Skip to main content

Signaling in Disciplinarily-Integrated Games: Challenges in Integrating Proven Cognitive Scaffolds Within Game Mechanics to Promote Representational Competence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Technologies in Education

Abstract

Years of research has demonstrated the efficacy of signals as scaffolds in multimedia and as visual cues in physics diagrams. The design principles for integrating such signals into digital games for learning has not been explored in similar depth. An experimental study was conducted with sixty-nine middle schoolers to assess the efficacy of using a signaling approach to direct learners’ attention to key conceptual elements within a multi-representational Newtonian physics game, SURGE Symbolic. One condition received signals integrated into the gaming environment, while one did not. Analyses demonstrated that students receiving signals scored significantly worse on posttests than non-signaled students and demonstrated less efficient gaming behaviors beyond the levels that integrated the signals. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how the design principles might be refined to leverage the proven affordances of signaling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, D. M., & Clark, D. B. (2014). Integrating self-explanation functionality into a complex game environment: Keeping gaming in motion. Computers and Education, 73, 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, D. M., Clark, D. B., & Virk, S. S. (2018). Worked examples in physics games: Challenges in integrating proven cognitive scaffolds into game mechanics. In D. Cvetković (Ed.), Simulations and gaming (pp. 61–73). Rijeka: InTECH Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72152. http://www.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/worked-examples-in-physics-games-challenges-in-integratingproven-cognitive-scaffolds-into-game-mech

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, S. E. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ainsworth, S. E. (2014). The multiple representation principle in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 464–486). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brasell, H. (1987). The effect of real-time laboratory graphing on learning graphic representations of distance and velocity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 385–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, B. K., Glynn, S. M., Meyer, B. J. F., & Penland, M. J. (1982). Effects of text structure on use of cognitive capacity during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. B., Sengupta, P., Brady, C., Martinez-Garza, M., & Killingsworth, S. (2015). Disciplinary integration in digital games for science learning. International STEM Education Journal, 2(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-014-0014-4. http://www.stemeducationjournal.com/content/pdf/s40594-014-0014-4.pdf

  • Clark, D. B., Sengupta, P., & Virk, S. S. (2016a). Disciplinarily-integrated games: Generalizing across domains and model types. In D. Russell & J. Laffey (Eds.), Handbook of research on gaming trends in P-12 education (pp. 178–194). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9629-7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. B., Tanner-Smith, E., & Killingsworth, S. (2016b). Digital games, design, and learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 79–122. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465431558206http://rer.sagepub.com/content/86/1/79.full.pdf+html

  • Clark, D. B., Virk, S. S., Barnes, J., & Adams, D. M. (2016c). Self-explanation and digital games: Adaptively increasing abstraction. Computers & Education, 103, 28–43. Online. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. B., Virk, S. S., Sengupta, P., Brady, C., Martinez-Garza, M., Krinks, K., Killingsworth, S., Kinnebrew, J., Biswas, G., Barnes, J., Minstrell, J., Nelson, B., Slack, K., & D’Angelo, C. M. (2016d). SURGE’s evolution deeper into formal representations: The siren’s call of popular game-play mechanics. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 7(1), 107–146. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/ijdl/article/view/19359

  • Craig, S., Gholson, B., & Driscoll, D. (2002). Animated pedagogical agents in multimedia educational environments: Effects of agent properties, picture features, and redundancy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Koning, B., Tabbers, H., Rikers, R., & Paas, F. (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 731–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • diSessa, A., Hammer, D., Sherin, B., & Kolpakowski, T. (1991). Inventing graphing: Meta-representational expertise in children. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 10, 117–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., & Belanger, M. (1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Hillsdale: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.) (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. National Research Council Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 209–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegedus, S., & Roschelle, J. (Eds.). (2013). The SimCalc vision and contributions: Democratizing access to important mathematics. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the FCI. The Physics Teacher, 33, 502–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeung, H., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1997). The role of visual indicators in dual sensory mode instruction. Educational Psychology, 17(3), 329–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook on research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006a). Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 371–388). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006b). Scientific thinking and science literacy: Supporting development in learning in contexts. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, K. A. Renninger, & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, 6th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litchfield, D., & Ball, L. J. (2011). Using another’s gaze as an explicit aid to insight problem solving. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(4), 649–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, R. K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, M., & Atkinson, R. (2007). Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 747–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, A. M., Larson, A. M., Loschky, L. C., & Rebello, N. S. (2012). Differences in visual attention between those who correctly and incorrectly answer physics problems. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 8(1), 010122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, A., Rouinfar, A., Larson, A. M., Loschky, L. C., & Rebello, N. S. (2013). Can short duration visual cues influence students’ reasoning and eye movements in physics problems? Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 9(2), 020104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mautone, P. D., & Mayer, R. E. (2001). Signaling as a cognitive guide in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokros, J. R., & Tinker, R. F. (1987). The impact of microcomputer-based labs on children’s ability to interpret graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660240408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., & Hegedus, S. (2010). From new technological infrastructures to curricular activity systems: Advanced designs for teaching and learning. In M. J. Jacobson & P. Reimann (Eds.), Designs for learning environments of the future: International perspectives from the learning sciences (pp. 233–262). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rouinfar, A., Agra, E., Larson, A. M., Rebello, N. S., & Loschky, L. C. (2014). Linking attentional processes and conceptual problem solving: Visual cues facilitate the automaticity of extracting relevant information from diagrams. [Original research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01094.

  • Sweller, J. (2006). The worked example effect and human cognition. Learning and Instruction, 16, 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. J. (1996). A representational analysis of relational information displays. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1119290. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Virk, S.S., Clark, D.B. (2019). Signaling in Disciplinarily-Integrated Games: Challenges in Integrating Proven Cognitive Scaffolds Within Game Mechanics to Promote Representational Competence. In: Adesope, O.O., Rud, A.G. (eds) Contemporary Technologies in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89680-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89680-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89679-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89680-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics