Abstract
This chapter addresses the root causes of sociopolitical instability. It explores the theme that economic growth must be coupled with socio-institutional flexibility to stem the tensions that arise from unequal income distribution and large wealth gaps both within and between countries. The chapter further analyses the close correlation between corruption and unfavorable business conditions, as well as between corruption and income inequality. It concludes by identifying the various measures of political risks and by the need for risk analysts to look at the power structure of countries to identify the root causes of potential social upheaval. Ratings and rankings can never be substitutes to in-depth analysis backed by a wide range of information sources.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abed, George, and Sanjeev Gupta (eds.). 2002. Governance, Corruption, & Economic Performance. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James Robinson. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–1401.
Acemoglu, Daron, Suresh Naidu, Pascual Restrepo, and James Robinson. 2015. “Democracy Does Cause Growth.” NBER Working Paper No. 20004, March 2014. Revised May 2015.
African Development Bank. 1998. Annual Report: Governance and Economic Management.
Bachelet, Michele. 2007. “Promoting Growth and Social Progress. Interview: McKinsey Quarterly Special Edition.” http://e-lecciones.net/archivos/loultimo/Bachalet.pdf.
Barton, Dominic. 2011. “Capitalism for the Long-Term.” Harvard Business Review, March 2011.
Bouchet, Michel Henry. 2010. “Economie de la Connaissance et Hyperfinance: De la Globalisation des Crises Aujourd’hui à la Régulation Globale Demain?” In Management de l’Economie de la Connaissance, edited by Ludovic Dibiaggio and Pierre-Xavier Meschi. Paris: Pearson.
Bouchet, Michel Henry. 2010–2018. “Country Risk Seminars and Country Risk MOOC.” Skema Business School. http://www.developingfinance.org.
CBonds. 2009. “Republic of Tunisia Foreign Currency Rating Affirmed At ‘BBB’; Local Currency Rating Lowered to ‘A−’; Outlooks Stable,” April 6. http://cbonds.com/news/item/428938.
CIA. 2017. World FactBook. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/.
Coplin, William, and Michael O’Leary. 1972. Everyman’s Prince: A Guide to Understanding Your Political Problems. London: Duxbury Press.
Fukuyama, Francis. 2000. “Social Capital and Civil Society.” IMF Working Paper WP/00/74, IMF Institute.
Glaeser, Edward L., Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez de Silanes and Andrei Shleifer. 2004. “Do Institutions Cause Growth?” NBER Working Paper No. 10568, June.
IMF. 2010. Tunisia: 2010 Article IV Consultation: Staff Report; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Tunisia, September 8.
Jensen, Nathan. 2008. “Political Risk, Democratic Institutions, and Foreign Direct Investment.” Journal of Politics 70 (4): 1040–1052.
Kaufmann, Daniel, Art Kraay, and Pablo Zoido-Lobatao. 2000. “Governance Matters: From Measurement to Action.” Finance & Development 37 (2): 10–13.
Krueger, Anne. 1993. “Virtuous and Vicious Circles in Economic Development.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 83: 351–355.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez de Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2008. “The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins.” Journal of Economic Literature 46 (2): 285–332.
Middle East Online. 2008. “IMF Hails Tunisian Economic Policies.” http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=28865.
Muller, Edward, and Mitchell A. Seligson. 1987. “Inequality and Insurgency.” American Political Science Review 81 (2): 425–450.
OECD. 2016. Income Inequality Remains High in the Face of Weak Recovery. Center for Opportunity and Equality, November, Paris: OECD Press. https://www.oecd.org/social/OECD2016-Income-Inequality-Update.pdf.
Ostry, Jonathan D., Prakash Loungani, and Davide Furceri. 2016. Neoliberalism: Oversold?” Finance and Development 53 (2): 38–41.
Piketty, Thomas, Emmanuel Saez, and Gabriel Zucman. 2016. “Distributional National Accounts: Methods and Estimates for the United States”. Washignton Center for Equitable Growth Working Paper, December 6.
Robinson, James. 2006. “Economic Development and Democracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 9: 503–527.
Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi. 2004. “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions over Geography and Integration in Economic Development.” Journal of Economic Growth 9 (November): 131–165.
Shambaugh, Jay, and Ryann Nunn. 2017. “Why Wages Aren’t Growing in America.” Harvard Business Review, October 24, 2017.
Shambaugh, Jay, Ryann Nunn, Patrick Liu, and Greg Nantz. 2017. Thirteen Facts About Wage Growth. Figure B. Page iii. Economic Facts. The Hamilton Project. The Brookings Institute.
Standard & Poor’s. 2004. Sovereign Credit Ratings: A Primer, March 15.
Summers, Larry. 2000. Statement of Secretary of Treasury Lawrence H. Summers at the Development Committee of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. Prague, Czech Republic, September 25. https://www.imf.org/external/am/2000/dc/eng/usa.htm.
Teulings, Coen. 2012. “Fiscal Consolidation and Reforms: Substitutes, Not Complements.” VOX-CEPR’s Policy Portal, September 13. http://voxeu.org/article/fiscal-consolidation-and-reforms-substitutes-not-complements.
The Telegraph. 2010. “Wen Jiabao Promises Political Reform for China,” October 4.
Vijayakumar, Jayaraman, Abdul A. Rasheed, and Rasul H. Tondkar. 2009. “Foreign Direct Investment and Evaluation of Country Risk: An Empirical Investigation.” Multinational Business Review 17 (3): 184–204.
Williamson, John. 1990. “Latin American Adjustment: How Much has Happened?” Washignton, DC: Institute for International Economics.
Williamson, John. 2004. “The Washington Consensus as Policy Prescription for Development.” Speech Delivered at the World Bank, January 13. https://piie.com/publications/papers/williamson0204.pdf.
World Bank. 1989. “Sustainable Growth with Equity: A Long-Term Perspective for Sub-Saharan Africa.” Report No. 8014, Technical Department, Africa Region, August 15.
World Bank. 2007. “World Governance Indicators.” http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/#reports.
World Wealth and Income Database. 2017. “World Inequality Report 2018, World Inequality Database.” http://wid.world/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 10.2 Concise Survey of Academic Literature Regarding the Relationships Between Country Risk Stability, Institutions, Democracy, and Socioeconomic Development
Appendix 10.2 Concise Survey of Academic Literature Regarding the Relationships Between Country Risk Stability, Institutions, Democracy, and Socioeconomic Development
Author | Topic | Relationships democracy, development, and country risk stability | References |
---|---|---|---|
Acemoglu, Daron and Robinson, James | Why nations fail | Openness of a society, its willingness to permit creative destruction, and the rule of law are decisive for economic development. Countries escape poverty only when they have appropriate economic institutions, especially private property and competition. In consensually strong states, politicians and political elites are weak, and citizens give them a “long leash” in the economy, consenting to high taxes, regulation, and involvement by the state, with the expectation that the politicians in power and the bureaucrats will work for the citizens’ benefits | Crown Publishing Group, NY, 2012 |
Acemoglu Daron Johnson, Simon and James, Robinson | The colonial origins of comparative development | Differences in colonial experience could be a source of differences in institutional development. The feasibility of European settlement stemmed from differences in mortality rates. European colonization has led to institutions that enforced the rule of law and encouraged investment, or to extractive states and social systems that were detrimental to economic progress | NBER, Working Paper series no. 7771, June 2000 |
Acemoglu, Daron and James, Robinson | The role of institutions in growth and development | Institutions are collective choices that are the outcome of a political process. The economic institutions of a society depend on the nature of political institutions and the distribution of political power in society. The main determinants of differences in prosperity across countries are differences in economic institutions. Success and pitfalls of institutional reforms are keys to solve the problem of development and poverty | Commission on Growth and Development, Working Paper no. 10, The World Bank, 2008 |
Acemoglu, Daron, Suresh Naidu, Pascual Restrepo, and James Robinson | Democracy does cause growth | Democracy has a significant positive effect on GDP per capita: democratizations increase GDP per capita by about 20% in the long run by encouraging investment, increasing schooling, inducing economic reforms, improving public good provision, and reducing social unrest | NBER Working Paper no. 20004, March 2014, revised May 2015 |
Alesina, Alberto and Giuliano, Paola | Culture and institutions | Culture, including trust, family ties, individualism, and generalized morality, and institutions, including political and legal institutions, regulation, and the welfare state, interact and evolve in a complementary way, with mutual feedback effects on the speed of development and wealth | NBER Working Paper series no. 19750, December 2013 |
Barro, Robert J. | Democracy and growth | Favourable effects on growth include rule of law, free markets, small government consumption, and high human capital. But the net effect of democracy on growth performance cross-nationally is negative or null. Many countries have become rich under authoritarian auspices. Democracy enhances growth at low levels of political freedom | Journal of Economic Growth 1:1–27, March 1996 |
Depetris-Chauvin, Emilio | State history, contemporary conflict: evidence from sub-Saharan Africa | Regions with long histories of statehood are better equipped with mechanisms to establish and preserve order. They are less prone to experience conflict when hit by a negative economic shocks | Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2679594, October 2015 |
Diamond, Jared | A country’s affluence depends partly on its institutions, on geographic and other historical factors | Institutions don’t arise at random around the world but are outcomes of a long history shaped by geography, and they are linked inextricably with the origins of states. Countries with a long history of state societies have tended to enjoy high growth once they added advanced technology to their institutional advantages | “Economics: The wealth of nations”, Nature 429: 616–617, June 2004 |
Chanda, Areendam and Louis, Putterman | Early starts, reversals and catch-up in the process of economic development | More rapid growth by early starters (China, India, Greece) than latercomers to agriculture and statehood has been the norm in economic history, and the “reversal of fortune” associated with the European overseas expansion that began around 1500 was both exceptional and temporary | LSU Working Paper series, 2005–2006 |
Feng, YI | Democracy, political stability and economic growth | Democracy has a positive indirect effect upon growth through its impacts on the probabilities of both regime change and constitutional government. Long-run economic growth tends to exert a positive effect upon democracy | British Journal of Political Sciences 27(3): 391–418, July 1997 |
Gorodnichenko, Yuriy, and Roland, Gerard | Culture, institutions, and the wealth of nations | Economic impacts of culture based on the frequency of specific genetic variables: Individualism or collectivism impact on innovation and growth. More individualist culture that emphasizes personal freedom and achievement leads to more innovation and to higher long-run growth | Review of Economics and Statistics 99: 402–416, July 2017 |
Gerring, John Bond, Philip Barndt, William And Moreno, Carola | Democracy and economic growth: A historical perspective | If Democracy matters for growth today, due to a country’s regime history as well as its current status. The distant past may have contemporary effects. Democracy is thus best considered as a stock, rather than level, variable. Secular-historical experience of democracy and authoritarianism matters: long-term democracy leads to stronger economic performance | World Politics 57(3): 323–364, April 2005 |
Glaeser, Edward L., La Porta, Rafael, Lopez de Silanes, Florencio, and Andrei, Shleifer | Do institutions cause growth? | Existing research does not show that political institutions rather than human capital have a causal effect on economic growth. Much evidence points to the primacy of human capital for both growth and democratization. Poor countries get out of poverty through good policy choices, often pursued by dictators, to subsequently improve their political institutions | NBER Working Paper series no. 10568, June 2004. Journal of Economic Growth 9(3): 271–303, September 2004 |
La Porta, Rafael Lopez de Silanes, Florencio, and Andrei, Shleifer | The economic consequences of legal origins | Legal origins, i.e., highly persistent systems of social control of economic life, have significant consequences for the legal and regulatory framework of the society, as well as for economic outcomes. The policy-implementing focus of civil law versus the market-supporting focus of common law impacts on economic and social outcomes | Journal of Economic Literature 46(2): 285–332, June 2008 |
La Porta, Rafael Lopez de Silanes, Florencio Shleifer, Andrei and Robert, Vishny | The quality of government | Countries that are poor, close to the equator, ethnolinguistically heterogeneous, use French or socialist laws, have high proportions of Catholic or Muslims, exhibit inferior government performance. In Catholic countries, governments tend to be less efficient and more corrupt compared to Protestant and common law countries | Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 15(1): 222–279, March 1999 |
Kynge, James, McKinsey Global Institute | Data-centric approach to governance and economic growth | China’s hybrid strain combines rigid political control, central planning and free-market flexibility. Data revolution and party-state lead to “techno-tatorship” to create new economic dynamics with sociopolitical stability. Digital technologies help resolve systemic inadequacies that stem from the corruption-driven centralized authority | Financial Times, October 28–29, 2017 |
Przeworski, Adam | Country-specific conditions shape institutions | Political regimes may have two effects on the rate of growth: a direct one on factor productivity, and an indirect one, via the growth of the labor force. Projects of institutional reform must take as their point of departure the actual conditions, not blueprints based on institutions that have been successful elsewhere | Government and Opposition, British Political Science Association, Blackwell Publishing, April 2004 |
Przeworski, Adam, et al. | Democracy and development, political institutions and well-being in the world,1950–1990 | Economic development does not tend to generate democracies, but democracies are more likely to survive in wealthy societies. The type of political regime has no impact on the growth of national income, and political instability affects growth only in dictatorships. Per capita incomes rise more rapidly in democracies due to lower population increase. Political regimes have greater effects on demography than on economics | Cambridge University Press, 2000 |
Putterman Louis | Ripple effects of the Neolithic Revolution on modern development process | Differences among human societies with respect to the timing of the transition to agriculture led to differences in levels of technological development and social organization that persisted into the era of European expansion and colonization. Early reliance on agriculture at the time of the Neolithic Revolution is still impacting on today’s income differences and levels of economic development across countries | Economica New Series 75(300): 729–748, November 2008 |
Muller, Edward and Mitchell A. Seligson | Inequality and insurgency | When income inequality is high, the probability of domestic political violence increases substantially, and can lead to uprisings and civil war, hence slowing economic growth | American Political Science Review 81(2): 425–450, 1987 |
Rodrik, Dani, Arvind Subramanian, and Francesco Trebbi | Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development | There are substantial, economic gains in improving institutions. Geography and History are not key determinants of development. If colonial experiences were the key determinant of income levels, how would one account for the income variations among countries that had never been colonized? | Journal of Economic Growth 131–165, November 2004 |
Robinson, James | Economic development and democracy | There is no evidence that economic development has a causal effect on democracy. Neither does it support the idea that economic development influences the probability of coups but not democratization. Economic development comes along with changes in the structure of the economy that are related to capital intensity. Countries with higher income per capita would be more capital intensive, hence generating an empirical relationship between income per capita and democracy but income has no causal effect on democracy | Annual Review of Political Science 9: 503–527, 2006 |
Sharma, Ruchir | Why economic forecasts fail | Straight-line extrapolations are almost always wrong. Institutions and demographics change too slowly to offer any clear indication of where an economy is headed. Though certain national cultures are good or bad for growth, the point is that culture can change quickly. Political cycles are as important to a nation’s prospects as economic ones. To sustain rapid growth, leaders must balance a wide range of factors, and the list changes as a country grows richer | Foreign Affairs 52–56, January–February 2014 |
Sollogoub, Tania | Where the anger is coming from? | The resurgence of populist movements has always heralded a weakening of democracies. Such movements emerge when traditional political parties lose legitimacy. They fill a political vacuum and are a symptom of the crisis before becoming its cause. Wealth gaps and social imbalances born of globalization and technological progress feed frustration and social unrest | Credit Agricole Group, Economic Research, December 2016 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouchet, M.H., Fishkin, C.A., Goguel, A. (2018). The Root Causes and Consequences of Political Risk: From Bad Governance to Wealth and Political Power Concentration and Social Instability. In: Managing Country Risk in an Age of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89752-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89752-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89751-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89752-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)