Abstract
This chapter explores three main risks. First, it addresses the threat of secular stagnation in developed countries where slower growth reinforces the consequences of rising debt leverage. It discusses to what extent this threat affects country risk assessment. Second, it presents an analysis of monetary policy-related systemic risk in the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and in the Euro-zone region through the challenge of OECD’s central banks to maintain low-interest rate and boosting long-term growth. Third, it discusses the specific case of the Eurozone and the macroeconomic constraints of the Maastricht Treaty. The chapter also includes two case studies—the root causes of the crisis in Greece, Ireland, Portugal, and Spain (so-called PIGS), and common risk factors arising out of the Global Financial Crisis.
The manner in which things exist and take place constitutes what is called the nature of things, and a careful observation of the nature of things is the sole foundation of all truth.
Jean Baptiste Say. A Treatise On Political Economy (1832).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alessandri, P., and A.G. Haldane. 2011. Banking on the state. In The International Financial Crisis: Have the Rules of Finance Changed? vol. 14, edited by A. Demirgüç-Kunt, D. Evanoff, and G. Kaufman. World Scientific Studies in International Economics, University of Chicago.
Artus, Patrick, and Marie-Paule Virard. 2016. La Folie des Banques Centrales: Pourquoi la Prochaine Crise Sera Pire. Paris: Fayard.
Bouchet, Michel Henry, and Robert Isaak. 2015. “From Hyperfinance to Secular Stagnation and Mass Unemployment: Analyzing the Impact of Shrinking Bank Lending on SMEs in the Aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis.” The World Financial Review, December.
Brunnermeier, Markus K., and Isabel Schnabel. 2016. Bubbles and Central Banks. Historical Perspectives. Central Banks at a Crossroads: What Can We Learn from History? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Castellani, Davide, Piva Mariacristina, Schubert Torben, and Vivarelli Marco. 2015. “R&D and Productivity: The US/EU Productivity Gap Before and After the Crisis.” http://dipartimenti.unicatt.it/dises-Innovation_Vivarelli_151113.pdf.
Credit Suisse. 2015. Quantitative Easing Improves Prospects for the Eurozone.
Dew-Becker, Ian, and Robert J. Gordon. 2008. “The Role of Labor Market Changes in the Slowdown of European Productivity Growth.” NBER Working Paper 13840.
Easterly, William, and Ross Levine. 2001. “It’s Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models.” The World Bank Economic Review 15 (2): 177–219.
Eggertsson, Gauti. 2006. “The Deflation Bias and Committing to Being Irresponsible.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 38 (2): 283–321.
Eggertsson, Gauti. 2011. “What Fiscal Policy Is Effective at Zero Interest Rates?” In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2010, Volume 25, edited by Daron Acemoglu and Michael Woodford, 59–112. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Eggertsson, Gauti B. 2017. “Macroeconomic Policy in a Liquidity Trap.” NBER Reporter 2017 Number 1: Research Summary.
Eggertsson, Gauti, and Paul Krugman. 2012. “Debt, Deleveraging, and the Liquidity Trap: A Fisher-Minsky-Koo Approach.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 1469–1513.
European Commission. 2017. “The European Semester: Why and How.” https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economic-and-fiscal-policy-coordination/eu-economic-governance-monitoring-prevention-correction/european-semester/framework/european-semester-why-and-how_en.
Eurostat. 2016. “Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure Scoreboard: A Broad Set of Indicators for Early Detection of Macroeconomic Imbalances.” News Release 226/2016, November 16, 2016.
Gordon, Robert J. 2014. “The Turtle’s Progress: Secular Stagnation Meets the Headwinds.” VOX CEPR’s Policy Portal, August 15.
High-Level Group. 2004. “Facing the Challenge: The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment.” Report from The High-Level Group Chaired by Wim Kok. European Community, November.
Hudecz, Gergely. 2017. “Secular Stagnation: What the Debate Is About?” Society and Economy 39 (1): 125–140.
Joyce, Michael A., Anna Lasaosa, Ibrahim Stevens, and Matthew Tong. 2011. “The Financial Market Impact of Quantitative Easing.” International Journal of Central Banking 7 (3): 113–161.
Krugman, Paul. 2014a. “Four Observations on Secular Stagnation.” In Secular Stagnation: Facts, Causes, and Cures, edited by Coen Teulings and Richard Baldwin. London: CEPR Press.
Krugman, Paul. 2014b. “What Secular Stagnation Isn’t.” The New York Times, October 27.
Maxfield, John. 2015. “Twenty-Five Major Factors That Caused or Contributed to the Financial Crisis.” The Motley Fool, February 28.
Micossi, Stefano. 2011. “The New Economic Governance of Europe After the Crisis.” Luiss School of Government, Rome, Italy, May 23.
Micossi, Stefano. 2016. “Thirty Years of the Single European Market.” 15th European Economy Lecture. Bruges, Belgium, October 19.
Reinhart, Carmen, and Kenneth Rogoff. 2009. This Time Is Different. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rogers, John H., Chiara Scotti, and Jonathan H. Wright. 2014. “Evaluating Asset Markets Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policy: A Cross-Country Comparison.” International Finance Discussion Papers Number 1101, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Rose, Andrew K., and Mark M. Spiegel. 2009. “Cross-Country Causes and Consequences of the 2008 Crisis: Early Warning.” NBER Working Paper No. 15357.
Sempledec, Kirk. 2017. “In a Venezuela Ravaged by Inflation, a Race for Survival.” The New York Times, December 2.
SKEMA Business School. 2017. “Globalization Seminars.” Michel Henry Bouchet. www.developingfinance.org.
Summers, Larry. 2016. “The Age of Secular Stagnation: What It Is and What to Do About It.” Foreign Affairs, March/April.
US Federal Reserve. 2018. “Recent Balance Sheet Trends.” https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/bst_recenttrends.htm.
Van Ark, Bart, Mary O’Mahoney, and Marcel P. Timmer. 2008. “The Productivity Gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and Causes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 22 (1): 25–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 11.1 The Maastricht Treaty ’s Convergence Criteria in the Euro-Zone
Appendix 11.1 The Maastricht Treaty ’s Convergence Criteria in the Euro-Zone
-
Inflation rates: No more than 1.5% higher than the average of the three best performing (lowest inflation) EU member states.
-
Annual government deficit : The ratio of the annual government deficit to the gross domestic product (GDP) must not exceed 3% at the end of the preceding fiscal year. If not, it is at least required to reach a level close to 3%. Only exceptional and temporary excesses can be granted for exceptional cases.
-
The ratio of gross government debt to GDP must not exceed 60% at the end of the preceding fiscal year. Even if this target cannot be achieved due to specific conditions, the ratio must have sufficiently diminished and must be approaching the reference value at a satisfactory pace. As of mid-2018, of the countries in the Eurozone, only Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovakia, Luxembourg, Netherlands, and Malta still met this target.
-
Exchange rate: Applicant countries should have joined the exchange-rate mechanism (ERM II) under the European Monetary System (EMS) for two consecutive years and should not have devalued their currency during that period.
-
Long-term interest rates : The nominal long-term interest rate must not be more than 2 percentage points higher than in the three lowest inflation member states.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouchet, M.H., Fishkin, C.A., Goguel, A. (2018). Why Emerging Markets Do Not Hold a Monopoly on Country Risk in the Twenty-First Century: An Analysis of Monetary and Systemic Risks in the OECD and in the Euro-Zone. In: Managing Country Risk in an Age of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89752-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89752-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89751-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89752-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)