Industry 4.0 and Paradigm Change in Economics and Business Management

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the impact of change imperative caused by the fourth industrial revolution and new normalities on economy and industrial organizations inside them as well as on society. There is a real threat that the Great Recession from 2008 and counter recession measures exacerbated the global turmoil and diminished capacity to respond adequately on national and company level to new opportunities. Our intention is to offer a conceptual paper. Model of managed capitalism is a reasonable choice for new normalities. Also, we are treating advanced manufacturing as an unavoidable element of new development model for Industry 4.0. We are advocating for “heterodox approach” as a conceptual platform for new economic policies. Also, we will implement this conceptual novelty in case of Serbia giving the framework with concrete vertical and horizontal industrial policies.

Keywords

Industry 4.0 Model of capitalism New normalities Heterodox approach Industrial policy 

References

  1. Blanchard, O., Dell’Ariccia, G., Mauro, P.: Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy (IMF Staff Position Note SPN 10/03). IMF, Washington, DC (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Christensen, C.: The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review, Boston (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, C., Bever, D.V.: The capitalist’s dilemma. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(6), 60–68 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. Đuričin, D.: Escape from Transitionism: What Serbia has Learned from Past Failures and Recommendations for the Future. Serbian Association of Economists and University of Belgrade Faculty of Economics Press, Belgrade (2017)Google Scholar
  5. Đuričin, D., Vuksanović, I.: How macroeconomic policies erode business competitiveness: Serbia’s experience. Zagreb Int. Rev. Econ. Bus. 3(2012), 19–35 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. Đuričin, D., Vuksanović, I.: Reindustrialization strategy of Serbia: how to get it and how to use it. Ekonomikapreduzeća 61(5–6), 289–308 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. Đuričin, D., Vuksanović, I.: Quest for new development model and economic policy platform for Serbia: the role of industrial policy. Ekonomikapreduzeća 62(5–6), 229–238 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. Ghemawat, P.: Globalization in the age of Trump. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95(4), 114–123 (2017)Google Scholar
  9. Kindleberger, Ch.: World Economic Primacy: 1500–1990. Oxford University Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  10. Kohli, H.S. (ed.): The World in 2050: Striving for a More Just, Prosperous, and Harmonious Global Community. Oxford University Press, Washington, DC (2016)Google Scholar
  11. Krugman, P.: The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008. W. W. Norton and Company, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Lim, W.: Joint discovery and upgrading of comparative advantage: lessons from Korea’s development experience. In: Fardoust, S., Kim, Y., Sepulveda, C.P. (eds.) Post Crisis Growth and Development: A Development Agenda for the G-20, pp. 173–237. The World Bank, Washington, DC (2011)Google Scholar
  13. Lin, J.Y.: New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Washington, DC (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin, J.Y., Monga, C.: Growth identification and facilitation: the role of the state in the dynamics of structural change (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5313). The World Bank, Washington, DC (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Minsky, H.: Stabilizing an Unstable Economy. McGraw-Hill, New Jersey (2008)Google Scholar
  16. Moss, D.: A concise guide to macroeconomics: what managers, execute influence is undermining business. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(6), 70–78 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. Mukunda, G.: The price of wall street power. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(6), 70–78 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. Orhangazi, O.: Review of financialization at work: key texts and commentary. J. Econ. Issues XLV(1), 247–249 (2011)Google Scholar
  19. Oxfam international. Oxfam data on global wealth distribution and projections. https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2016-01-18/62-people-own-same-half-world-reveals-oxfam-davos-report
  20. Peppard, J., Ward, J.: The Strategic Management of Information Systems: Building a Digital Strategy. Wiley, Chichester (2016)Google Scholar
  21. Porter, M., Heppelmann, J.: Why every organization needs an augmented reality strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 95(6), 46–57 (2017)Google Scholar
  22. Porter, M., Heppelmann, J.: How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Bus. Rev. 92(11), 64–88 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. Rajan, R.: Fault Lines: How Hidden Fractures Still Threaten the World Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2010)Google Scholar
  24. Rodrik, D.: Industrial policy: don’t ask why, ask how. Middle East Dev. J. 1(1), 1–29 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwab, K.: The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  26. Stiglitz, J., Lin, J.Y. (eds.): The Industrial Policy Revolution I: The Role of Government Beyond Ideology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  27. Stiglitz, J., Lin, J.Y., Monga, C.: The Rejuvenation of Industrial Policy (Policy Research Working Paper 6628). World Bank, Washington (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vuksanović, I.: Industrial policy for Serbia: a matrix approach. Ekonomikapreduzeća 65(1–2), 175–189 (2017)Google Scholar
  29. Wade, R.: Governing the Market. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia

Personalised recommendations