Advertisement

Enhancing Self-Regulated Learning for Information Problem Solving with Ambient Big Data Gathered by nStudy

  • Philip H. WinneEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Learning projects are major academic assignments. They benefit from productive self-regulated learning to improve skills for solving information problems of searching for, analyzing, mining and organizing unfamiliar content. Findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the “gold standard” for research, are recommended to meet these needs but RCTs poorly serve this purpose. A state-of-the-art learning technology, nStudy, is proposed to support a new approach to learning science and help fill gaps RCTs cannot. In the course of learners’ everyday studying activities, nStudy gathers ambient, fine-grained, trace data fully cataloging information learners operate on and operations they apply to information. Big ambient trace data are raw material for developing learning analytics that support self-regulated learning for improving information problem solving.

Keywords

Self-regulated learning nStudy Learning analytics Problem solving Big data 

References

  1. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Bradley, R. H. (2005). Those who have, receive: The Matthew effect in early childhood intervention in the home environment. Review of Educational Research, 75, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berman, B. (2016, October 14). Electric cars pros and cons. Retrieved January 8, 2016, from http://www.plugincars.com/electric-cars-pros-and-cons-128637.html
  3. DiCerbo, K. E., & Behrens, J. T. (2014). Impacts of the digital ocean on education. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Eisenberg, M. B. (2008). Information literacy: Essential skills for the information age. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 28(2), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (1996). Study skills have meager support: A review of recent research on study skills in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 692–715.Google Scholar
  6. Hadwin, A. F., & Winne, P. H. (2012). Promoting learning skills in undergraduate students. In M. J. Lawson & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and mental structures (pp. 201–227). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hadwin, A. F., Tevaarwerk, K. L., & Ross, S. (2005, April). Do study skills texts foster self-regulated learning: A content analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
  8. Hart Research Associates. (2013). It takes more than a major: Employer priorities for college learning and student success. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved November 30, 2015, from https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/2013_EmployerSurvey.pdf.
  9. Pistilli, M. D., Willis, J. E., & Campbell, J. P. (2014). Analytics through an institutional lens: Definition, theory, design, and impact. In J. A. Larusson & B. White (Eds.), Learning analytics: From research to practice (pp. 79–102). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  11. What Works Clearinghouse. (n.d.). Procedures and standards handbook, version 3.0. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf
  12. Winne, P. H. (1982). Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effects. Instructional Science, 11, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Winne, P. H. (1992). State-of-the-art instructional computing systems that afford instruction and bootstrap research. In M. Jones & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Adaptive learning environments: Foundations and frontiers (pp. 349–380). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Winne, P. H. (2006). How software technologies can improve research on learning and bolster school reform. Educational Psychologist, 41, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Winne, P. H. (2013). Learning strategies, study skills and self-regulated learning in postsecondary education. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 28, pp. 377–403). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Winne, P. H. (2017a). Leveraging big data to help each learner upgrade learning and accelerate learning science. Teachers College Record, 119(3), 1–24.Google Scholar
  17. Winne, P. H. (2017b). Learning analytics for self-regulated learning. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 241–249). Beaumont: Society for Learning Analytics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Winne, P. H., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2013). The potentials of educational data mining for researching metacognition, motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  19. Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277–304). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Winne, P. H., Vytasek, J. M., Patzak, A., Rakovic, M., Marzouk, Z., Pakdaman-Savoji, A., Ram, I., Samadi, D., Lin, M. P. C., Liu, A., Liaqat, A., Nashaat, N., Mozaffari, Z., Stewart-Alonso, J., & Nesbit, J. C. (2017a). Designs for learning analytics to support information problem solving. In J. Buder & F. W. Hesse (Eds.), Informational environments: Effects of use, effective designs (pp. 249–272). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Winne, P. H., Nesbit, J. C., & Popowich, F. (2017b). nStudy: A system for researching information problem solving. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 22(3), 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Simon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada

Personalised recommendations