Skip to main content

Redefine the Problem: The Design Thinking Path

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Cracked it!

Abstract

The design thinking path to problem solving is appropriate whenever the problem is human centered, complex, and too poorly understood to be defined using the analytical TOSCA approach. In design thinking, the problem owner you consider is the user of the solution you are trying to design. Typically, this is a product or service, but the design thinking path can be used to create a strategy, an organization, and so on. To state the problem, a designer will first empathize with users through observation, empathy and immersion, in order to gain insights into the problems they face and the way they experience them. It will then become possible to define the problem with a set of design imperatives and a how-might-we design goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Sawyer, R. (2006). Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  2. 2.

    Brown , T. (2009). Change by Design. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

  3. 3.

    Beckman, S.L., & Barry, M. (2007). Innovation as a Learning Process: Embedding Design Thinking, California Management Review, 50(1), 25–56.

  4. 4.

    Grant, A.M., & Berry, J.W. (2011). The Necessity of Others Is the Mother of Invention: Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 54(10), 73–96.

  5. 5.

    Leonard, D., & Rayport, J.F. (1997). Spark Innovation Through Empathic Design. Harvard Business Review, November–December issue, 102–113.

  6. 6.

    Hammersley, M. (2007). Ethnography. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

  7. 7.

    Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). Telling More Than We Can Know: Verbal Reports on Mental Processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.

  8. 8.

    Brown , T. (2009). Change by Design. New York: HarperCollins Publishers. p. 44.

  9. 9.

    Csazar, F.A., & Levinthal, D.A. (2016). Mental Representation and the Discovery of New Strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 37(10), 2031–2049.

  10. 10.

    Avery, J., & Norton, M.I. (2014). Learning from Extreme Consumers. Harvard Business School Industry and Background Note. Harvard Business School Publishing.

  11. 11.

    Robertson, D.C., & Breen, B. (2013). Brick by Brick: How LEGO Rewrote the Rules of Innovation and Conquered the Global Toy Industry. New York: Crown Business.

    Madberg, C., & Rasmussen, M.B. (2014). An Anthropologist Walks into a Bar … Harvard Business Review, 92(3), 80–88.

  12. 12.

    Lipshtitz, R., & Waingortan, M. (1995). Getting out of Ruts: A Laboratory Study of Cognitive Model Reframing. Journal of Creative Behavior, 29(3), 151–172.

    Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  13. 13.

    Hasso Plattner Institute of Design, Stanford University (2009). An Introduction to Design Thinking Process Guide.

  14. 14.

    Conifer Research. (2002). How to Find Buried Treasure Using Experience Maps.

  15. 15.

    Nielsen, L. (2013). Personas. In M. Soegaard, & R.F. Dam (Eds.). The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd Ed). Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation.

  16. 16.

    Pruitt, J., & Adlin, T. (2006). The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout Product Design. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.

  17. 17.

    Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University. (2017). Bootleg Bootcamp. (pp. 26). Retrieved from https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg.

  18. 18.

    Zhang, T., Gino, F., & Margolis, J. (2014). Does “Could” Lead to Good? Toward a Theory of Moral Insight. Harvard Business School Working Paper 14–118.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garrette, B., Phelps, C., Sibony, O. (2018). Redefine the Problem: The Design Thinking Path. In: Cracked it!. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89375-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics