Shame and Wrong: Is There a Common Morality Among Young People in France, the UK, the Netherlands, Germany, and the USA?
- 185 Downloads
The chapter analyzes morality as a dependent variable measured by survey responses of some 10,000 children in 7th, 8th, and 9th grade participating in the ISRD3 project in the UK, France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the USA. The chapter empirically describes differences and commonalities in the values and norms of native-born pupils and their migrant counterparts, and it tests the hypothesis that the effect of migration status, parents, school, religion, and friends on morality will be similar in France, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, and the USA. Psychometric analysis of the measures of morality (Pro-Social Values Index and Shame Index) supports cross-national measurement equivalence of the measures. We find broadly similar patterns of morality across these five countries, with some country-level variations in degree of moral consensus across children. Multivariate analysis shows higher levels of morality among girls, lower grades, and those who care about opinion of parents, and teachers, among all five youth samples. Religious affiliation is only of minor importance: Muslim pupils in the Netherlands and the UK score slightly lower on morality scales, but in the US, French, and German samples, this is not the case. The effects of being native-born and first- or second-generation immigrant on morality are weak and inconsistent, suggesting the need for country-specific analysis.
KeywordsMorality Shame Measurement equivalence Religiosity Religion Migrants
The research used in this publication is supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF)—Grant #1419588.
- Alexander, M. (2010). The new Jim Crow. Mass incarceration in the age of color blindness. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
- Bader, C. D., & Finke, R. (2010). What does god require? Understanding religious context and morality (pp. 241–254). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Catalano, R. F., & Hawkins, J. D. (1996). The social development model: A theory of antisocial behavior. In J. D. Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 149–197). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Clay-Warner, J. (2014). Crime and emotions. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (Vol. II, pp. 473–493). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Covaleskie, J. F. (2013). Membership and moral formation: Shame as an educational and social emotion. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
- Enzmann, D. (2017). How to deal with tricky data. ISRD Meeting. Amersfoort, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
- Harkness, S. K., & Hitlin, S. (2014). Morality and emotions. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (Vol. II, pp. 451–471). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Holdcroft, B. (2006). What is Religiosity? Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 10(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
- Lamont, M. (2006). Culture and identity. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 171–186). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Marshall, I. H., & Enzmann, D. (2012). Methodology and design of the ISRD-2 study. In J. Junger-Tas, I. H. Marshall, D. Enzmann, M. Killias, M. Steketee, & B. Gruszczynska (Eds.), The many faces of youth crime. Contrasting theoretical perspectives on juvenile delinquency across countries and cultures (pp. 21–68). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center. (2014). Methodology: global religious diversity index (RDI). Religion and public life Retrieved November 1, 2017, from http://www.pewforum.org/2014/04/04/methodology-2/
- Warwick, D. P., & Osherson, S. (1973). Comparative research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Wikstrom, P. O. H., & Butterworth, D. A. (2006). Adolescent crime. Individual differences and life styles. Devon: Willan.Google Scholar
- Wirth, L. (1945). The problem of minority groups. In R. Linton (Ed.), The science of man in the world crisis (pp. 347–372). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar