Skip to main content

Can We Learn from History? A Letter to Mr. John Locke, Philosopher

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tolerance : Experiments with Freedom in the Netherlands

Part of the book series: Law and Philosophy Library ((LAPS,volume 124))

  • 543 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter outlines the history of freedom and toleration. It pays particular attention to the Dutch Golden Age that exemplified tolerance, a trendsetting pragmatic response to the problems of modern plural society. It addresses John Locke, who composed his A Letter Concerning Toleration during his stay as a political refugee in Amsterdam in the 1680s. Inspired by his Dutch intellectual friends, Locke expounded the basic ideas of a liberal constitution, albeit not as yet in a perfect way. Spinoza and other representatives of the ‘Radical Enlightenment’ were more coherent in their elaborations of the liberal principles of liberty and equality.

In the subsequent centuries philosophers, such as Mill and Rawls, have completed the model of the neutral democratic constitutional state that guarantees individual liberties and social rights. In interaction with this intellectual progress, in a process of trial and error liberal theory was transformed into political practice throughout the Western world via a series of real and metaphorical revolutions .

This chapter builds on Maris (2000, 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The thesis that Dutch nationalism is a typically 19th-century invention has been refuted by Jensen (2016a). On the occasion of the 1648 Peace of Münster, establishing the independence of the Netherlands, poets, painters and intellectuals celebrated Dutch identity and language. They associated its sense of freedom with the Batavian freedom struggle against the Romans, and announced the Golden Age of the Republic, characterized by the flourishing of commerce, arts and sciences. For more about Dutch national identity in the early modern period, see Waszink (2016), Rommelse (2016), and Schama (1987).

  2. 2.

    In his 1524 open letter to Luther , notorious for his aggressive rhetoric, the Dutch scholar Erasmus stated that he would abstain from invectives because ‘the truth, which by excessive quarrelling is often lost, is discovered with greater certainty without it’ (Erasmus-Luther 1967, p. 6).

  3. 3.

    That, some say, owes its present liberal climate to its Dutch cultural heritage. See Shorto (2004) and (2013).

  4. 4.

    My sceptical pseudo-doctrine is called Critical Schizoism (see Maris 1996). It is based on the idea that we each have a multiple personality, split up into an actor and a spectator (and other subpersonalities). Our acting Self cannot act spontaneously because it is under constant critical self-observation. The observing Self, bound to its body’s perspective, cannot therefore attain objective knowledge from an Archimedean point of view. This scepsis is one of the reasons why I present part of my philosophical works in the form of theatrical and audio-visual projects that have no claim to academic truth, such as the oratorio Horror Vacui (building on Lucretius’ philosophical poem On the Nature of Things (co-written and co-produced in 1989 with the composer José-Luis Greco) ; The Dance of Zarathustra (2004; a theatrical dialogue between the thinker Nietzsche and the dancer Nijinsky) , and We Want our Freedom! (2013; a tragi-comedy on slavery in which you play a leading role—also see Chap. 8). Our multiple personality also constitutes the basis of the ideal of Multiple Love, which figures in Chap. 3 on Sex, Morality and Law.

  5. 5.

    Locke (1991), p. 44: ‘it is also evident which liberty remains to men’, namely ‘that every one should do what he in his conscience is persuaded to be acceptable to the Almighty’.

  6. 6.

    Buys (2015) points to a long tradition of ‘Vernacular Rationalism’, a lay philosophy written in Dutch language, running from the late 13th century (Jacob van Maerlant), through Coornhert in the 16th century and the Remonstrant ‘Coornhertists’, into the Radical Enlightenment of the Dutch 1660s. These lay philosophers tried to educate their compatriots in reasoning autonomously about the good life. This required tolerance, or freedom from coercion by state and church. ‘As such, Vernacular Rationalism was a powerful movement which disseminated a rationalistic view of man and morals in the intellectual, artistic and cultural networks active in the turbulent context of the rising seventeenth-century Dutch Republic. This would explain all the more why Cartesianism and, somewhat later, Spinozism, found such an exceptional fertile breeding ground in Dutch intellectual (and semi-intellectual) circles’ (Buys 2105, p. 241).

  7. 7.

    Religious toleration had been defended back in the pre-modern Middle Ages too, but only from the perspective of a Christian state with an established Catholic Church. In this view, eternal Christian law is normative to public life; yet divergent religions may be allowed some free space.

  8. 8.

    Tiranny, by contrast, extinguishes industry, because nobody has any certainty that he will enjoy the fruits of his investments.

  9. 9.

    See Vries and Van der Woude (1997).

  10. 10.

    This in contrast to Aristotle’s thesis that reasoning is syllogistic: ‘God has not been so sparing to men to make them barely two-legged creatures, and left it to Aristotle to make them rational’ and ‘that before Aristotle there was not one man that did or could know any thing by reason; and that, since the invention of syllogisms, there is not one of ten thousand that doth’ (ECHU XVII, 1; Locke n.d., p. 569).

  11. 11.

    Spinoza (2012): Letter XXIII. Spinoza to Oldenburg .

  12. 12.

    Rawls may misjudge Bayle , whose toleration was more generous than yours. His plea for tolerance included atheists, because in his view decent conduct is dependent on a person’s attitude, not on his faith. In his 1696 Dictionary Bayle pictured Spinoza as both an atheist and an amiable and decent person: ‘That is strange; but aufond one does not have to be more surprised then when one sees people whose way of life is very wicked, although they fully believe in the Gospel’ (Rawls 1999, p. 417).

  13. 13.

    See Israel (1999).

  14. 14.

    Although you, as we have seen, also state that acts that are sinful but not harmful are not the State’s business. Accordingly your arguments against promiscuity have a secular character; but their Christian origin is obvious.

  15. 15.

    Beer (1976), p. 575.

  16. 16.

    Also see Chap. 6 on Freaky Justice and Chap. 7 on Slavery and Public Reason.

  17. 17.

    Likewise, Fukuyama explicitly rejects the Whig Interpretation of modern history: the European modernisation process was the contingent result of shifting power relations.

References

  • Amsterdamsch Hoerdom (1710) Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron W (1698) The Dutch way of toleration, most proper for our English dissenters. Printed for the author, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer ES de (ed) (1976) The correspondence of John Locke, vol 2. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Buys R (2015) Sparks of reason. Vernacular rationalism in the low countries, 1550–1670. Verloren, Hilversum

    Google Scholar 

  • Coornhert DV (2008) Synode over gewetensvrijheid. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Court P de la (1911) Het welvaren van Leiden. Nijhoff, s-Gravenhage

    Google Scholar 

  • Critchley S (2009) The book of dead philosophers. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Enden F van den (1662) Kort Verhael van Nieuw Nederlants. Published anonymously, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Enden F van den (1992 [1665]) Vrije politieke stellingen. Wereldbibliotheek, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Erasmus-Luther (1967) Discourse on the free will. Frederick Ungar, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1984) Harm to others. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg J (1985) Offence to others. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (1992) The end of history and the last man. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama F (2011) The origins of political order. Profile Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton J, Mendus S (eds) (1991) John Locke, a letter concerning toleration in focus. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington SP (1996) The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel J (2002) Radical enlightenment: philosophy and the making of modernity 1650–1750. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel JL (1999) Locke, Spinoza and the philosophical debate concerning toleration in the early enlightenment (c. 1670 - c. 1750). Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen L (2016a) Vieren van vrede. Het ontstaan van de Nederlandse identiteit 1648–1815. Vantilt, Nijmegen

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen L (ed) (2016b) The roots of nationalism: National Identity Formation in early modern Europe, 1600–1815. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy JC (1995a) Building New Babylon: Cultural Change in the Netherlands during the 1960s, UMI Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy JC (1995b) Nieuw Babylon in aanbouw. Nederland in de jaren zestig. Boom, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Clerc J (1706) The life and character of Mr. John Locke, author of the essay concerning human understanding. John Clark, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1708) Some familiar letters between Mr. Locke and several of his friends. Churchil, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1801a) The fundamental constitution of Carolina. In: Johnson J et al (eds) The works of John Locke in ten volumes, vol X. London, pp 175–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1801b) The works of John Locke. In: Johnson J et al (eds) vol 6. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1988) Two treatises of government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (1991) A letter concerning toleration. In: Horton J, Mendus S (eds), pp 12–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke J (n.d.) An essay concerning human understanding. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandeville B (1772) The fable of the bees: or, private vices, public benefits. Wood, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris CW (1996) The Tao of Jur isprudence. Law Critique VII(1):115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maris CW (2000) Brieven over vrijheid. Ars Aequi Libri, Nijmegen

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris CW (2013) Wat nu? zei Pichegru. Filosofie en Praktijk 34(4):44–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Maris CW, Jacobs FCLM (eds) (2011) Law, order and freedom. A historical introduction to legal philosophy. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1977) On liberty; essay on Bentham. Collins/Fontana, Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1996) Political liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls J (1999) Constitutional liberty and the concept of justice. In: Freeman S (ed) John Rawls, collected papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 73–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommelse G (2016) Negative mirror images in Anglo-Dutch relations 1650–1674. In: Jensen L (ed) (2016b) pp 199–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Schama S (1987) The embarrassment of riches. An interpretation of Dutch culture in the golden age. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorto R (2004) The island at the Center of the World: the epic story of Dutch Manhattan and the forgotten Colony that shaped America. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorto R (2013) Amsterdam: a history of the World's most Liberal City. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1977) The wealth of nations. Dent, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza B de (2007) A theological-political treatise. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinoza B de (2012) Letter XXIII. Spinoza to Oldenburg. In: Correspondence of Benedict de Spinoza, Start Publishing LLC

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple W (1720) Observations upon the United Provinces of the Netherlands. In: The works of Sir William Temple, Volume the First. Printed for A. Churchill et al., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Vries J de, Woude A van der (1997) The first modern economy. Success, failure, and perseverance of the Dutch economy, 1500–1815. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Voltaire (2015) Collected works of Voltaire. Deplhi Classics, Hastings

    Google Scholar 

  • Waszink J (2016) The low countries. Constitution, nationhood and character according to Hugo Grotius. In: Jensen L (ed) (2016b), pp 135–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maris, C. (2018). Can We Learn from History? A Letter to Mr. John Locke, Philosopher. In: Tolerance : Experiments with Freedom in the Netherlands. Law and Philosophy Library, vol 124. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89346-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89346-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89344-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89346-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics