Advertisement

Project-Based Learning Progressions: Identifying the Nodes of Learning in a Project-Based Environment

  • Leonard A. AnnettaEmail author
  • Richard Lamb
  • David Vallett
  • Marina Shapiro
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter describes the background of learning progressions and project-based learning and their application for learning and instruction for students at age levels that range from the elementary-school level to undergraduate college students in STEM career fields. The use of learning progressions as methods of both assessment and instruction is also examined. The chapter describes both learning progressions and project-based learning individually and then explains how the two can be combined into what we have called a project-based learning progression and how this may be beneficial to teaching and learning at the K-12 level. This chapter concludes by describing that there may be evidence to suggest that a learning progression occurs through project-based learning paradigms.

Keywords

Learning progressions Project-based learning STEM K-12 

References

  1. Annetta, L. (2008). Serious educational games: From theory to practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cappelleri, D. J., & Vitoroulis, N. (2013). The robotic decathlon: Project-based learning labs and curriculum design for an introductory robotics course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(1), 73–81.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2012.2215329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chu, R. H., Minasian, R. A., & Yi, X. (2012). Inspiring student learning in ICT communications electronics through a new integrated project-based learning approach. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, 49(2), 127–135.  https://doi.org/10.7227/IJEEE.49.2.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, M., & Klymkowsky, M. (2013). Chemistry, life, the universe, and everything: A new approach to general chemistry, and a model for curriculum reform. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(9), 1116–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.Google Scholar
  7. Duncan, R. G., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2009). Learning progressions: Aligning curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 606–609.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understandings of modern genetics across the 5th–10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 655–674.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1181–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher, S., Sher, B., Stepien, W., & Workman, D. (1995). Implementing problem-based learning in science classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 95(3), 136–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context (NCES 2009-001). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  12. Gotwals, A. W., & Songer, N. B. (2013). Validity evidence for learning progression-based assessment items that fuse core disciplinary ideas and science practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 597–626.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griva, E., & Semoglou, K. (2012). Estimating the effectiveness and feasibility of a game-based project for early foreign language learning. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 33–44.  https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n9p33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hwang, G. J., & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1149–1180.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, P., & Tymms, P. (2011). The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 849–877.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim, P., Hong, J.-S., Bonk, C., & Lim, G. (2011). Effects of group reflection variations in project-based learning integrated in a Web 2.0 learning space. Interactive Learning Environments, 19(4), 333–349.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820903210782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lamb, R. L., Annetta, L., Vallett, D. B., & Sadler, T. D. (2014a). Cognitive diagnostic like approaches using neural-network analysis of serious educational videogames. Computers & Education, 70, 92–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamb, R. L., Vallett, D. B., Akmal, T., & Baldwin, K. (2014b). A computational modeling of student cognitive processes in science education. Computers & Education, 79, 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, H.-J., & Lim, C. (2012). Peer evaluation in blended team project-based learning: What do students find important? Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 214–224.Google Scholar
  21. Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2009). Project based learning handbook: A guide to standards-focused project based learning. Novato: Buck Institute for Education.Google Scholar
  22. Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 675–698.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Research Council. (2001). Classroom assessment and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  24. National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.), Committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  25. Neumann, K., Viering, T., Boone, W. J., & Fischer, H. E. (2013). Towards a learning progression of energy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 162–188.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  27. Plummer, J. D., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 768–787.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Plummer, J. D., & Maynard, L. (2014). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students’ reasoning about the seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 902–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ravitz, J. (2008). Project based learning as a catalyst in reforming high schools. Retrieved from the Buck Institute for Education website: http://www.bie.org/research/library/P10/
  30. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Shwartz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Reflections on learning progressions. Proceedings of the learning progressions in science conference. Iowa City, IA, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Songer, N. B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Guiding explanation construction by children at the entry points of learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 141–165.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 610–631.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steedle, J. T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 699–715.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 687–715.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael: Autodesk.Google Scholar
  37. Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 23(1), 87–102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zeren Özer, D., & Özkan, M. (2012). The effect of the project based learning on the science process skills of the prospective teachers of science. Journal of Turkish Science Education (TUSED), 9(3), 131–136.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard A. Annetta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard Lamb
    • 2
  • David Vallett
    • 3
  • Marina Shapiro
    • 4
  1. 1.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  2. 2.University of BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  3. 3.University of Nevada-Las VegasLas VegasUSA
  4. 4.California State University-BakersfieldBakersfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations