Abstract
The paper seeks to elucidate the difficulties when it comes to appropriately conceptualizing traumatic phenomena. Different conceptualizations, models, and definitions are discussed. A second part is dealing with some clinical problems in the treatment of traumatized patients, as are the problems of reconstruction, historicization, and mental integration of traumatic memories. Neurobiologically an unprocessed trauma can be considered as an interrupted cortical consolidation process, whereby the memory of the traumatic events cannot be transferred into permanent, explicit memory. This is one of the reasons why many traumatized patients suffer from sudden intrusions of traumatic memories. It represents one of the most complex and difficult problems to overcome: While in the first time after traumatization intrusions can further mental integration and the discovery of meaning, they later can become disruptive and overwhelming. The emerging therapeutic narrative can help the patient to avoid relapsing into feeling completely passive and overwhelmed. In the last part of the paper, some specific strategies of interpretation will be described focusing on the irreparable break of the basic trust, the need to control relationships, and the restoring of the paralysed agency of the traumatized self.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, J. (2013). Mentalizing in the development and treatment of attachment trauma. London: Karnac.
Balint, M. (1969). Trauma and object relationship. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 50, 429–436.
Bohleber, W. (2010). Destructiveness, intersubjectivity, and trauma. The identity crisis of modern psychoanalysis. London: Karnac.
Cohen, J. (1985). Trauma and repression. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 5, 163–189.
Cooper, A. (1986). Toward a limited definition of psychic trauma. In A. Rothstein (Ed.), The reconstruction of trauma. Its significance in clinical work (pp. 41–56). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
Freud, S. (1920). Beyond the pleasure principle. Standard Edition, 18, 7–64.
Freud, S. (1926). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. Standard Edition, 20, 77–174.
Freud, S. (1939). Moses and monotheism. Standard Edition, 23, 7–137.
Furst, S. (1978). The stimulus barrier and the pathogenicity of trauma. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 59, 345–352.
Kinston, W., & Cohen, J. (1986). Primal repression: Clinical and theoretical aspects. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 67, 337–355.
Kirshner, L. A. (1994). Trauma, the good object and the symbolic: A theoretical integration. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 75, 235–242.
Krystal, H. (1988). Integration and self-healing. Affect, trauma, alexithymia. Hillsdale: Analytic Press.
Laplanche, J. (1976). Life and death in psychoanalysis. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Laub, D., & Podell, D. (1995). Art and trauma. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 76, 991–1005.
McFarlane, A. C., Yehuda, R., & Clark, C. R. (2002). Biologic models of traumatic memories and post-traumatic stress disorder: The role of neural networks. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 25, 253–270.
Sandler, J., Dreher, A. U., & Drews, S. (1991). An approach to conceptual research in psychoanalysis illustrated by a consideration of psychic trauma. International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 18, 133–142.
Schacter, D. (1996). Searching for memory. The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.
Shalev, A. Y. (1996). Stress versus traumatic stress. From acute homeostatic reactions to chronic psychopathology. In B. van der Kolk, A. Mc Farlane, & L. Weisaeth (Eds.), Traumatic stress. The effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body and society (pp. 77–101). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Steele, B. F. (1994). Psychoanalysis and the maltreatment of children. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 42, 1001–1025.
Siegel, D. (2006). Entwicklungspsychologische, interpersonelle und neurobiologische Dimensionen des Gedächtnisses. Ein Überblick. In H. Welzer, & H. Markowitsch (Hg.), Warum Menschen sich erinnern können. Fortschritte in der interdisziplinären Gedächtnisforschung (pp. 19–49). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Yehuda, R., & LeDoux, J. (2007). Response variation following trauma: A translational neuroscience approach to understanding PTSD. Neuron, 56, 19–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bohleber, W. (2018). Trauma and Its Consequences for the Body and Mind. In: Charis, C., Panayiotou, G. (eds) Somatoform and Other Psychosomatic Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89360-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89360-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89359-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89360-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)