Skip to main content

Lost Circulation Materials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lost Circulation and Wellbore Strengthening

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Petroleum Geoscience & Engineering ((BRIEFSPGE))

Abstract

Numerous LCMs have been proposed for curing lost circulation. However, due to the complexity of formation properties and fluid loss mechanisms, there is not a universal LCM suitable to all types of losses. The selection of LCMs is highly dependent on the formation types, fluid loss mechanisms (e.g. loss into pores, natural fractures, induced fractures, and vugs), and the loss severity. This chapter gives a brief overview of the LCMs that can be used to mitigate fluid losses in high-permeability formations, low-permeability shales, and vugular/fractured carbonates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Canson BE (1985) Lost circulation treatments for naturally fractured, vugular, or cavernous formations. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, 5–8 March, New Orleans, Louisiana. https://doi.org/10.2118/13440-MS

  2. White RJ (1956) Lost-circulation materials and their evaluation. In: Drilling and production practice. Am Pet Inst, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lavrov A (2016) Lost circulation: mechanisms and solutions, 1st edn. Gulf Professional Publishing, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. Alsaba M, Nygaard R, Hareland G, Contreras O (2014) Review of lost circulation materials and treatments with an updated classification. In: AADE national technical conference and exhibition, Houston, pp 15–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nayberg TM (1987) Laboratory study of lost circulation materials for use in both oil-based and water-based drilling muds. SPE Drilling Eng 2(03):229–236. https://doi.org/10.2118/14723-PA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Whitfill DL, Hemphill T (2003) All lost-circulation materials and systems are not created equal. In SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 5–8 October, Denver, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2118/84319-MS

  7. Growcock FB, Kaageson-Loe N, Friedheim J, Sanders MW, Bruton J (2009) Wellbore stability, stabilization and strengthening. In: Offshore mediterranean conference and exhibition, 25–27 March, Ravenna, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson EB (1990) Well cementing, vol 28. Newnes

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luzardo J et al (2015) Alternative lost circulation material for depleted reservoirs. In: OTC Brasil, 27–29 October, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. https://doi.org/10.4043/26188-MS

  10. Alberty MW, McLean MR (2004) A physical model for stress cages. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 26–29 September, Houston, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/90493-MS

  11. Aston MS, Alberty MW, Duncum SD, Bruton JR, Friedheim JE, Sanders MW (2007) A new treatment for wellbore strengthening in shale. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 11–14 November, Anaheim, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/110713-MS

  12. Feng Y, Jones JF, Gray KE (2016) A review on fracture-initiation and -propagation pressures for lost circulation and wellbore strengthening. SPE Drilling Completion 31(02):134–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng Y, Gray KE (2017) Review of fundamental studies on lost circulation and wellbore strengthening. J Petrol Sci Eng 152:511–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Savari S, Whitfill DL, Kumar A (2012) Resilient lost circulation material (LCM): a significant factor in effective wellbore strengthening. In SPE deepwater drilling and completions conference, 20–21 June, Galveston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/153154-MS

  15. Whitfill D (2008) Lost circulation material selection, particle size distribution and fracture modeling with fracture simulation software. In: IADC/SPE Asia Pacific drilling technology conference and exhibition, 25–27 August, Jakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2118/115039-MS

  16. Fekete PO, Dosunmu A, Kuerunwa A, Ekeinde EB, Chimaroke A, Baridor OS (2013) Wellbore stability management in depleted and low pressure reservoirs. In: SPE Nigeria annual international conference and exhibition, 5–7 August, Lagos, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.2118/167543-MS

  17. Sanders MW, Scorsone JT, Friedheim JE (2010) High-fluid-loss, high-strength lost circulation treatments. In: SPE deepwater drilling and completions conference, 5–6 October, Galveston, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/135472-MS

  18. Wang H, Sweatman RE, Engelman RE, Deeg WF, Whitfill DL (2005) The key to successfully applying today’s lost circulation solutions. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 9–12 October, Dallas, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/95895-MS

  19. Feng Y, Gray KE (2018) Modeling Lost circulation through drilling-induced fractures. SPE J 23(01):205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dick MA, Heinz TJ, Svoboda CF, Aston M (2000) Optimizing the selection of bridging particles for reservoir drilling fluids. In: SPE international symposium on formation damage control, 23–24 February, Lafayette, Louisiana. https://doi.org/10.2118/58793-MS

  21. Kageson-Loe NM et al (2009) Particulate-based loss-prevention material–the secrets of fracture sealing revealed! SPE Drilling Completion 24(04):581–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Savari S, Whitfill DL (2015) Managing losses in naturally fractured formations: sometimes nano is too small. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference and exhibition, 17–19 March, London, England, UK. https://doi.org/10.2118/173062-MS

  23. Fidan E, Babadagli T, Kuru E (2004) Use of cement as lost-circulation material: best practices. In: Canadian international petroleum conference, 8–10 June, Calgary, Alberta. https://doi.org/10.2118/2004-090

  24. Lecolier E, Herzhaft B, Rousseau L, Neau L, Quillien B, Kieffer J (2005) Development of a nanocomposite gel for lost circulation treatment. In: SPE European formation damage conference, 25–27 May, Sheveningen, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/94686-MS

  25. Wang H et al (2008) Best practice in understanding and managing lost circulation challenges. SPE Drilling Completion 23(02):168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Droger N et al (2014) Degradable fiber Pill for lost circulation in fractured reservoir sections. In: IADC/SPE drilling conference and exhibition, 4–6 March, Fort Worth, Texas, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/168024-MS

  27. Ghassemzadeh J (2013) Lost circulation material for oilfield use. U.S. Patent No. 8,404,622

    Google Scholar 

  28. Halliday WS, Clapper DK, Jarrett M, Carr M (2004) Acid soluble, high fluid loss pill for lost circulation. U.S. Patent No. 6,790,812

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-yami AS, Al-Ateeq A, Wagle VB, Alabdullatif ZA, Qahtani M (2014) New developed acid soluble cement and sodium silicate gel to cure lost circulation zones. In: Abu Dhabi international petroleum exhibition and conference, 10–13 November, Abu Dhabi, UAE. https://doi.org/10.2118/172020-MS

  30. Vinson EF, Totten PL, Middaugh RL (1992) Acid removable cement system helps lost circulation in productive zones. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, 18–21 February, New Orleans, Louisiana. https://doi.org/10.2118/23929-MS

  31. Suyan KM, Sharma V, Jain VK (2009) An innovative material for severe lost circulation control in depleted formations. In: Middle East drilling technology conference & exhibition, 26–28 October, Manama, Bahrain. https://doi.org/10.2118/125693-MS

  32. Feng Y, Jones JF, Gray KE (2015) Pump-in and flow-back test for determination of fracture parameters and in-situ stresses. In: AADE 2015 national technical conference and exhibition, 8–9 April, San Antonio, Texas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dupriest FE (2005) Fracture closure stress (FCS) and lost returns practices. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, 23–25 February, Amsterdam, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/92192-MS

  34. Fredrich JT, Engler BP, Smith JA, Onyia EC, Tolman D (2007) Pre-drill estimation of sub-salt fracture gradient: analysis of the Spa prospect to validate non-linear finite element stress analyses. In: SPE/IADC drilling conference, 20–22 February, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/105763-MS

  35. Power D, Ivan CD, Brooks SW (2003) The top 10 lost circulation concerns in deepwater drilling. In: SPE Latin American and Caribbean petroleum engineering conference, 27–30 April, Port-of-Spain, Trinidad and Tobago. https://doi.org/10.2118/81133-MS

  36. Willson SM, Fredrich JT (2005) Geomechanics considerations for through-and near-salt well design. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 9–12 October, Dallas, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/95621-MS

  37. Caughron DE et al (2002) Unique crosslinking pill in tandem with fracture prediction model cures circulation losses in deepwater Gulf of Mexico. In: IADC/SPE drilling conference, 26–28 February, Dallas, Texas. https://doi.org/10.2118/74518-MS

  38. Ferras M, Galal M, Power D (2002) Lost circulation solutions for severe sub-salt thief zones. In: AADE 2002 Technology Conference Drilling & Completion Fluids and Waste Management, 2–3 April, Houston, Texas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  39. Contreras O, Hareland G, Husein M, Nygaard R, Al-saba MT (2014) Experimental investigation on wellbore strengthening in shales by means of nanoparticle-based drilling fluids. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 27–29 October, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/170589-MS

  40. Friedheim JE, Young S, De Stefano G, Lee J, Guo Q (2012) Nanotechnology for oilfield applications-hype or reality? In: SPE international oilfield nanotechnology conference and exhibition, 12–14 June, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/157032-MS

  41. Hoelscher KP, De Stefano G, Riley M, Young S (2012) Application of nanotechnology in drilling fluids. In: SPE international oilfield nanotechnology conference and exhibition, 12–14 June, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/157031-MS

  42. Li G, Zhang J, Hou Y (2012) Nanotechnology to improve sealing ability of drilling fluids for shale with micro-cracks during drilling. In: SPE international oilfield nanotechnology conference and exhibition, 12–14 June, Noordwijk, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2118/156997-MS

  43. Nwaoji CO (2012) Wellbore strengthening- nano-particle drilling fluid experimental design using hydraulic fracture apparatus. Thesis, University of Calgary

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kumar A, Savari S, Whitfill D, Jamison D (2011) Application of fiber laden pill for controlling lost circulation in natural fractures. In: AADE 2011 national technical conference and exhibition, 12–14 April, Houston, Texas, USA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongcun Feng .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Feng, Y., Gray, K.E. (2018). Lost Circulation Materials. In: Lost Circulation and Wellbore Strengthening. SpringerBriefs in Petroleum Geoscience & Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89435-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89435-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89434-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89435-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics