Skip to main content

The Root Causes and Consequences of Political Risk: From Bad Governance to Wealth and Political Power Concentration and Social Instability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Country Risk in an Age of Globalization

Abstract

This chapter addresses the root causes of sociopolitical instability. It explores the theme that economic growth must be coupled with socio-institutional flexibility to stem the tensions that arise from unequal income distribution and large wealth gaps both within and between countries. The chapter further analyses the close correlation between corruption and unfavorable business conditions, as well as between corruption and income inequality. It concludes by identifying the various measures of political risks and by the need for risk analysts to look at the power structure of countries to identify the root causes of potential social upheaval. Ratings and rankings can never be substitutes to in-depth analysis backed by a wide range of information sources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abed, George, and Sanjeev Gupta (eds.). 2002. Governance, Corruption, & Economic Performance. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, Daron, Suresh Naidu, Pascual Restrepo, and James Robinson. 2015. “Democracy Does Cause Growth.” NBER Working Paper No. 20004, March 2014. Revised May 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • African Development Bank. 1998. Annual Report: Governance and Economic Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelet, Michele. 2007. “Promoting Growth and Social Progress. Interview: McKinsey Quarterly Special Edition.” http://e-lecciones.net/archivos/loultimo/Bachalet.pdf.

  • Barton, Dominic. 2011. “Capitalism for the Long-Term.” Harvard Business Review, March 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchet, Michel Henry. 2010. “Economie de la Connaissance et Hyperfinance: De la Globalisation des Crises Aujourd’hui à la Régulation Globale Demain?” In Management de l’Economie de la Connaissance, edited by Ludovic Dibiaggio and Pierre-Xavier Meschi. Paris: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchet, Michel Henry. 2010–2018. “Country Risk Seminars and Country Risk MOOC.” Skema Business School. http://www.developingfinance.org.

  • CBonds. 2009. “Republic of Tunisia Foreign Currency Rating Affirmed At ‘BBB’; Local Currency Rating Lowered to ‘A−’; Outlooks Stable,” April 6. http://cbonds.com/news/item/428938.

  • CIA. 2017. World FactBook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/.

  • Coplin, William, and Michael O’Leary. 1972. Everyman’s Prince: A Guide to Understanding Your Political Problems. London: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, Francis. 2000. “Social Capital and Civil Society.” IMF Working Paper WP/00/74, IMF Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, Edward L., Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez de Silanes and Andrei Shleifer. 2004. “Do Institutions Cause Growth?” NBER Working Paper No. 10568, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF. 2010. Tunisia: 2010 Article IV Consultation: Staff Report; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Tunisia, September 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Nathan. 2008. “Political Risk, Democratic Institutions, and Foreign Direct Investment.” Journal of Politics 70 (4): 1040–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, Daniel, Art Kraay, and Pablo Zoido-Lobatao. 2000. “Governance Matters: From Measurement to Action.” Finance & Development 37 (2): 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Anne. 1993. “Virtuous and Vicious Circles in Economic Development.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 83: 351–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez de Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2008. “The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (2): 285–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middle East Online. 2008. “IMF Hails Tunisian Economic Policies.” http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=28865.

  • Muller, Edward, and Mitchell A. Seligson. 1987. “Inequality and Insurgency.” American Political Science Review 81 (2): 425–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2016. Income Inequality Remains High in the Face of Weak Recovery. Center for Opportunity and Equality, November, Paris: OECD Press. https://www.oecd.org/social/OECD2016-Income-Inequality-Update.pdf.

  • Ostry, Jonathan D., Prakash Loungani, and Davide Furceri. 2016. Neoliberalism: Oversold?” Finance and Development 53 (2): 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman. 2016. “Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States”. Washignton Center for Equitable Growth Working Paper, December 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, James. 2006. “Economic Development and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 503–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi. 2004. “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Growth 9 (November): 131–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, Jay, and Ryann Nunn. 2017. “Why Wages Aren’t Growing in America.” Harvard Business Review, October 24, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shambaugh, Jay, Ryann Nunn, Patrick Liu, and Greg Nantz. 2017. Thirteen Facts About Wage Growth. Figure B. Page iii. Economic Facts. The Hamilton Project. The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard & Poor’s. 2004. Sovereign Credit Ratings: A Primer, March 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, Larry. 2000. Statement of Secretary of Treasury Lawrence H. Summers at the Development Committee of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Prague, Czech Republic, September 25. https://www.imf.org/external/am/2000/dc/eng/usa.htm.

  • Teulings, Coen. 2012. “Fiscal Consolidation and Reforms: Substitutes, Not Complements.” VOX-CEPR’s Policy Portal, September 13. http://voxeu.org/article/fiscal-consolidation-and-reforms-substitutes-not-complements.

  • The Telegraph. 2010. “Wen Jiabao Promises Political Reform for China,” October 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijayakumar, Jayaraman, Abdul A. Rasheed, and Rasul H. Tondkar. 2009. “Foreign Direct Investment and Evaluation of Country Risk: An Empirical Investigation.” Multinational Business Review 17 (3): 184–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, John. 1990. “Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened?” Washignton, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, John. 2004. “The Washington Consensus as Policy Prescription for Development.” Speech Delivered at the World Bank, January 13. https://piie.com/publications/papers/williamson0204.pdf.

  • World Bank. 1989. “Sustainable Growth with Equity: A Long-Term Perspective for Sub-Saharan Africa.” Report No. 8014, Technical Department, Africa Region, August 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2007. “World Governance Indicators.” http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#reports.

  • World Wealth and Income Database. 2017. “World Inequality Report 2018, World Inequality Database.” http://wid.world/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Henry Bouchet .

Appendix 10.2 Concise Survey of Academic Literature Regarding the Relationships Between Country Risk Stability, Institutions, Democracy, and Socioeconomic Development

Appendix 10.2 Concise Survey of Academic Literature Regarding the Relationships Between Country Risk Stability, Institutions, Democracy, and Socioeconomic Development

Author

Topic

Relationships democracy, development, and country risk stability

References

Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James

Why nations fail

Openness of a society, its willingness to permit creative destruction, and the rule of law are decisive for economic development. Countries escape poverty only when they have appropriate economic institutions, especially private property and competition. In consensually strong states, politicians and political elites are weak, and citizens give them a “long leash” in the economy, consenting to high taxes, regulation, and involvement by the state, with the expectation that the politicians in power and the bureaucrats will work for the citizens’ benefits

Crown Publishing Group, NY, 2012

Acemoglu Daron

Johnson, Simon

and James, Robinson

The colonial origins of comparative development

Differences in colonial experience could be a source of differences in institutional development. The feasibility of European settlement stemmed from differences in mortality rates. European colonization has led to institutions that enforced the rule of law and encouraged investment, or to extractive states and social systems that were detrimental to economic progress

NBER, Working Paper series no. 7771, June 2000

Acemoglu, Daron and James, Robinson

The role of institutions in growth and development

Institutions are collective choices that are the outcome of a political process. The economic institutions of a society depend on the nature of political institutions and the distribution of political power in society. The main determinants of differences in prosperity across countries are differences in economic institutions. Success and pitfalls of institutional reforms are keys to solve the problem of development and poverty

Commission on Growth and Development, Working Paper no. 10, The World Bank, 2008

Acemoglu, Daron, Suresh Naidu, Pascual Restrepo, and James Robinson

Democracy does cause growth

Democracy has a significant positive effect on GDP per capita: democratizations increase GDP per capita by about 20% in the long run by encouraging investment, increasing schooling, inducing economic reforms, improving public good provision, and reducing social unrest

NBER Working Paper no. 20004, March 2014, revised May 2015

Alesina, Alberto and Giuliano, Paola

Culture and institutions

Culture, including trust, family ties, individualism, and generalized morality, and institutions, including political and legal institutions, regulation, and the welfare state, interact and evolve in a complementary way, with mutual feedback effects on the speed of development and wealth

NBER Working Paper series no. 19750, December 2013

Barro, Robert J.

Democracy and growth

Favourable effects on growth include rule of law, free markets, small government consumption, and high human capital. But the net effect of democracy on growth performance cross-nationally is negative or null. Many countries have become rich under authoritarian auspices. Democracy enhances growth at low levels of political freedom

Journal of Economic Growth 1:1–27, March 1996

Depetris-Chauvin, Emilio

State history, contemporary conflict: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa

Regions with long histories of statehood are better equipped with mechanisms to establish and preserve order. They are less prone to experience conflict when hit by a negative economic shocks

Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2679594, October 2015

Diamond, Jared

A country’s affluence depends partly on its institutions, on geographic and other historical factors

Institutions don’t arise at random around the world but are outcomes of a long history shaped by geography, and they are linked inextricably with the origins of states. Countries with a long history of state societies have tended to enjoy high growth once they added advanced technology to their institutional advantages

“Economics: The wealth of nations”, Nature 429: 616–617, June 2004

Chanda, Areendam and Louis, Putterman

Early starts, reversals and catch-up in the process of economic development

More rapid growth by early starters (China, India, Greece) than latercomers to agriculture and statehood has been the norm in economic history, and the “reversal of fortune” associated with the European overseas expansion that began around 1500 was both exceptional and temporary

LSU Working Paper series, 2005–2006

Feng, YI

Democracy, political stability and economic growth

Democracy has a positive indirect effect upon growth through its impacts on the probabilities of both regime change and constitutional government. Long-run economic growth tends to exert a positive effect upon democracy

British Journal of Political Sciences 27(3): 391–418, July 1997

Gorodnichenko, Yuriy, and Roland, Gerard

Culture, institutions, and the wealth of nations

Economic impacts of culture based on the frequency of specific genetic variables: Individualism or collectivism impact on innovation and growth. More individualist culture that emphasizes personal freedom and achievement leads to more innovation and to higher long-run growth

Review of Economics and Statistics 99: 402–416, July 2017

Gerring, John

Bond, Philip

Barndt, William

And Moreno, Carola

Democracy and economic growth: A historical perspective

If Democracy matters for growth today, due to a country’s regime history as well as its current status. The distant past may have contemporary effects. Democracy is thus best considered as a stock, rather than level, variable. Secular-historical experience of democracy and authoritarianism matters: long-term democracy leads to stronger economic performance

World Politics 57(3): 323–364, April 2005

Glaeser, Edward L., La Porta, Rafael, Lopez de Silanes, Florencio, and Andrei, Shleifer

Do institutions cause growth?

Existing research does not show that political institutions rather than human capital have a causal effect on economic growth. Much evidence points to the primacy of human capital for both growth and democratization. Poor countries get out of poverty through good policy choices, often pursued by dictators, to subsequently improve their political institutions

NBER Working Paper series no. 10568, June 2004. Journal of Economic Growth 9(3): 271–303, September 2004

La Porta, Rafael

Lopez de Silanes, Florencio, and

Andrei, Shleifer

The economic consequences of legal origins

Legal origins, i.e., highly persistent systems of social control of economic life, have significant consequences for the legal and regulatory framework of the society, as well as for economic outcomes. The policy-implementing focus of civil law versus the market-supporting focus of common law impacts on economic and social outcomes

Journal of Economic Literature 46(2): 285–332, June 2008

La Porta, Rafael

Lopez de Silanes, Florencio

Shleifer, Andrei

and Robert, Vishny

The quality of government

Countries that are poor, close to the equator, ethnolinguistically heterogeneous, use French or socialist laws, have high proportions of Catholic or Muslims, exhibit inferior government performance. In Catholic countries, governments tend to be less efficient and more corrupt compared to Protestant and common law countries

Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15(1): 222–279, March 1999

Kynge, James, McKinsey Global Institute

Data-centric approach to governance and economic growth

China’s hybrid strain combines rigid political control, central planning and free-market flexibility. Data revolution and party-state lead to “techno-tatorship” to create new economic dynamics with sociopolitical stability. Digital technologies help resolve systemic inadequacies that stem from the corruption-driven centralized authority

Financial Times, October 28–29, 2017

Przeworski, Adam

Country-specific conditions shape institutions

Political regimes may have two effects on the rate of growth: a direct one on factor productivity, and an indirect one, via the growth of the labor force. Projects of institutional reform must take as their point of departure the actual conditions, not blueprints based on institutions that have been successful elsewhere

Government and Opposition, British Political Science Association, Blackwell Publishing, April 2004

Przeworski, Adam, et al.

Democracy and development, political institutions and well-being in the world,1950–1990

Economic development does not tend to generate democracies, but democracies are more likely to survive in wealthy societies. The type of political regime has no impact on the growth of national income, and political instability affects growth only in dictatorships. Per capita incomes rise more rapidly in democracies due to lower population increase. Political regimes have greater effects on demography than on economics

Cambridge University Press, 2000

Putterman Louis

Ripple effects of the Neolithic Revolution on modern development process

Differences among human societies with respect to the timing of the transition to agriculture led to differences in levels of technological development and social organization that persisted into the era of European expansion and colonization. Early reliance on agriculture at the time of the Neolithic Revolution is still impacting on today’s income differences and levels of economic development across countries

Economica New Series 75(300): 729–748, November 2008

Muller, Edward and Mitchell A. Seligson

Inequality and insurgency

When income inequality is high, the probability of domestic political violence increases substantially, and can lead to uprisings and civil war, hence slowing economic growth

American Political Science Review 81(2): 425–450, 1987

Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi

Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development

There are substantial, economic gains in improving institutions. Geography and History are not key determinants of development. If colonial experiences were the key determinant of income levels, how would one account for the income variations among countries that had never been colonized?

Journal of Economic Growth 131–165, November 2004

Robinson, James

Economic development and democracy

There is no evidence that economic development has a causal effect on democracy. Neither does it support the idea that economic development influences the probability of coups but not democratization. Economic development comes along with changes in the structure of the economy that are related to capital intensity. Countries with higher income per capita would be more capital intensive, hence generating an empirical relationship between income per capita and democracy but income has no causal effect on democracy

Annual Review of Political Science 9: 503–527, 2006

Sharma, Ruchir

Why economic forecasts fail

Straight-line extrapolations are almost always wrong. Institutions and demographics change too slowly to offer any clear indication of where an economy is headed. Though certain national cultures are good or bad for growth, the point is that culture can change quickly. Political cycles are as important to a nation’s prospects as economic ones. To sustain rapid growth, leaders must balance a wide range of factors, and the list changes as a country grows richer

Foreign Affairs 52–56, January–February 2014

Sollogoub, Tania

Where the anger is coming from?

The resurgence of populist movements has always heralded a weakening of democracies. Such movements emerge when traditional political parties lose legitimacy. They fill a political vacuum and are a symptom of the crisis before becoming its cause. Wealth gaps and social imbalances born of globalization and technological progress feed frustration and social unrest

Credit Agricole Group, Economic Research, December 2016

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bouchet, M.H., Fishkin, C.A., Goguel, A. (2018). The Root Causes and Consequences of Political Risk: From Bad Governance to Wealth and Political Power Concentration and Social Instability. In: Managing Country Risk in an Age of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89752-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89752-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89751-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89752-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics