Abstract
The risk derives from people’s incapacity to foresee the future, and it is acknowledged only when the possible outcomes have a fairly significant degree of uncertainty. Risk cannot be completely eliminated by man when future results are influenced by random factors. However, it lies in its power to reduce the risk to a level that makes it acceptable. Never, in the history of mankind, larger monetary losses have existed. In this case, two external elements influence the process of making economic decisions, with contrasting effects. The first element is an external one and refers to the accuracy of the obtained results, which of course needs to be maximized, because with increasing precision of the results, the probability of an error decreases. The latter factor relates to the timeframe in which economic decision has to be made, which is increasingly transforming into a luxury characteristic afforded by few entities. This scientific approach aims to identify the corporate governance development favorable factors, and it is based on a specific research methodology, consisting of techniques and methods used to achieve the proposed objective. The paper approaches, from an interdisciplinary perspective, the corporate governance efficiency, a relatively new theme compared to other fields, but which presents an ever-increasing interest. The research falls within a positivist scientific endeavor, which is not deprived of some critical and interpretative approaches that aim at explaining different concepts, as well as highlighting the possible solutions for the identified problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Core, et al. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51, 371–406.
Farber, D. B. (2005). Restoring trust after fraud: Does corporate governance matter? The Accounting Review, 80(2), 539–561.
Financial Stability Board (FSB). (2013). Thematic review on risk governance. Accessed at 25.03.2016, from www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_130212.pdf.
Hoag, D. L. (2010). Applied risk management in agriculture. Boca Raton, Florida: Editura CRC Press.
OECD. (2004). Principles of corporate governance. Accessed at 05. 12. 2015. http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3343,en_2649_34813_31530865_1_1_1_1,00.html.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1996). A survey of corporate governance, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambrige MA 02138, April 1996, Accessed at 27.08.2015. http://www.nber.org/papers/w5554.pdf.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2010). În cădere liberă. America, piaţa liberă şi prăbuşirea economiei mondiale., Editura Publică, Bucharest.
Tricker, B. (2011). The cultural dependence of corporate governance. Accessed at 29.08.2015. http://corporategovernanceoup.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/the-cultural-dependence-of-corporate-governance.
Tripa, S. (2006). Guvernanţa corporativă în contextul globalizării. Accessed at 15.05.2016. http://steconomice.uoradea.ro/anale/volume/2006/economie-si-administrarea-afacerilor/72.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Boghean, F., Boghean, C. (2019). Development of Romanian Corporate Governance in Hospitality Industry: Necessity and Favorable Factors. In: Vasile, V. (eds) Caring and Sharing: The Cultural Heritage Environment as an Agent for Change. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89468-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89468-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89467-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89468-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)