Advertisement

Lost Circulation Materials

  • Yongcun Feng
  • K. E. Gray
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Petroleum Geoscience & Engineering book series (BRIEFSPGE)

Abstract

Numerous LCMs have been proposed for curing lost circulation. However, due to the complexity of formation properties and fluid loss mechanisms, there is not a universal LCM suitable to all types of losses. The selection of LCMs is highly dependent on the formation types, fluid loss mechanisms (e.g. loss into pores, natural fractures, induced fractures, and vugs), and the loss severity. This chapter gives a brief overview of the LCMs that can be used to mitigate fluid losses in high-permeability formations, low-permeability shales, and vugular/fractured carbonates.

References

  1. 1.
    Canson BE (1985) Lost circulation treatments for naturally fractured, vugular, or cavernous formations. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, 5–8 March, New Orleans, Louisiana. https://doi.org/10.2118/13440-MS
  2. 2.
    White RJ (1956) Lost-circulation materials and their evaluation. In: Drilling and production practice. Am Pet Inst, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lavrov A (2016) Lost circulation: mechanisms and solutions, 1st edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alsaba M, Nygaard R, Hareland G, Contreras O (2014) Review of lost circulation materials and treatments with an updated classification. In: AADE national technical conference and exhibition, Houston, pp 15–16Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nayberg TM (1987) Laboratory study of lost circulation materials for use in both oil-based and water-based drilling muds. SPE Drilling Eng 2(03):229–236. https://doi.org/10.2118/14723-PACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Whitfill DL, Hemphill T (2003) All lost-circulation materials and systems are not created equal. In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 5–8 October, Denver, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2118/84319-MS
  7. 7.
    Growcock FB, Kaageson-Loe N, Friedheim J, Sanders MW, Bruton J (2009) Wellbore stability, stabilization and strengthening. In: Offshore mediterranean conference and exhibition, 25–27 March, Ravenna, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nelson EB (1990) Well cementing, vol 28. NewnesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luzardo J et al (2015) Alternative lost circulation material for depleted reservoirs. In: OTC Brasil, 27–29 October, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. https://doi.org/10.4043/26188-MS
  10. 10.
    Alberty MW, McLean MR (2004) A physical model for stress cages. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 26–29 September, Houston, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/90493-MS
  11. 11.
    Aston MS, Alberty MW, Duncum SD, Bruton JR, Friedheim JE, Sanders MW (2007) A new treatment for wellbore strengthening in shale. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 11–14 November, Anaheim, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/110713-MS
  12. 12.
    Feng Y, Jones JF, Gray KE (2016) A review on fracture-initiation and -propagation pressures for lost circulation and wellbore strengthening. SPE Drilling Completion 31(02):134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feng Y, Gray KE (2017) Review of fundamental studies on lost circulation and wellbore strengthening. J Petrol Sci Eng 152:511–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Savari S, Whitfill DL, Kumar A (2012) Resilient lost circulation material (LCM): a significant factor in effective wellbore strengthening. In SPE deepwater drilling and completions conference, 20–21 June, Galveston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/153154-MS
  15. 15.
    Whitfill D (2008) Lost circulation material selection, particle size distribution and fracture modeling with fracture simulation software. In: IADC/SPE Asia Pacific drilling technology conference and exhibition, 25–27 August, Jakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2118/115039-MS
  16. 16.
    Fekete PO, Dosunmu A, Kuerunwa A, Ekeinde EB, Chimaroke A, Baridor OS (2013) Wellbore stability management in depleted and low pressure reservoirs. In: SPE Nigeria annual international conference and exhibition, 5–7 August, Lagos, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.2118/167543-MS
  17. 17.
    Sanders MW, Scorsone JT, Friedheim JE (2010) High-fluid-loss, high-strength lost circulation treatments. In: SPE deepwater drilling and completions conference, 5–6 October, Galveston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/135472-MS
  18. 18.
    Wang H, Sweatman RE, Engelman RE, Deeg WF, Whitfill DL (2005) The key to successfully applying today’s lost circulation solutions. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 9–12 October, Dallas, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/95895-MS
  19. 19.
    Feng Y, Gray KE (2018) Modeling Lost circulation through drilling-induced fractures. SPE J 23(01):205–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dick MA, Heinz TJ, Svoboda CF, Aston M (2000) Optimizing the selection of bridging particles for reservoir drilling fluids. In: SPE international symposium on formation damage control, 23–24 February, Lafayette, Louisiana. https://doi.org/10.2118/58793-MS
  21. 21.
    Kageson-Loe NM et al (2009) Particulate-based loss-prevention material–the secrets of fracture sealing revealed! SPE Drilling Completion 24(04):581–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Savari S, Whitfill DL (2015) Managing losses in naturally fractured formations: sometimes nano is too small. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference and exhibition, 17–19 March, London, England, UK. https://doi.org/10.2118/173062-MS
  23. 23.
    Fidan E, Babadagli T, Kuru E (2004) Use of cement as lost-circulation material: best practices. In: Canadian international petroleum conference, 8–10 June, Calgary, Alberta. https://doi.org/10.2118/2004-090
  24. 24.
    Lecolier E, Herzhaft B, Rousseau L, Neau L, Quillien B, Kieffer J (2005) Development of a nanocomposite gel for lost circulation treatment. In: SPE European formation damage conference, 25–27 May, Sheveningen, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/94686-MS
  25. 25.
    Wang H et al (2008) Best practice in understanding and managing lost circulation challenges. SPE Drilling Completion 23(02):168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Droger N et al (2014) Degradable fiber Pill for lost circulation in fractured reservoir sections. In: IADC/SPE drilling conference and exhibition, 4–6 March, Fort Worth, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/168024-MS
  27. 27.
    Ghassemzadeh J (2013) Lost circulation material for oilfield use. U.S. Patent No. 8,404,622Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Halliday WS, Clapper DK, Jarrett M, Carr M (2004) Acid soluble, high fluid loss pill for lost circulation. U.S. Patent No. 6,790,812Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Al-yami AS, Al-Ateeq A, Wagle VB, Alabdullatif ZA, Qahtani M (2014) New developed acid soluble cement and sodium silicate gel to cure lost circulation zones. In: Abu Dhabi international petroleum exhibition and conference, 10–13 November, Abu Dhabi, UAE. https://doi.org/10.2118/172020-MS
  30. 30.
    Vinson EF, Totten PL, Middaugh RL (1992) Acid removable cement system helps lost circulation in productive zones. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, 18–21 February, New Orleans, Louisiana. https://doi.org/10.2118/23929-MS
  31. 31.
    Suyan KM, Sharma V, Jain VK (2009) An innovative material for severe lost circulation control in depleted formations. In: Middle East drilling technology conference & exhibition, 26–28 October, Manama, Bahrain. https://doi.org/10.2118/125693-MS
  32. 32.
    Feng Y, Jones JF, Gray KE (2015) Pump-in and flow-back test for determination of fracture parameters and in-situ stresses. In: AADE 2015 national technical conference and exhibition, 8–9 April, San Antonio, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dupriest FE (2005) Fracture closure stress (FCS) and lost returns practices. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, 23–25 February, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/92192-MS
  34. 34.
    Fredrich JT, Engler BP, Smith JA, Onyia EC, Tolman D (2007) Pre-drill estimation of sub-salt fracture gradient: analysis of the Spa prospect to validate non-linear finite element stress analyses. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, 20–22 February, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/105763-MS
  35. 35.
    Power D, Ivan CD, Brooks SW (2003) The top 10 lost circulation concerns in deepwater drilling. In: SPE Latin American and Caribbean petroleum engineering conference, 27–30 April, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. https://doi.org/10.2118/81133-MS
  36. 36.
    Willson SM, Fredrich JT (2005) Geomechanics considerations for through-and near-salt well design. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 9–12 October, Dallas, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/95621-MS
  37. 37.
    Caughron DE et al (2002) Unique crosslinking pill in tandem with fracture prediction model cures circulation losses in deepwater Gulf of Mexico. In: IADC/SPE drilling conference, 26–28 February, Dallas, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/74518-MS
  38. 38.
    Ferras M, Galal M, Power D (2002) Lost circulation solutions for severe sub-salt thief zones. In: AADE 2002 Technology Conference Drilling & Completion Fluids and Waste Management, 2–3 April, Houston, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Contreras O, Hareland G, Husein M, Nygaard R, Al-saba MT (2014) Experimental investigation on wellbore strengthening in shales by means of nanoparticle-based drilling fluids. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 27–29 October, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/170589-MS
  40. 40.
    Friedheim JE, Young S, De Stefano G, Lee J, Guo Q (2012) Nanotechnology for oilfield applications-hype or reality? In: SPE international oilfield nanotechnology conference and exhibition, 12–14 June, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/157032-MS
  41. 41.
    Hoelscher KP, De Stefano G, Riley M, Young S (2012) Application of nanotechnology in drilling fluids. In: SPE international oilfield nanotechnology conference and exhibition, 12–14 June, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/157031-MS
  42. 42.
    Li G, Zhang J, Hou Y (2012) Nanotechnology to improve sealing ability of drilling fluids for shale with micro-cracks during drilling. In: SPE international oilfield nanotechnology conference and exhibition, 12–14 June, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/156997-MS
  43. 43.
    Nwaoji CO (2012) Wellbore strengthening- nano-particle drilling fluid experimental design using hydraulic fracture apparatus. Thesis, University of CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kumar A, Savari S, Whitfill D, Jamison D (2011) Application of fiber laden pill for controlling lost circulation in natural fractures. In: AADE 2011 national technical conference and exhibition, 12–14 April, Houston, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Petroleum and Geosystems EngineeringThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations