Advertisement

Introduction: How Relations to Institutions Shape Youth Integration—Ethno-Religious Minorities, National Contexts and Social Cohesion

  • Sebastian RochéEmail author
  • Mike Hough
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter aims to set out the conceptual framework implicit in the chapters but also provides an introduction to the eight following chapters of the book. Social cohesion depends on a range of societal mechanisms that make individuals feel attached to one another, supportive of public organisations and bonded to a larger imagined community. The book investigates how socialisation of children plays an important role in shaping their norms and value and their social identity and thus generating a sense of attachment to, or detachment from, society. It also tests whether integration is also dependent on how institutions work and therefore on processes or policies that are adopted regarding schooling and policing. Given the importance of migration as a demographic factor and as a political reality and of the ethnic cleavages that in general can be consequent on migration, this book sets out empirical findings comparing migrant and nonmigrant teenagers, focussing on their experience of, and attitudes towards, their integration into society and institutions in France, Germany, the Netherlands, the UK and the USA. Chapters consider orientations to religion, morality, crime and the impact of institutions (schools and police in particular).

Keywords

Social cohesion Integration Migration Ethnicity Religion 

References

  1. Bernstein, S., & Winock, M. (2002). L’invention de la démocratie. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  2. Bradford, B., & Jackson, J. (2017). Police legitimacy among immigrants in Europe: Institutional frames and group position. European Journal of Criminology, 147737081774949.Google Scholar
  3. Crul, M. (2013). Snakes and ladders in educational systems: Access to higher education for second-generation Turks in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(9), 1383–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ennett, S. T., & Bauman, K. E. (1993). Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: A social network analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34, 226–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Entorf, H., & Lauk, M. (2008). Peer effects, social multipliers and migrants at school: An international comparison. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 34(4), 633–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Enzmann, D., Kiviviouri, J., Haen Marshall, I., Steketee, M., Hough, M., & Killias, M. (2018). Young people as offenders and victims of crime—Towards a global perspective: First results from the ISRD3 study. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farren, D., Hough, M., Murray, K., & McVie, S. (2018). Trust in the police and police legitimacy through the eyes of teenagers. In S. Roché & M. Hough (Eds.), Minorities, institutions and social cohesion in Europe and the US: The third international self-report delinquency study. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Felouzis, G., Liot, F., & Perroton, J. (2005). Le ghetto scolaire français. Enquête sur la ségrégation ethnique dans les collèges. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
  9. Fleischmann, F., & Phalet, K. (2017). Religion and National Identification in Europe: Comparing Muslim youth in Belgium, England, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(1), 44–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. FRA (Agence Européenne pour les droits fondamentaux - European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights). (2010). Data in focus report: Police stops and minorities. http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/1132-EU-MIDIS-police.pdf
  11. Green, A., Preston, J., & Janmaat, J. (2006). Education, equality and social cohesion: A comparative analysis. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT (German original published in 1962).Google Scholar
  13. Hagan, J., Shedd, C., & Payne, M. R. (2005). Race, ethnicity, and youth perceptions of criminal injustice. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 381–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffmann, J. P., Erickson, L. D., & Spence, K. R. (2013). Modeling the association between academic achievement and delinquency: An application of interactional theory. Criminology, 51(3), 629–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hough, M., & Mayhew, P. (1985). Taking account of crime: Key findings from the 1984 British Crime Survey. Home Office Research Study No. 85. London: HM Stationery Office. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370817749496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Janmaat, J. G., & Mons, N. (2011). Promoting ethnic tolerance and patriotism: The role of education system characteristics. Comparative Education Review, 55(1), 56–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joppke, C. (2008). Comparative citizenship: A restrictive turn in Europe? Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 2(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Junger-Tas, J., Marshall, I. H., Enzmann, D., Killias, M., Steketee, M., & Gruszczynska, B. (2012). The many faces of youth crime. New York: Springer Science+Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koopmans, R. (2015). Religious fundamentalism and hostility against out-groups: A comparison of Muslims and Christians in Western Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(1), 33–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New Yorks: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller, C. M., Hofmann, V., Fleischli, J., & Studer, F. (2015). Effects of classroom composition on the development of antisocial behavior in lower secondary school. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 26, 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oberwittler, D., & Roché, S. (2018). Police citizen relations across the world. Comparing sources and contexts of trust and legitimacy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Paterson, O. (1997). The ordeal of integration: Progress and resentment in America’s racial crisis. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  26. Roché, S., & Oberwittler, D. (2018). Towards a broader view of police-citizen relations: How societal cleavages and political contexts shape trust and distrust, legitimacy and illegitimacy. In D. Oberwittler & S. Roché (Eds.), Police citizen relations across the world. Comparing sources and contexts of trust and legitimacy (pp. 3–26). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Sato, M. (2017). Police legitimacy and public cooperation: is Japan an outlier in the procedural justice model? In D. Oberwittler & S. Roché (Eds.) Police-citizen relations across the world: comparing sources and contexts of trust and legitimacy. Routledge frontiers of criminal justice. London: Routledge, pp. 108–126.Google Scholar
  28. Tankebe, J. (2008). Colonialism, legitimation, and policing in Ghana. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 36, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Bergen, D., Feddes, A. F., Doosje, B., & Pels, T. V. M. (2015). Collective identity factors and the attitude toward violence in defence of ethnicity or religion among Muslim youth of Turkish and Moroccan Descent. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 47, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wikström, P.-O. H. (2010). Explaining crime as moral actions. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality (pp. 211–239). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre of Scientific Research (CNRS), PACTE, Sciences-Po/Grenoble-Alpes UniversityGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Emeritus Professor, School of Law, BirkbeckUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations