Enhancing Self-Regulated Learning for Information Problem Solving with Ambient Big Data Gathered by nStudy
Learning projects are major academic assignments. They benefit from productive self-regulated learning to improve skills for solving information problems of searching for, analyzing, mining and organizing unfamiliar content. Findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the “gold standard” for research, are recommended to meet these needs but RCTs poorly serve this purpose. A state-of-the-art learning technology, nStudy, is proposed to support a new approach to learning science and help fill gaps RCTs cannot. In the course of learners’ everyday studying activities, nStudy gathers ambient, fine-grained, trace data fully cataloging information learners operate on and operations they apply to information. Big ambient trace data are raw material for developing learning analytics that support self-regulated learning for improving information problem solving.
KeywordsSelf-regulated learning nStudy Learning analytics Problem solving Big data
- Berman, B. (2016, October 14). Electric cars pros and cons. Retrieved January 8, 2016, from http://www.plugincars.com/electric-cars-pros-and-cons-128637.html
- DiCerbo, K. E., & Behrens, J. T. (2014). Impacts of the digital ocean on education. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (1996). Study skills have meager support: A review of recent research on study skills in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 692–715.Google Scholar
- Hadwin, A. F., Tevaarwerk, K. L., & Ross, S. (2005, April). Do study skills texts foster self-regulated learning: A content analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
- Hart Research Associates. (2013). It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2013_EmployerSurvey.pdf.
- Pistilli, M. D., Willis, J. E., & Campbell, J. P. (2014). Analytics through an institutional lens: Definition, theory, design, and impact. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics: From research to practice (pp. 79–102). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- SSHRC. (2017, February 21). Future challenge areas. Retrieved from http://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/funding-financement/programs-programmes/challenge_areas-domaines_des_defis/index-eng.aspx
- What Works Clearinghouse. (n.d.). Procedures and standards handbook, version 3.0. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf
- Winne, P. H. (2017a). Leveraging big data to help each learner upgrade learning and accelerate learning science. Teachers College Record, 119(3), 1–24.Google Scholar
- Winne, P. H., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2013). The potentials of educational data mining for researching metacognition, motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Winne, P. H., Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., Rakovic, M., Marzouk, Z., Pakdaman-Savoji, A., Ram, I., Samadi, D., Lin, M. P. C., Liu, A., Liaqat, A., Nashaat, N., Mozaffari, Z., Stewart-Alonso, J., & Nesbit, J. C. (2017a). Designs for learning analytics to support information problem solving. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 249–272). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar