Skip to main content
  • 152 Accesses

Abstract

Even if these words were spoken merely by a parrot, it was a parrot whose longevity – it was purportedly two hundred years old – ensured that it had seen and experienced much; LSE Sociology as the first university-level teacher of its subject in the UK, even if not quite as old as the aforementioned parrot, has also experienced much and, during its existence, it necessarily accumulated more attachments and associations than later university departments teaching the subject. There are a number of institutions, organizations and activities that, in various ways, were associated with Sociology at the School from its early days and onwards. There were also a number of initiatives that arose from LSE Sociology. This chapter gives sketches of the more important examples and considers each in turn. Because these are very disparate in character and associated with different time periods, this assemblage of descriptions has a somewhat mixed character.

‘And the parrot would say, with great rapidity, ‘Pieces of eight! Pieces of eight! Pieces of eight!’

Robert Louis Stevenson, Treasure Island, Chapter 10

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Scot’s other book about LSE (Scot 2005) discusses its particular role in the creation of the discipline of social administration, although it also contains a number of observations about the nature of sociology taught at the School (e.g., pp. 35–8).

  2. 2.

    The winners of the Hobhouse Memorial Prize are enumerated in Table W6.1.

  3. 3.

    Herbert Albert Laurens Fisher (1865–1940) was an historian, a Liberal politician, a former Vice-Chancellor of Sheffield University, a former President of the Board of Education, and in 1929 Warden of New College Oxford. Charles Prestwich Scott (1846–1932) was Editor of the Manchester Guardian from 1872 to 1929. John Lawrence Le Breton Hammond (1872–1949) was a journalist and social historian whose best-known works were written with his wife, Barbara (1873–1961).

  4. 4.

    Notice by PIC Research Secretary Norman Carrier to Committee members, 14 February 1958 (LSE Archives, [Lady] RHYS WILLIAMS/J25/7).

  5. 5.

    Meeting of the Population Investigation Committee, 24 October 1938, Research Secretary’s Report (LSE Archives, LLOYD/14/3).

  6. 6.

    Letter from Ginsberg to Carr-Saunders, 7 March 1940 (LSE Archives, LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTRY/207/A [Box 0273]).

  7. 7.

    See records of Social Research Division, 1940–1942 (LSE Archives, LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTRY/207/A [Box 0273]). Elias had done research work at Heidelberg between 1924 and 1930, was an Assistant Lecturer in Sociology at Frankfurt am Main from 1930 to 1933, was attached to the École Normale Supérieure in Paris from 1934 to 1936, and then did research work in London from 1936 to 1939, before his first research appointment at the School in 1939. By then he already had an impressive list of publications, his Habilitation thesis being on the sociology of kingship and of the court nobility and his period in France leading to a publication on the expulsion of the Huguenots from France.

  8. 8.

    Annual Report of the Social Research Division for 1940, Professorial Council Agenda 22 January 1941, Item 2 (LSE Archives, LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTRY/207/A [Box 0273]).

  9. 9.

    Letter from Carr-Saunders to the Principal of the University of London, 1 August 1947 (LSE Archives/LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTRY/207/3/A [Box 0275].

  10. 10.

    Letter from George North to Carr-Saunders, 13 December 1947, Ibid.

  11. 11.

    See Chapter 9 for a detailed discussion of this book and its contents.

  12. 12.

    Even so, Floud says in her Acknowledgments (p. vii) that the research was conducted under the auspices of the Glass-invented title of the Department of Sociological and Demographic Research rather than the Sociological Research Unit.

  13. 13.

    Letter from H. C. Scriven to Claus Moser, 18 October 1956 (LSE Archives, LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTYRY/207/F).

  14. 14.

    Memorandum to Research Committee, signed S.C., 24 May 1961 (LSE Archives, LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTRY/13/251/9 [Box 23].

  15. 15.

    Letter from Marion Horn to Thomas Bottomore, 28 October 1963, LSE Archives, LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTRY/207/G [Box 0274].

  16. 16.

    Letter from Marion Horn to John Westergaard, 5 October 1965, LSE Archives, LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTRY/207/H [Box 0274].

  17. 17.

    See LSE Calendar, 1961–62, p. 475, for a description.

  18. 18.

    Annual Report of the Unit for year ending 31 July 1966, LSE Archives, LSE/CENTRAL FILING REGISTRY/13/251/9 [Box 23]. Despite this promise, it is unclear whether anything from this study was ever actually published as the lists of staff publications in the Calendars of the following years to 1972 contain no apparent examples. The work by Kelsall and colleagues in 1970 was conducted independently on a later cohort of graduates, and Little and Westergaard (1964) included some data from Kelsall’s 1957 study in their review article but nothing on the follow-up data. Even a study (Phillips 1969) that one might have expected to refer to these follow-up data does not.

References

  • Ahmad, S. P. (1987). Institutions and the growth of knowledge: the Rockefeller Foundation’s influence on the social sciences between the wars. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Science and Technology Policy, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1985). The development of sociology and of empirical social research in Britain. In M. Bulmer (Ed.), Essays on the history of British sociological research (pp. 3–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M., & Bulmer, J. (1981). Philanthropy and social sciences in the 1920s: Beardsley Ruml and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial, 1922–29. Minerva, 19(3), 347–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Saunders, A. M., Jones, D. C., & Moser, C. A. (1958). A survey of social conditions in England and Wales: as illustrated by statistics. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kadt, E. J. (1964). Locating minority group members: two British surveys of Jewish university students. Jewish Journal of Sociology, 6(1), 30–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1950). Studies in the genesis of the naval profession. British Journal of Sociology, 1(4), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermisch, J. (2005). Demography’s British history and its relation to sociology. In A. H. Halsey & W. G. Runciman (Eds.), British sociology seen from without and within (pp. 94–103). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. (1980). American philanthropy and the social sciences in Britain, 1919–1939: the reproduction of a conservative ideology. Sociological Review, 28(2), 277–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, D. (1983). The role of philanthropic foundations in the reproduction and production of hegemony: Rockefeller Foundation and the social sciences. Sociology, 17(2), 206–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Floud, J. E. (1954). The educational experience of the adult population of England and Wales as at July 1949. In D. V. Glass (Ed.), Social mobility in Britain (pp. 98–140). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floud, J. E. (Ed.), Halsey, A. H., & Martin, F. M. (1956). Social class and educational opportunity. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D. V. (1940). Population: policies and movements in Europe. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D. V. (Ed.). (1954). Social mobility in Britain. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grebenik, E. (1991). Demographic research in Britain, 1936–1986. Population Studies, 45, Population Research in Britain Supplement, 3–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttsman, W. L. (1963). The British political elite. First ed.; London: MacGibbon & Kee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. [R.], & Jones, D. C. (1950). Social grading of occupations. British Journal of Sociology, 1(1), 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C. (1969). ‘Reason’ and ‘reasonableness’ in seventeenth-century England. British Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 235–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., & Jones, D. C. (1950). Social class of Cambridge University alumni of the 18th and 19th centuries. British Journal of Sociology, 1(2), 93–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall, R. K. (1955). Higher civil servants in Britain: from 1870 to the present day. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall, R. K. (1957). Report on an inquiry into applications for admission to universities: commissioned by the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals of the Universities of the United Kingdom. London: Association of the Universities of the British Commonwealth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelsall, R. K., Poole, A., & Kuhn, A. (1970). Six years after: first report on a national follow-up survey of ten thousand graduates of British universities in 1960. Sheffield: Higher Education Research Unit, Department of Sociological Studies, Sheffield University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, C. M. (1988). The Population Investigation Committee: a concise history to mark its fiftieth anniversary. London: Population Investigation Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, A., & Westergaard, J. (1964). The trend of class differentials in educational opportunity in England and Wales. British Journal of Sociology, 15(4), 301–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, D. (1958) The blackcoated worker: a study in class consciousness. London: George Allen & Unwin. Second edition published by Clarendon Press in 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • LSE [London School of Economics and Political Science]. (1962). Hobhouse Memorial Lectures, 1951–1960. London: Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, R. T., & Silver, A. (1968). Angels in marble: working class Conservatives in urban England. London: Heinemann Educational.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millerson, G. (1964). The qualifying associations: a study in professionalization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newfield, J. G. H. (1963). Some factors related to the academic performance of British university students. Sociological Review Monograph, 7(1), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. M. (1969). Changes in subject choice at school and university. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scot, M. (2005). La London School of Economics et le Welfare State: science et politique, 1940–1979. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scot, M. (2011). La London School of Economics and Political Science, 1895–2010: internationalisation universitaire et circulation des savoirs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropp, A. (1957). The school teachers: the growth of the teaching profession in England and Wales from 1800 to the present day. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, G. C. (1910). The tribe, and intertribal relations in Australia. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, B. R. (1985). Morality in the evolution of the modern social system. British Journal of Sociology, 36(3), 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubrzycki, J. (1956). Polish immigrants in Britain: a study of adjustment. London: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher T. Husbands .

Electronic Supplementary Material

Table W8.1

Identified Hobhouse Memorial Trust Lecturers and Lecture Titles, 1930 to 2011 (DOCX 15 kb)

Table W8.2

Identified David Glass Memorial Lecturers on Social Trends, 1980 to 2012 (DOCX 12 kb)

Table W8.3

Identified Auguste Comte Memorial Trust Lecturers, 1971 to 2017 (DOCX 13 kb)

Appendix 1: ‘… et cetera’

Appendix 1: ‘… et cetera’

Over a period of more than a hundred years, LSE Sociology and its members will naturally have been involved in, or have participated in, a large number of activities and organizations peripheral to, but associated with, the Department or the discipline. This chapter has focused only on those that were seen as most important or that left some longer-term effect on the Department. However, several of the more peripheral ones also deserve at least a mention.

  1. (i)

    The Sociological Society

The Sociological Society, founded in 1903 with James Martin White as its Treasurer for more than twenty years, had important early links with sociology teachers at LSE, who were all members at its outset. The initial Sociological Papers and then the Sociological Review published material by Westermarck and Hobhouse , though there was a later froideur and Hobhouse for one withdrew from this initiative. Years later, the British Sociological Association, founded in 1951 with the involvement of several LSE staff, was also closely associated with the Department in its early days. It retained an office based at LSE into the early 1990s before a final departure and its move to Durham when Anne Dix retired.

  1. (ii)

    The Board of Studies in Sociology of the University of London

LSE, as a constituent college of the University of London, was for most of its history subject to the latter’s authority over its curriculum and even the titles of its doctoral theses. The body handling this authority was the Board of Studies in Sociology and, in the early years, this was a large and variegated body comprising rather few sociologists and a good many other types of member, whose status for membership might be considered questionable. Some members were academics of cognate or near-cognate subjects but others are more to be regarded as outsiders, including James Martin White as a financial sponsor of the University of London and Victor Branford representing the Sociological Society.

  1. (iii)

    The Sociology Club

In 1923 Sociology established a Sociology Club, modelled on the Economic Club founded in the 1890s. In the early days the Sociology Club held regular evening seminars with paper presentations by local luminaries, preceded by dinner, and it continued, albeit increasingly informally and with fewer meetings, into the 1960s. Its membership was originally surprisingly restricted, with new admissions arising only from members leaving, but membership terms were later relaxed, though never to the extent of admitting students.

  1. (iv)

    University of London’s External and Extension Programmes

Sociology had other connections to the wider University of London, in particular the participation of staff members in its External and Extension programmes. The former involved the oversight of sociology teaching at affiliated institutions in this country and abroad; indeed, as revealed in Chapter 4, LSE Sociology had sole responsibility for preparing the teachers’ guide for the BA/BSc sociology external degree of the University of London. The latter programme involved doing often short-term evening teaching in the further parts of the metropolis.

  1. (v)

    Publishing Initiatives Associated with LSE Sociology

Besides the Sociological Papers and the Sociological Review, LSE Sociology, largely with the support of James Martin White, was associated with various early publishing initiatives. With the benefit of White’s money, such works as Wheeler’s The tribe, and interracial relations in Australia (Wheeler 1910) were published. In the post-war period the Department was associated with the European Journal of Sociology, from the mid-1960s, with Bottomore and Gellner on the editorial board, until the mid-1980s. Also, of course, there was the British Journal of Sociology, founded by the Department in 1950.

  1. (vi)

    Minor Lecture Series

Above was discussed the legacy of Leonard Hobhouse in the Hobhouse Memorial Trust, which funded the annual Hobhouse Memorial Prize but also a series of lectures, initially held annually in a circulating network of London colleges, including LSE. However, there were other, less established lecture series, such as the Auguste Comte Memorial Trust lectures and later the David Glass Lectures on Social Trends (which briefly also included the name of Ruth Glass shortly after her death, though that practice later lapsed). Not all the lecturers of both series have been identified, and those known are listed in Tables W8.2 and W8.3.

  1. (vii)

    Centre for Sociological Research

In this chapter above were discussed the Sociological Research Unit and the Social Research Division but, less known about was an attempt initially by Gellner in 1964 to establish a unit to be called the Centre for Sociological Research, funded by the School. Various members of the Department were involved in seeking to take this forward inside the School through the School’s Research Committee, but the initiative faltered, partly because the School administration was suspicious throughout, seeing it as an attempt at an inappropriate grab for School resources beyond those available in the Social Research Division. Perhaps Gellner was seeking a degree of personal removal from the Department while MacRae was convener.

  1. (viii)

    Jewish Journal of Sociology and a Research Studentship in Jewish Sociology

A more recherché issue associated with LSE Sociology was the Jewish Journal of Sociology, associated because of Ginsberg , who had co-founded it Maurice Freedman in 1959. Because of that link, the School was requested by Ginsberg in 1963 to administer a Research Studentship in Jewish Sociology, funded by the World Jewish Congress. This was agreed, although the School was apparently nervous about it and wanted the appointment of the Fellow to be advertised as open to all, lest the scheme should attract criticism for being ethnically or religiously exclusive. As it was, an appointment was made, and research was done and published, though no later appointments of such restricted character have been identified.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Husbands, C.T. (2019). LSE Sociology and Its Associated Institutions. In: Sociology at the London School of Economics and Political Science, 1904–2015. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89450-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89450-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89449-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89450-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics