Abstract
This chapter summarizes general purposes, the learning settings, and the outcomes of using the STEM as a platform for multidisciplinary learning. By encompassing several disciplines, mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, technology, and engineering, exercising STEM activities posit specific challenges. These challenges are especially visible in high school where students learn contents of STEM subjects in uncorrelated manners. While exercising multidisciplinary STEM activities during extra designed instructional units would be the most efficient, this approach might be problematic to put in practice. Therefore, alternative routes of exercising STEM learning experiences are sought. In this chapter, a framework for an alternative route is suggested and its general theoretical underpinnings discussed. Attention is given to research findings on ways of exercising scientific inquiry and mathematical reasoning in STEM practice. These ideas will also be further discussed in the next chapters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891–1901.
Barrett, B. S., Moran, A. L., & Woods, J. E. (2014). Meteorology meets engineering: An interdisciplinary STEM module for middle and early secondary school students. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(1), 1.
Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735.
Crippen, K. J., & Archambault, L. (2012). Scaffolded inquiry-based instruction with technology: A signature pedagogy for STEM education. Computers in the Schools, 29(1-2), 157–173.
Davison, D. M., Miller, K. W., & Metheny, D. L. (1995). What does the integration of science and mathematics really mean? School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226–230.
Dym, C. (2004). Principles of mathematical modeling. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1.
Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education II. Teaching methods that work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26–39.
Green, M. (2007). Science and engineering degrees: 1966-2004. (NSF 07–307). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11.
Kennedy, T., & Odell, M. (2014). Engaging students in STEM education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246–258.
Koedinger, K. R., Corbett, A. T., & Perfetti, C. (2012). The knowledge‐learning‐instruction framework: Bridging the science‐practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 757–798.
McComas, W. F. (2014). STEM: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In The language of science education (pp. 102–103). Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.
Mentzer, N., Huffman, T., & Thayer, H. (2014). High school student modeling in the engineering design process. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(3), 293–316.
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), 2.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.
Vasquez, J. A., Sneider, C. I., & Comer, M. W. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3-8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. New York: Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sokolowski, A. (2018). STEM Education: A Platform for Multidisciplinary Learning. In: Scientific Inquiry in Mathematics - Theory and Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89524-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89524-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89523-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89524-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)