Skip to main content

The Girling of Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Managed Body
  • 1132 Accesses

Abstract

In this first of two contextualizing chapters, I examine what Lyndsay Hayhurst dubbed the “girling of development” or the strategic emphasis on girls’ as agents of economic growth that serves as the potent rationale for Menstrual Hygiene Management. Through this lens, providing girls with access to menstrual care materials and menstrual health education is the key that unlocks girls’ potential. I trace a brief history of the girling of development trend, including the Nike Foundation’s introduction of “The Girl Effect” in 2009 followed by a discussion of feminist critiques of this approach. While centering on girls is a step forward, critics argue, the “the turn toward the girl” is often reductive, superficial, and potentially dangerous in the ways it insufficiently addresses the complicated web of factors that contribute to girls’ vulnerabilities and positions girls as economic resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As of this writing, the future of Let Girls Learn under the Trump administration is uncertain. Internal documents suggest a shuttering of the program, but White House spokespeople claim that the program remains intact (Liptak 2017; Shugerman 2017).

  2. 2.

    In 2011, UNIFEM was folded into UN Women.

  3. 3.

    These face-to-face fundraisers are typically employees of an agency such as Public Outreach who canvass for a number of organizations.

  4. 4.

    I can’t resist pointing out the egregious deployment of the “other” in this moment of the video. When Ruth states, “Of course this is not my story…,” she taps into the Western assumptions about life in the Global South as starkly contrasted with those of the Global North. “Of course” as a well-groomed, white woman, ostensibly American and privileged, she has not fallen prey to the horrid chain of events she describes. I will explore this North-South bifurcation threaded through MHM discourse in Chap. 5.

  5. 5.

    I will address this statistic’s curious ubiquity in some detail in Chap. 4.

  6. 6.

    As development professionals know, Sachs’ view is controversial. Pointed critiques include William Easterly’s The White Man’s Burden: Why the West’s Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good (2007) and Nina Munk’s The Idealist: Jeffrey Sachs and the Quest to End Poverty (2013).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bobel, C. (2019). The Girling of Development. In: The Managed Body. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89414-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89414-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89413-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89414-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics