Advertisement

The Failure to Eliminate Terrorism

  • Ryszard ZiębaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Global Power Shift book series (GLOBAL)

Abstract

The fifth chapter analyzes the fight against terrorism. As the principal participants of the Euro-Atlantic security system view terrorism as the main threat, they took action unilaterally and undertook multilateral cooperation to combat this trans-border danger. The author shows the War on Terror, proclaimed in 2001 by the USA, as mostly unsuccessful. He views the EU’s actions in this respect similarly. NATO-Russian collaboration in fighting terrorism was relatively successfully but did not produce large scale effects. In contrast, the fast-growing and intensive cooperation in fighting terrorism between Russia and CIS countries brought noticeable results. Generally, the author concludes that participants in the Euro-Atlantic security system are not coping with this dangerous phenomenon.

References

  1. Aldrich, R. J. (2009). US–European intelligence co-operation on counter-terrorism: Low politics and compulsion. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 11(1), 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archik, K. (2014, December 1). US-EU cooperation against terrorism. Washington DC: CRS Report for Congress, Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
  3. Bremberg, N. (2016). Making sense of the EU’s response to the Arab uprisings: Foreign policy practice at the time of crisis. European Security, 25(4), 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cottey, A. (2013). Security in 21st century Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dadush, U., & Dunne, M. (2011). American and European responses to the Arab spring: What’s the big idea? The Washington Quarterly, 34(4), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubois, D. (2002). The attacks of 11 September: EU-US cooperation against terrorism in the field of justice and home affairs. European Foreign Affairs Review, 7(3), 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duke, S. (2002). CESDP and the EU response to 11 September: Identifying the weakest link. European Foreign Affairs Review, 7(2), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EU. (2004). Security and defence: Core documents. In Chaillot paper (Vol. V). 75, February 2005.Google Scholar
  9. EU-U.S. (2004). Declaration on combating terrorism. The Council of the European Union, Dromoland Castle, 26 June 2004, No. 10760/04 (Presse 205).Google Scholar
  10. Forever Prison. (2017, February 22). Retro report. https://www.retroreport.org/video/forever-prison/. Accessed January 22, 2018.
  11. Gasztold, A. (2017). Strategie antyterrorystyczne USA i RFN po 11 września 2001 r. Kwartalnik Naukowy OAP e-Politikon, 21, 155–183.Google Scholar
  12. Invocation in Context. NATO Review, Summer 2006. http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2006/issue2/english/art1.html. Accessed January 27, 2018.
  13. Kelin, A. (2005). NATO-Russia cooperation to counter terrorism. NATO Review. http://www.nato.int/docu/review/2005/issue3/english/art2.html. Accessed January 27, 2018.
  14. Kontseptsiya protivodeystviya terrorizmu v Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Rossiyskaya gazeta—Federal’nyy vypusk No 5022 (198) [The Concept of Counteracting Terrorism in the Russian Federation, Rossiyskaya Gazeta—Federal Issue No. 5022 (198)], https://rg.ru/2009/10/20/zakon-dok.html. Accessed January 27, 2018.
  15. Lindstrom, G. (Ed.). (2003). Shift or rift: Assessing US–EU relations after Iraq. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Lindstrom, G. (2004). Protecting the European homeland: The CBR dimension. Chaillot Paper, 69, 39–54.Google Scholar
  17. Lovelace, D. C. (Ed.). (2015). Terrorism: Commentary on security documents (Vol. 138). The Resurgent Terrorist Threat, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Madej, M. (2012). Drone war on terrorism—użycie bezzałogowych pojazdów latających (UAV) w walce z terroryzmem. Polski Przegląd Dyplomatyczny, 65(3), 55–77.Google Scholar
  19. Masci, D., Jost, K. (2001, October 12). War on terrorism: Can the U.S. contain the global terrorist threat? CQ Researcher, 11(35). http://library.cqpress.com/cqresearcher/document.php?id=cqresrre2001101200. Accessed January 27, 2018.
  20. Meeting in extraordinary session of the NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council at Ambassadorial level, Press Statement. NATO Press Release, September 13, 2001.Google Scholar
  21. National Strategy for Combating Terrorism 2006, National Security Council, Washington D.C., September 2006.Google Scholar
  22. National Strategy for Combating Terrorism, National Security Council, Washington D.C., February 2003.Google Scholar
  23. NATO-Russia Relations: A New Quality, Declaration by Heads of State and Government of NATO Member States and the Russian Federation, Rome Summit—28 May 2002. NATO Basic Text, Rome, Italy, May 28, 2002.Google Scholar
  24. O’Brien, P. (2016). Counter-terrorism in Europe: the elusive search for order. European Security, 25(3), 366–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Porter, A. L., & Bendiek, A. (2012). Counterterrorism cooperation in the transatlantic security community. European Security, 21(4), 497–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rutten, M. (Ed.). (2002). From nice to Laeken: European defence: core documents (Vol. II). Chaillot Paper, No. 51.Google Scholar
  27. Sakwa, R. (2004). Putin Russia choice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Schwarz, E. (2016). Prescription drones: On the techno-biopolitical regimes of contemporary ‘ethical killing’. Security Dialogue, 47(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Show, I. G. R. (2017). Robot wars: US empire and geopolitics in the robotic age. Security Dialogue, 48(5), 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Walker, C. (2011). Terrorism and the law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Zając, J. (2005). Koncepcja polityki zagranicznej USA po zimnej wojnie. In J. Zając (Ed.), Polityka zagraniczna USA o zimnej wojnie (pp. 15–32). Toruń: Adam Marszałek.Google Scholar
  32. Zięba, A. (2017). Systemy antyterrorystyczne Federacji Rosyjskiej i Republiki Litewskiej. Studia Politologiczne, 43, 266–294.Google Scholar
  33. Zięba, R. (2013). Polityka zagraniczna Polski w strefie euroatlantyckiej. Warsaw: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Political Science and International StudiesUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations