Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TraceME chunks: the design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
TraceME: A Traceability-Based Method for Conceptual Model Evolution

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 312))

  • 310 Accesses

Abstract

.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bruneliere, H., et al.: MoDisco: A generic and extensible framework for model driven reverse engineering. In: IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE 2010). ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. González, A., et al.: Message Structures a modelling technique for information systems analysis and design. In: Lencastre, M., Estrada Esquivel, H., Figueiredo, E. (eds.) XIV Workshop on Requirements Engineering (WER 2011), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. pp. 407–418 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gonzalez, A., España, S., Pastor, O.: Unity criteria for business process modelling: A theoretical argumentation for a software engineering recurrent problem. In: Third International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2009), pp. 173–182. IEEE, Fes, Morocco (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution (revised). HarperCollins, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Henderson, J.C., Venkatraman, N.: Strategic alignment: leveraging information Technology for transforming organizations. IBM Syst. J. 38(2-3), 472–484 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zikra, I., Stirna, J., Zdravkovic, J.: Bringing enterprise modeling closer to model-driven development. In: Johannesson, P., Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) PoEM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 92, pp. 268–282. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24849-8_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Guizzardi, R., Reis, A.N.: A method to align goals and business processes. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M.L., Liddle, S.W., Opdahl, A.L., López, Ó.P. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 79–93. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25264-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardoso, E.C.S., Guizzardi, R.S.S., Almeida, J.P.A.: Aligning goal analysis and business process modelling: a case study in health care. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management 5(2), 144–158 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wieringa, R.: Design science as nested problem solving. In: 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology, pp. 1–12. ACM, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ralyté, J., Rolland, C.: An assembly process model for method engineering. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M.C. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 267–283. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45341-5_18

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Guizzardi, R.S.S., Guizzardi, G.: Applying the UFO ontology to design an agent-oriented engineering language. In: Catania, B., Ivanović, M., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ADBIS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6295, pp. 190–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15576-5_16

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Guizzardi, R.S.S.: Agent-oriented Constructivist Knowledge Management. University of Twente, The Netherlands (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bresciani, P., et al.: Tropos: An Agent-Oriented Software Development Methodology. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 8(3), 203–236 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner, G.: The Agent–Object-Relationship metamodel: towards a unified view of state and behavior. Information Systems 28(5), 475–504 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. España, S.: Methodological integration of Communication Analysis into a model-driven software development framework. In: Research Centre in Software Production Methods (ProS). Universitat Politècnica de València, Spain (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Costal, D., et al.: Integration of i* and Communication Analysis. GESSI - Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) & PROS - Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ruiz, M., Costal, D., España, S., Franch, X., Pastor, Ó.: Integrating the goal and business process perspectives in information system analysis. In: Jarke, M., Mylopoulos, J., Quix, C., Rolland, C., Manolopoulos, Y., Mouratidis, H., Horkoff, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8484, pp. 332–346. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07881-6_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Opdahl, A., Henderson-Sellers, B., Barbier, F.: An Ontological Evaluation of the OML Metamodel. In: IFIP TC8/WG8.1 International Conference on Information System Concepts: An Integrated Discipline Emerging (ISCO-4), pp. 217–232 (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. López, L., Franch, X., Marco, J.: Making explicit some implicit i* language decisions. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 62–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24606-7_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Alexander, C., Shikawa, S., Silverstein, M.: A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. Oxford University Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gamma, E., et al.: Design Patterns. Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pfiser, F., et al.: A Design Pattern Meta Model for Systems Engineering. In: 18th International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC 2011), pp. 11967–11972 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jouault, F.: Loosely coupled traceability for ATL. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Model Driven Architecture (ECMDA) Workshop On Traceability (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. OMG. Unified Modeling Language v1.5. (2003). http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/03-03-01 (cited 2005 12-2005)

  25. España, S., et al.: Rules for the manual derivation of the Conceptual Model. In: ProS-TR-2011-10, p. 38. ProS Research Centre, Universitat Poliècnica de València, València, Spain (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. España, S.: Departamento de Sistemas Iformáticos y Computación (DSIC). Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. España, S.: Methodological integration of communbication analysis into a model-driven software development framework. In: Departamento de Sistemas Iformáticos y Computación (DSIC). Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  28. España, S., et al.: Integration of Communication Analysis and the OO-Method: Manual derivation of the conceptual model. The SuperStationery Co. lab demo. In: ProS-TR-2011-01 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Budinsky, F., et al.: Eclipse Modeling Framework: A Developer’s Guide, p. 720. Addison-Wesley Professional (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Business alignment: using process mining as a tool for Delta analysis and conformance testing. Requirements Engineering 10(3), 198–211 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Clarke, D., Helvensteijn, M., Schaefer, I.: Abstract delta modeling. In: Generative Programming and Component Engineering (GPCE 2010), Eindhoven, The Netherlands (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Basten, T.: Identifying commonalities and differences in object life cycles using behavioral inheritance. In: Colom, J.-M., Koutny, M. (eds.) ICATPN 2001. LNCS, vol. 2075, pp. 32–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45740-2_4

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Exterminating the Dynamic Change Bug: A Concrete Approach to Support Workflow Change. Information Systems Frontiers 3(3), 297–317 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Marcela Ruiz

Authors
  1. Marcela Ruiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcela Ruiz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ruiz, M. (2018). TraceME chunks: the design. In: TraceME: A Traceability-Based Method for Conceptual Model Evolution . Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 312. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89716-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89716-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89715-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89716-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation