco: Zolag.Google Scholar
  50. Warr, Tracey. “The Informe Body.” http://people.brunel.ac.uk/bst/1no1/TRACEywarr.html.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Drama, Dance and Performance StudiesLiverpool Hope UniversityLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations