Skip to main content

The Scout Film

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Chest CT for Non-Radiologists

Abstract

Six to eleven percent of important findings are excluded in the CT FOV, and 2% of these can be seen on the scout film, thus highlighting its importance [Johnson et al., AJR Am J Roentgenol. 202:1256–1263, 2014]. Leonard Berlin’s article, reviewing the CT scout view: medicolegal and ethical considerations, admits that the scout film is unlikely to demonstrate a significant abnormality; however, because 85 million CT scans are performed a year, the scout film could help to identify nearly 2.5 million abnormalities not included on the CT scan FOV [Berlin, AJR Am J Roentgenol. 202:1264–1266, 2014]. The value of the scout film cannot be overstated; it provides an overview of the patient’s condition. Review of the scout film helps you to identify lines and tubes that you may otherwise have ignored. Orthopedic hardware assessment is facilitated on the scout film as is foreign body recognition. Scoliosis can be measured on the scout film [Ho et al., Spine (Phila PA 1976). 17:771–774, 1992]. Diaphragmatic elevation can be quantified on this view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnson PT, Scott WW, Gayler BW, Lewin JS, Fishman EK. The CT scout view: does it need to be routinely reviewed as part of the CT interpretation? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:1256–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berlin L. Reviewing the CT scout view: medicolegal and ethical considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(6):1264–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ho EK, Upadhyay SS, Ferris L, Chan FL, Bacon-Shone J, Hsu LC, Leong JC. A comparative study of computed tomographic and plain radiographic methods to measure vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 1992;17(7):771–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodman LR, Conrardy PA, Laing F, Singer MM. Radiographic evaluation of endotracheal tube position. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1976;127(3):433–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pillai JB, Vegas A, Brister S. Thoracic complications of nasogastric tube: review of safe practice. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;4(5):429–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Funaki B. Central venous access: a primer for the diagnostic radiologist. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(2):309–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Godoy MC, Leitman BS, de Groot PM, Vlahos I, Naidich DP. Chest radiography in the ICU: part 1, evaluation of airway, enteric, and pleural tubes. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;198(3):563–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schimmer C, Reents W, Elert O. Primary closure of median sternotomy: a survey of all German surgical heart centers and a review of the literature concerning sternal closure technique. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54(6):408–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharifi M, Inbar S, Neckels B, Shook H. Twiddling to the extreme: development of twiddler syndrome in an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator. J Invasive Cardiol. 2005;17(3):195–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yian EH, Werner CM, Nyffeler RW, Pfirrmann CW, Ramappa A, Sukthankar A, Gerber C. Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(9):1928–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rao AG. Haller index in patients with pectus excavatum. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(5):W665. author reply W666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Langensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, Fricke O, Franklin J, Schönau E, Eysel P. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(11):2360–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Katzman WB, Wanek L, Shepherd JA, Sellmeyer DE. Age-related hyperkyphosis: its causes, consequences, and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(6):352–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Iochum S, Ludig T, Walter F, Sebbag H, Grosdidier G, Blum AG. Imaging of diaphragmatic injury: a diagnostic challenge. Radiographics. 2002;22:S103–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaissert H, Wilcox SR. Diaphragmatic dysfunction after thoracic operations. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64(8):621–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Verhey PT, Gosselin MV, Primack SL, Kraemer AC. Differentiating diaphragmatic paralysis and eventration. Acad Radiol. 2007;14(4):420–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Salvatore, M.M., Go, R.C., Pernia M., M.A. (2018). The Scout Film. In: Chest CT for Non-Radiologists. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89710-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89710-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89709-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89710-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics