Skip to main content

Project-Based Learning Progressions: Identifying the Nodes of Learning in a Project-Based Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Technologies in Education

Abstract

This chapter describes the background of learning progressions and project-based learning and their application for learning and instruction for students at age levels that range from the elementary-school level to undergraduate college students in STEM career fields. The use of learning progressions as methods of both assessment and instruction is also examined. The chapter describes both learning progressions and project-based learning individually and then explains how the two can be combined into what we have called a project-based learning progression and how this may be beneficial to teaching and learning at the K-12 level. This chapter concludes by describing that there may be evidence to suggest that a learning progression occurs through project-based learning paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Annetta, L. (2008). Serious educational games: From theory to practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelleri, D. J., & Vitoroulis, N. (2013). The robotic decathlon: Project-based learning labs and curriculum design for an introductory robotics course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2215329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, R. H., Minasian, R. A., & Yi, X. (2012). Inspiring student learning in ICT communications electronics through a new integrated project-based learning approach. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 49(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.49.2.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., & Klymkowsky, M. (2013). Chemistry, life, the universe, and everything: A new approach to general chemistry, and a model for curriculum reform. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1116–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 606–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understandings of modern genetics across the 5th–10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1181–1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., Sher, B., Stepien, W., & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 95(3), 136–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotwals, A. W., & Songer, N. B. (2013). Validity evidence for learning progression-based assessment items that fuse core disciplinary ideas and science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 597–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griva, E., & Semoglou, K. (2012). Estimating the effectiveness and feasibility of a game-based project for early foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1149–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P., & Tymms, P. (2011). The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 849–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P., Hong, J.-S., Bonk, C., & Lim, G. (2011). Effects of group reflection variations in project-based learning integrated in a Web 2.0 learning space. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903210782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Vallett, D. B., & Sadler, T. D. (2014a). Cognitive diagnostic like approaches using neural-network analysis of serious educational videogames. Computers & Education, 70, 92–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R. L., Vallett, D. B., Akmal, T., & Baldwin, K. (2014b). A computational modeling of student cognitive processes in science education. Computers & Education, 79, 116–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-J., & Lim, C. (2012). Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning: What do students find important? Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 214–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2009). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project based learning. Novato: Buck Institute for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.), Committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J. D., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 768–787. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, J. D., & Maynard, L. (2014). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students’ reasoning about the seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 902–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravitz, J. (2008). Project based learning as a catalyst in reforming high schools. Retrieved from the Buck Institute for Education website: http://www.bie.org/research/library/P10/

  • Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Reflections on learning progressions. Proceedings of the learning progressions in science conference. Iowa City, IA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Songer, N. B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Guiding explanation construction by children at the entry points of learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 610–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steedle, J. T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 699–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 687–715. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael: Autodesk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeren Özer, D., & Özkan, M. (2012). The effect of the project based learning on the science process skills of the prospective teachers of science. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 9(3), 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonard A. Annetta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Annetta, L.A., Lamb, R., Vallett, D., Shapiro, M. (2019). Project-Based Learning Progressions: Identifying the Nodes of Learning in a Project-Based Environment. In: Adesope, O.O., Rud, A.G. (eds) Contemporary Technologies in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89680-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89680-9_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89679-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89680-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics