Skip to main content

Integrity in the Workplace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Contextual Character of Moral Integrity

Abstract

This chapter explores the history of moral integrity constructs in the working environment, which commenced in the United States in the beginning of the twentieth century with the aim to optimise the recruitment process and decrease economic losses caused by counterproductive work behaviour. It introduces overt and covert moral integrity assessment tools, discussing their psychometric properties, as well as general utility, acceptability, and limitations given by their mostly commercial purposes, ad hoc created operational definitions, and research bias. Using an example of Robinson and Bennet’s concept of Work Deviance, it shows the methodology of integrity tests construction, which could be eventually seized also in ethical research; it is re-emphasised, though, that the current conceptions defining integrity as adherence to the employer’s rules cannot capture the person’s morality as such, and, moreover, can be utterly confusing should the rules be unethical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alliger, G. M., & Dwight, S. A. (2000). A Metaanalytic Investigation of the Susceptibility of Integrity Tests to Faking and Coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2008). The Prediction of Honesty-Humility-Related Criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of Personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(5), 1216–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, N., Copperwaite, P., & Munro, M. (Ed.). (2008). Dictionary of Unfamiliar Words by Diagram Group. London: Diagram Visual Information Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byle, K. A., & Holtgraves, T. M. (2008). Integrity Testing, Personality, and Design: Interpreting the Personnel Reaction Blank. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22, 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnahan, T., & McFarland, S. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: Could Participant Self-Selection Have Led to the Cruelty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 603–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, R., & Geis, F. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, D. (2009). Doing Well and Good: The Human Face of the New Capitalism. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, B. S., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Schmeelk, K. M. (2006). Integrity Tests and Morality: Associations with Ego Development, Moral Reasoning, and Psychopathic Personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14(1), 82–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne, I., & Bartram, D. (2002). Assessing the Effectivenss of Integrity Tests: A Review. International Journal of Testing, 2(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cribb, A. (2011). Integrity at Work: Managing Routine Moral Stress in Professional Roles. Nursing Philosophy, 12, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vaus, D. A. (2002). Surveys in Social Research. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-Order Factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, D. C. (1984). The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms. Academy of Management Review, 9, 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, D. R. (1980). A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(1), 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R., Grenier, J. R., Guion, R. M., Sechrest, L. B., & Wing, H. (1991). Questionnaires Used in the Prediction of Trustworthiness in Preemployment Selection Decisions. APA Task Force Report. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haney, C., Banks, W. C., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1973). Study of Prisoners and Guards in a Simulated Prison. Naval Research Reviews, 9, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1995). Hogan Personality Inventory Manual (2nd ed.). Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C., & Clark, J. P. (1982). Formal and Informal Social Controls of Employee Deviance. The Sociological Quarterly, 23, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooijberg, R., & Lane, N. (2005). Leader Effectiveness and Integrity: Wishful Thinking? International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 18(1), 59–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W., & Terris, W. (1983). Predicting Employee’s Theft in Home Improvement Centers. Psychological Reports, 52, 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W., & Joy, D. S. (1991). Empirical Investigation of Job Applicants’ Reactions to Taking a Preemployment Honesty Test. In J. W. Jones (Ed.), Preemployment Honesty Testing: Current Research and Future Directions (pp. 121–131). Westport, Canada: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, R. B., & Hogan, R. (2010). How to (and How Not to) Assess the Integrity of Managers. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(4), 216–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. B. (1975). Self-Attitudes and Deviant Behavior. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, C. J., Melchers, K. G., Kleinmann, M., Richter, G. M., & Klehe, U. C. (2006). The Relationship Between the Ability to Identify Evaluation Criteria and Integrity Test Scores. Psychology Science, 48(3), 369–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, W., & Simpson, D. (1992). Employee Substance Abuse and On-The-Job Behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. V. (1985). Defining “Business Ethics”: Like Nailing Jello to a Wall. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 377–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (1993). Do, Honesty’ Tests Really Measure Honesty? Skeptical Inquirer, 18, 3241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S., Andrews, B., & StoneRomero, R. (1994). The Relationship Between a Selfreport Honesty Test and Personality Measures in Prison and College Samples. Journal of Research into Personality, 28, 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. G., Koettel, R. C., & Moore, R. W. (1986). Personality Correlates of a Test of Honesty. Psychological Reports, 59, 1015–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R., & Stewart, R. (1989). Evaluating Employee Integrity: Moral and Methodological Problems. Employees Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K. R. (1993). Honesty in the Workplace. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Gender, Age, and Race Differences on Overt Integrity Tests: Results Across Four Largescale Job Applicant Data Sets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2001). Personality at Work: Criterion-Focused Occupational Personality Scales used in Personnel Selecction. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogen (Eds.), Personality Psychology in the Workplace (pp. 63–92). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. H., & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Integrity Test Validities: Findings and Implications for Personnel Selection and Theories of Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 679–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preiss, M., Mejzlíková, T., Rudá, A., Krámský, D., & Pitáková, J. (2015). Testing the Level of Social Desirability During Job Interview on White-Collar Profession. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. C. (1993). Empiricism in Business Ethics: Suggested Research Directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 585–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, I. T., Baron, H., Gibbons, P., MacIver, R., & Nyfield, G. (2000). Conscientiousness and Managerial Performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 171–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A Typology of Deviant Workplace Behaviors: A Multidimensional Scaling Study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (2000). Development of a Measure of Workplace Deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1987). Preemployment Honesty Testing: Fakability, Reactions of Testtakers & Company Image. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1, 248–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Harris, M. M. (1984). Honesty Testing for Personnel Selection: A Review and Critique. Personnel Psychology, 37(2), 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., Burris, L. R., & Callahan, C. (1989). Integrity Testing for Personnel Selection: An Update. Personnel Psychology, 42, 491–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanek, J. E. (1999). Integrity and Honesty Testing? What Do We Know? How Do We Use It? International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(4), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D. J., Diaz, J., Mineghino, M. E., & Powers, K. (1999). Perceptions of Overt and Personality Based Integrity Tests. Personnel Psychology, 7, 35–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, R. M., & Hakstian, A. R. (1992). An Examination of the Construct Validity of Personality Based and Overt Measures of Integrity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dita Šamánková .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Šamánková, D., Preiss, M., Příhodová, T. (2018). Integrity in the Workplace. In: The Contextual Character of Moral Integrity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89536-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics